In
2010
Subprime Lending Grew More Disparate at Citi, Chase,
Wells & BofA
By
Matthew R. Lee
NEW
YORK,
April 3 -- In the first study of the just-released 2010
mortgage lending data, Bronx-based Fair Finance Watch has found that
the Big Four survivors of the banking meltdown, Citigroup, JPMorgan
Chase, Wells Fargo and Bank of America, continued with high cost
loans and had even worse disparities by race and ethnicity in denials
and higher-cost lending than in 2009.
2010
is the seventh
year in which the data distinguishes which loans are higher cost,
over a federally-defined rate spread of 1.5 percent over Treasury
bill yields.
The
just released
data show that Citigroup confined African Americans to higher-cost
loans above this rate spread 3.67 times more frequently than whites
in 2010, worse that its 2.25 disparity in 2009, Fair Finance Watch
has found.
Citigroup
confined Latinos to higher-cost loans above the
rate spread 2.92 times more frequently than whites in 2010, worse
that its 1.72 disparity in 2009, the data show.
JPMorgan
Chase was
even more disparate to Latinos, confined them to higher-cost loans
2.08 times more frequently than whites in 2010, worse than its own
1.98 disparity in 2009 and almost as pronounced as its 2.69 disparity
between African-Americans and whites in 2010, worse than its 2.17
disparity in 2009.
For
Bank of America
NA, the disparity for African Americans in 2010 was 2.59; for the
largest of Wells Fargo's many HMDA data reporters, the disparity for
African Americans in 2010 was 2.56.
“Regulatory
laxity, at least on fair lending, has continued despite the financial
meltdown caused by this predatory lending,” said Fair Finance
Watch. “When these four banks were allowed to buy up others with very
little oversight, the regulators did not put
any conditions on the mergers or Troubled Assets Relief Program
bailouts. These worsening
disparities are the result.
"Now it
is not clear if the new Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau will get to this problem. As things are going, it
will be worse and more disparate in 2011. The disparities in the 2010
mortgage data of the Big Four further militate for aggressively
watchdogging and breaking up these
banks," Fair Finance Watch concluded.
Dimon of JPMC, Pandity of Citi, et al: regulators not shown
Regional
bank
Keycorp in 2010 confined African Americans to higher-cost loans above
the rate spread 2.24 times more frequently than whites.
U.S. Bancorp
in 2010 confined African Americans to higher-cost loans above the
rate spread 2.12 times more frequently than whites, and confined
Latinos to higher-cost loans above the rate spread an even worse 2.2
times more frequently than whites.
Huntington
in 2010
confined African Americans to higher-cost loans above the rate spread
2.2 times more frequently than whites, and confined Latinos to
higher-cost loans above the rate spread an even worse 2.8 times more
frequently than whites.
Growing
Southern
bank Regions in 2010 denied applications by African Americans 2.56
times more frequently than whites. BanCorpSouth in 2010 denied
applications by African Americans 2.6 times more frequently than
whites.
Fair Finance
Watch has begun an enforcement project in the
South, most recently raising issues under the Community Reinvestment
Act on Hancock of Mississippi's application to acquire
Louisiana-based Whitney, see “Flag
raised on merger of Hancock,
Whitney banks,” New Orleans Times Picayune, March 13, 2011.
Fair
Finance Watch
has also been active in raising issues concerning Bank of Montreal /
Harris and their proposal to buy M&I. In response, while the
Federal Reserve Board asked some fair lending questions, the majority
of the banks' response has been blacked out, which Inner City Press
is challenging under the Freedom of Information Act.
Using
the 2010
HMDA data, Fair Finance Watch has commented that Bank of Montreal's
Harris confined African Americans to higher cost, rate spread loans
2.35 times more frequently than whites.
M&I
Federal Savings Bank
confined African Americans to higher cost, rate spread loans 2.1
times more frequently than whites. Bank of Montreal's Harris denied
the applications of African Americans 2.35 times, and Latinos two
times more frequently than those of whites. The Fed extended the
comment period on the merger once, but now seeks to close it with the
fair lending information still outstanding.
Fair
Finance Watch
has submitted another timely comment, that Comerica, which is seeking
to acquire Houston-based Sterling, in 2010 confined African Americans
6.26 times more frequently than whites to higher cost, rate spread
loans. At Comerica, 11.3 percent of loans to African Americans were
over the rate spread, versus only 1.9 percent of loans to whites.
The
law required
that the 2010 data be provided by April 1, following March 1 joint
requests by Fair Finance Watch and Inner City Press. Several banks
did not provide their data by the deadline. Trustmark provided its
data at the deadline but only in paper format, such that it could not
yet be computer-analyzed. Further studies will follow: watch this
site.
* * *
Extension
on
Bank
of Montreal - M&I Comment Period After Withholding Hit
by
Matthew
R.
Lee
NEW
YORK,
March
24 -- On Bank of
Montreal's application to buy M&I,
the Federal Reserve on March 24 granted a one week extension of the
comment period to Inner City Press / Fair Finance Watch (ICP), which
has protested the proposed merger under the Community Reinvestment
Act.
ICP
has raised to
the Fed, for example, that in the Chicago area “Bank of Montreal's
Harris Bank in 2009, the most recent year for which Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act data is available, denied the conventional home
purchase loan applications of Latinos 2.52 times more frequently than
those of whites. An even more extreme disparity exists for African
Americans in the Gary Indiana MSA.”
Bank
of
Montreal,
though its law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, has sought to withhold
large portions of its submissions to the Fed from ICP and the public.
On March 20,
Inner
City Press challenged the “radical redaction”
of information by Bank of Montreal under the Freedom of Information
Act, and argued that the comment period, set to close on March 22,
could not close while this information was being withheld.
On
March 24, Inner
City Press received a letter from the Federal Reserve Board, stating
in part that the “Secretary of the Board has decided to extend the
period of time in which to receive your comments on the proposal to
the close of business on Thursday, March 31, 2001.” Click here for the
Federal Reserve's March 24 letter to Inner City Press. Click
here
for
some of Bank of Montreal's recent redactions.
The
2010 HMDA
data has just been obtained by Fair Finance Watch, and analysis will
be submitted to the Federal Reserve during the extended comment
period.
The banks' logos, withholding of basic information not shown
Applicable
banking
law
requires the Federal Reserve to consider the Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA). On CRA ratings, Harris has a “Low
Satisfactory” rating in lending, investment and service in
Wisconsin, M&I's headquarters, and a Low Satisfactory under the
service test in adjacent Indiana.
Fair
Finance
Watch
notes that the official whom Bank of Montreal has assigned to merger
integration, Cecily Mistarz, was previously in charge of strategy for
“Harris Private Bank, a unit that provides wealth management
services to affluent individuals and families” -- giving rise to
concerns that if run by Bank of Montreal, the resulting bank would
turn away from low and moderate income communities.
Fair
Finance
Watch
also notes that despite M&I not having paid its TARP bail out
back, the CEO of M&I stands to get a $18 million payout from the
proposed acquisition. Watch this site.
* * *
As
Bloomberg's
Treasurer
Opposes
Rating
Banks,
Chase & Goldman Slammed
By
Matthew
R.
Lee
LOWER
MANHATTAN,
March
7
--
Even
after the financial industry meltdown
based on predatory lending, the Bloomberg administration in New York
City on March 7 publicly opposed a proposal local law that would rate
banks on community service before the City does business with them.
Bloomberg's
City
Treasurer
protested
that
“banks
are heavily regulated,” despite
the finding that lack of regulation allowed banks, many based in New
York, to engage in Ponzi scheme like trading of predatory mortgages.
Next,
Bloomberg's
Treasurer
said
that
it
would be hard to replace a bank if it were
disqualified. First, given Community Reinvestment Act grade inflation
at the federal and state level, disqualification of any large bank
would seem sadly unlikely.
Second,
it
emerged
that
the
City
has qualified 35 banks, ranging from small banks like
Ridgewood Saving Bank up to Deutsche Bank, HSBC, Citibank, JPMorgan
Chase and “Goldman Sachs Bank,” of which Council member Leroy G.
Comrie asked, “I wonder why we are still doing business with them?
I don't understand, I would use stronger language but it's Monday
morning.”
HSBC,
it
has
been
noted
by
Inner City Press, sold
a
stake to Liby's
Gaddafi; Deutsche
Bank is among the larger foreclosers, with little accountability.
Citigroup's predatory lending arm CitiFinancial is so disgraced it
has been renamed One Main and still can't be sold off.
The
Treasurer
devolved into claiming that only two or three banks can do the City's
business, although she didn't name them.
In hearing room, Al Vann et al listen to Bloomberg's
Treasurer (c) MRLee
There was talk of
layoffs in
the Department of Finance, and of DoF's Commissioner being required
to answer more questions on Thursday in “Emigrant Savings Bank, the
Council's temporary chambers.”
The bill was
not slated for a vote
at the hearing; there will be more on this, especially the national
implications, represented on Monday by NCRC.
Council
member
Gale
Brewer
asked
if
the DoF's lobbyist would engage with national
groups around the federal Community Reinvestment Act. “I don't know
when CRA is up for renewal,” he replied.
As
the hearing
stretched on, more and more Council members came in, perhaps sensing
Bloomberg's weakness, ranging from Joel Rivera and Helen Foster of
The Bronx through Brad Lander to Lewis A. Fidler.
Member
Fernando
Cabrera
said
that
last
night he went to a “nice Mexican
restaurant,” and found the Bloomberg administration's health
ratings useful. “But it would confuse consumers” when applied to
banks, Bloomberg's Treasurer said.
Al
Vann and
Domenic Recchia introduced the law, and Ricchia specifically
denounced JPMorgan Chase as not being willing to modify loans in New
York City. As Inner City Press came in to the drab hearing room, in
250 Broadway's 16th floor, another
attendee asked, “Is this the hearing about Chase Bank?”
Maybe.
March 1,
2011 BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12
debate
on
Sri
Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis
here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office:
S-453A,
UN,
NY
10017
USA
Tel:
212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile
(and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier
Inner
City
Press
are
listed
here,
and
some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08
Inner
City
Press,
Inc.
To
request
reprint
or
other
permission,
e-contact
Editorial
[at]
innercitypress.com
-
|