On
Afghanistan UN Guterres Empty
Statement On Kabul and Faryab As
He Conceals Corruption With
Censorship
By Matthew
Russell Lee, CJR Letter
PFT, Scope
UN GATE,
September 3 – Amid UN Antonio
Guterres' empty statements of
concern while he bans and
censors the Press came this on
September 3 on Afghanistan:
"The Secretary-General
strongly condemns yesterday’s
attack in Kabul by the
Taliban. Such indiscriminate
attacks can never be
justified. The
Secretary-General expresses
his deepest sympathy to the
families of the victims and
wishes a speedy recovery to
those
injured.
The Kabul bombing came days
after the Taliban attacks in
Kunduz and Baghlan Provinces
that caused scores of civilian
casualties. The
Secretary-General also remains
concerned about civilian
casualties caused by
pro-government aerial and
search operations, including
on 31 August in Faryab
Province... The
Secretary-General expresses
the solidarity of the United
Nations with the people and
the Government of
Afghanistan.
Stéphane Dujarric, Spokesman
for the
Secretary-General
New York, 3 September 2019."
Empty statements, at least
those from the Secretariat -
Guterres sides with any power
to try to get a second term;
Dujarric refuses questions and
censors the Press, even while
his noon briefing is empty and
has no questions at all, video
here.
Also from
Guterres' UN, on August 30,
this: the
UN issued a
denial of
accreditation
with no
reasoning
other than
that
accreditation
had previously
been revoked:
"From:
malu at UN
Date: Fri, Aug
30, 2019 at
4:23 PM
Subject: U.N.
eAccreditation
request for
Matthew Lee
Ref # M5413398
has been
declined
To: Inner City
Press:
Greetings
Matthew Lee
from Inner
City
Press,
Your media
accreditation
request, with
reference no:
M5413398, has
been declined
for the
following
reason: Media
accreditation
was withdrawn
on 17 August
2018."
This is
Kafka-esque,
and corrupt.
We will have
more, much
more, on this.
Inner City
Press banned
from the UN now 426 days after
10 years of coverage, as it
reports on Guterres' conflicts
of interest for example
on China Energy Fund Committee
and on Cameroon, reported that
back in November, Guterres
said or had written for him
this: "The Secretary-General
strongly condemns today’s
attack targeting Afghans
gathered in Kabul to celebrate
a day of special religious
significance. The
deliberate targeting of
civilians is a clear violation
of international humanitarian
law. Every effort should be
made to bring perpetrators to
justice.The Secretary-General
extends his deepest sympathy
and condolences to the
families of the victims and
the Government of
Afghanistan. He wishes a
speedy recovery to those
injured." Must have been some
lunch. Meanwhile former UN
offiical Helen Clark on 19
November 2018 criticized
Guterres' exclusion from the
UN, Vine here. But does
Guterres care? Can he hear,
inside his Mercedes? On
October 18, with Inner City
Press still banned from the UN
now for 107 days and counting
by Guterres, the UN Security
Council issued this: "The
members of the Security
Council condemned in the
strongest terms the attacks
that took place in Afghanistan
over the past weeks, including
in Jowzjan, Kunduz, Takhar,
Herat, Zabul, Farah and today
in Kandahar, resulting in
numerous casualties and many
injured, ahead of the
parliamentary elections in
Afghanistan on 20 October.
The members of the Security
Council expressed their
deepest sympathy and
condolences to the families of
the victims and to the
Government of Afghanistan and
they wished a speedy and full
recovery to those who were
injured.
The members of the Security
Council underscored the
importance of a secure
environment for conducting
elections and emphasized that
violence in any form, or the
threat thereof, intended to
disrupt the elections and
democratic process in
Afghanistan is unacceptable."
Thre American were injured and
the American commander in the
area was present at the
attack... On August 27, the UN
Security Council which at
least under UK presidency is
content to let Guterres pick
and chose which media can
enter and ask questions,
issued a statement beginning:
"The members of the Security
Council welcomed the
announcement by the Government
of Afghanistan on 19 August of
a second conditional ceasefire
with the Taliban from the
start of the Eid al-Adha
holiday.
The members of the Security
Council urged the Taliban to
reciprocate without delay.
They also reiterated their
call upon the Taliban to
accept the offer made by the
Afghan Government in February
this year to engage in direct
peace talks without any
preconditions and without the
threat of violence, with the
aim of an ultimate political
settlement that leads to
sustainable peace for the
people of Afghanistan.
The members of the Security
Council reiterated the
importance of an inclusive
Afghan-led and -owned peace
process for the long-term
prosperity and stability of
Afghanistan, and expressed
their full support for the
Afghan Government’s efforts to
that end.
The members of the Security
Council emphasised the
importance of holding
peaceful, inclusive, credible
and transparent parliamentary
elections on 20 October 2018
and presidential election on
20 April 2019." Looking back,
Khalilzad during as his time
as US Ambassador was always
accessible. Inner City Press
spoke with him many times
during the late night budget
meetings of example the type
Guterres and his spokesman
Stephane Dujarric had Inner
City Press roughed
up for covering on 3
July 2018. Here was from 21
December 2007: "Ban's
bodyguards loitered by the
Vienna cafe, standing at the
ready. The vacuum cleaners
began in Conference Room 5.
There was no turning back.
Down the hall came the
American flotilla: Permanent
Representative Zalmay
Khalilzad, Ambassadors
Alejandro Wolff and Mark
Wallace, accompanied by
Controller Warren Sach and the
Secretary of the Fifth
Committee. In the corner of
Conference Room 3 they
pow-wowed, as other delegates
tried to get in. They
discussed the U.S. political
ramifications of various ways
of voting on the budget. Leave
it to the experts, Khalilzad
said. But as written, we
cannot vote for the budget, he
told Inner City Press, as he
Googled past midnight."
Compare that to today, where
for covering the budget
meetings from the same
(expensively renovated) Vienna
Cafe, Guterres has you assaulted
- a crime scene - then
imposes a lifetime
ban. The UN is in
decline, even decay.
Four days after UN Security
officers led by UN Lieutenant
Ronald E. Dobbins pushed Inner
City Press' reporter out of
the UN during a speech by
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres, on June 26 Guterres
envoy to Afghanistan Tadamichi
Yamomoto came to the Security
Council stakeout to take
questions. But of the entire
UN press corps, only Inner
City Press was there.
Guterres' deputy spokesman
Farhan Haq who had run out on
Inner City Press' questions
about the ouster the day
before told Yamamoto
leadingly, gesturing at the
UNTV microphone, "It's up to
you." Inner City Press
encouraged Yamamoto and he
came over. Periscope video here. On August 17,
Guterres' Global Communicator
Alison Smale issued a no due
process ruling
that Inner City Press is
banned from the UN - for life.
It is outrageous
and we'll have more on it - it
was ghoulishly reiterated on 2
January 2019, see here.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|