UNITED NATIONS
GATE, August
1 --
The UN of
Antonio
Guterres hit a
new low on 26
July 2019.
After roughing
up and banning
Inner
City Press,
now 394
days, and
refusing to
answer its written
questions on
Guterres'
waste of
public funds,
concealment
of his
financial links
with convicted UN
briber CEFC
China Energy
and failure in Cameroon
and elsewhere,
below,
the UN
noon briefing
on July 26 had
not a single
in-person question.
Video on
YouTube here.
Now another
video has emerged,
which is a
satire of
Guterres and
his team,
their waste of
money and
their routine
retaliation.
Satire video here.
In it,
Guterres demands
of his
cowering
yes-men (the
women are
ordered out of
the room to
commiserate
about the
sexual harassement
that has flourished
under
Guterres'
hypocritical
reign from Colin
Stewart
to Fabrizio
Hochschild.
Guterres
demands to
know what UN
Security's
Ronald E.
Dobbins,
who had had
push Inner City
Press out of
the UN on 22 June 2019 and oversee
its more
violent
removal on 3
July 2018, here, didn't finish the job with
cement.
Guterres derides
having to stay
in New York,
where he
says his
bacchanals
are exposed by
Inner City
Press'
live-stream
Periscope
broadcasts like
in front of "his"
$15 million
mansion, or the
UN
Correspondents
Association's
Cipriani fundraiser,
or most
recently the
July 30
Morocco
National Day,
here.
Mention is
made of
Guterres' wife
Catarina
Marques de
Almeida Vaz
Pinto
still not
moving to New
York after two
and a half
years - she
too is linked
to the
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which tried to
sell its oil
coming to CEFC China
Energy - and
to UNDP Achim Steiner's
travel
spending abuse
being exposed
by Inner
City Press
(misspelled
Innercitypress)
using
documents
leaked to it
by whistleblowers by
placement
beneath bench
in the the
45th Street bus
stop from
which Inner
City Press
worked for
months after Guterres'
rough up and
ban.
Guterres,
it is predicted,
will not
only try to
retaliate
against
producer(s?) and
viewers of the
video, but may
if unsuccessful in
this as in so
much deride it
as "hate
speech," the last
refuge in
this case of a
scoundrel.
The video muses
that
Guterres may
end up, or Catarina
Vaz Pinto
in Lisbon may
have concluded
he'll
end up, "like
Michael Avenatti or
Jeffrey Epstein,"
prosecuted in
the U.S. District
Court for the
Southern
District of
New York which
Inner City
Press has been
covering daily
this
year in exile
from the UN
apparently as
long as dictator
Guterres
remains in his
bunker in the
UN.
On
July 31 Inner
City Press ran
an exclusive
about Jeffrey
Epstein
monopolizing
all day
one of the two
legal meeting
rooms for detainees
in the Special Housing
Unit of the
Metropolitan
Correctional
Center jail.
Perhaps it's a
job for
Guterres, or
Big Tony as he
has become
known.
July 26
UN transcript
here;
"That’s it
from me. Are
there any
questions?
All
right.
Over to you,
Monica."
Back
on August 17,
Guterres'
Global
Communicator
Alison Smale
issued a
letter banning
Inner City
Press from the
UN - for life.
With no due
process. She
and Guterres
have put the
UN in the US
Press Freedom
Tracker, here.
Smale said,
again, that
the UN would
answer Press
questions to
the Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric and
his Office;
Dujarric said the
same on
camera.
On July 26
more than
three hours
before the UN
noon briefing
by Deputy
Farhan Haq just
before which on the
third
day he
belatedly
answered written
questions
about UN child
rape in DRC, here --
Dujarric was
away on
vacation for
the whole
month of July
--
Inner
City Press submitted 1073
questions,
including why
it continues
to be
lawlessly banned
from entering
to ask
questions in
person:
"There
are more than
700+
questions
UNanswered. While
appreciating
and using what
was belatedly
sent on March
28 in partial
[canned] response to
Inner City
Press'
questions
about the UN
bribery
sentence of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC and
CEFC's 2018
attempt to buy
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid the
SG....
no
answers at all
during those
four days of
the US v Ho
trial showing
corruption in
the UN says it
all. This ban
is just
censorship -
and Inner City
Press must be
allowed back
into the noon
briefing to
ask its
questions in
person and
follow up on
them.
July
25-4: On
Cameroon,
after the SG
took Biya's
golden statue
and UN Budget
Committee
favors, what
are the
comments and
actions if any
from him and
separately DSG
Amina J.
Mohammed on
the protests
on July 22 by
those
Ambazonians
illegally
detained in
Kondengui
Central
Prison? And
the protests
since then,
amid the SG's
typical
silence, in
the prisons in
Buea?
July
25-5: Now that
the US Court
of Appeals for
the Second
Circuit has
ruled against
public
officials
blocking
critics on
Twitter even
if the
official
claims their
account is
private, what
is the
justification
for UNSG
Spokesperson
Stephane
Dujarric, with
the UN flag in
his profile
photo and
Guterres
promoting
content,
blocking Inner
City Press?
What is SG
Guterres'
response /
reaction to UN
DSS and
Guterres'
actions on
Inner City
Press being listed
in the U.S.
Press Freedom
Tracker.
In the UN,
what has the
accountability
been for Lt
Ronald E.
Dobbins and
those those
refused on
camera to give
their names?
What is each
of yours -
particularly
the SG's -
response to
the letter
written and
sent by
Burundi
activist
Manisha
Lievin? To the
April 15
letter to the
SG, DSG and
USG Smale for
which receipt
has not even
been
acknowledged,
other than a
single lawless
line from
MALU: "Your
media
accreditation
request, with
reference no:
M66561081, has
been
declined"?
This is a
formal request
for the UN's
explanation of
grounds for
this denied,
and since
SGcentral, the
SG's chief of
staff and
Deputy SG and
USG Smale
haven't even
confirmed
receipt of the
April 15
letter much
less
responded, for
reconsideration.
AGAIN,
immediately
explain how it
is legitimate
to ban from
entering into
the UN the
media that has
been asking
about these
and other
questions,
with no
hearing or
appeal.
June
11-1: Again,
how many
offices / desk
does the
Secretariat
give to
Chinese state
media inside
the UN?
May
15-3: On the
Public
Financial
Disclosures
for 2017
belatedly
published over
the weekend of
April 27-28,
please state
why Mohammed
Ibn Chambas,
like the
Executive
Secretary of
the UN
Biodiversity
Convention,
Cristiana
Paşca-Palmer,
UNICEF's
Henriette
Fore, with
documented
links to
ExxonMobil and
others, USG
Mark Lowcock
(undisclosed
while the
Secretariat's
speaker at the
UNSC Arria on
Cameroon),
UNCTAD's
Mukhisa
Kituyi, UN
Women's
Phumzile
Mlambo-Ngcuka,
UNOG chief
Michael
Moller, UNDP
chief Achim
Steiner,
Heidi Mendoza,
Adama Dieng,
UN Security
chief Peter
Drennan,
Rosemary
DiCarlo and
Nicholas
Haysum, is not
even on the
list. OIOS
chief
Inga-Britt
Ahlenius
reported - why
not Mendoza?
Where IS
Mendoza? Isn't
it a bad
practice for
the UN's head
(anti)
genocide
definition
official to
conceal from
the public
even cursory
financial
disclosure?
Did DiCarlo
decline to
make any
public
disclosure
despite being
the UN's top
political
officer? Why
has Guterres
changed the
previous
system in a
which a
"choosing not
to disclose"
statement was
upload and
listed, to one
which helps
conceal who
reports and
who does
not?
Again, state
why
considering
the UN bribery
conviction of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC, and
CEFC's attempt
to purchase
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid Mr.
Guterres in
2016 was
omitted from
his online
public
financial
disclosure
covering 2016,
and why
Guterres has
not even
started an
audit of CEFC
in the
UN.