In
Ban's
UN, Press Barred from Photo Op with Sri Lanka Opposition
Leader
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
July 5 -- That UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon “runs
scared,” as one of his staffers puts it, more on Sri Lanka than
other countries was again on display,
but not to be photographed, on July 5. Ban was to meet with
Ranil Wickremesinghe, described in Ban's schedule as “Leader of the
Opposition.”
But
when Inner
City Press asked to attend the photo opportunity at the beginning of
Ban's meeting with Ranil, the double standards began.
Only
last week,
with “Leader of the Opposition” of Israel Tzipi Livni met with
Ban, Inner City Press was allowed to go to the photo op, observing
the banter between Ban and the Israeli delegation.
At
the July 5 noon
briefing, Inner City Press
asked Ban's spokesman Martin Nesirky:
Inner
City
Press: there is this meeting till this afternoon with the
opposition leader; I wanted to know, actually I wanted to know
whether it is possible if there is going to be any kind of photo op
for even the Sri Lankan delegates or UN Photo? And I also wanted to
know, just sort of yes or no, if the Secretary-General has now seen
the Channel 4 documentary Killing Fields depicting war crimes and
somewhat critical of the UN’s…?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
On the first, UN Photo will certainly be there, and I know
that you’ve already requested to the Media Accreditation and
Liaison Unit [MALU]whether you can be present. And I am checking on
that. And as for the other, as I think you already heard from Farhan
in the last few days, a copy of the film, the documentary has been
given to the Secretary-General. I don’t know whether he has had
the time to see it yet. But as I have told you before as well, he
has been fully briefed on its contents.
Shortly
after this
noon briefing exchange, Inner City Press was informed by MALU that it
could not attend the photo op. While Nesirky told MALU he would ask
UN Photo to put the Ban and Ranil photo online shortly after the
meeting, as of 7 pm on Tuesday the photo was not up -- unlike
the
UN's own Livni - Ban photo.
Ban & Israel "Opposition Leader" Livni June 29,
Ranil July 5 not shown
Inner
City Press
waited downstairs from the meeting. Ranil and his escort, Deputy
Permanent Representative Shavendra Silva, never walked through any
public area of the UN. Instead, going up at 3:30 pm were Ban's top
lawyer (who refuses to speak with the press) Patricia O'Brien and the
UN staffer who accepted a Tamil petition earlier this year then asked
that his name not be published.
What
is wrong with
Team Ban on the Sri Lanka issue? Ban's chief of staff was involved in
the so-called White Flag killings of surrenderees. Does that explain
it? Or is there more? Watch this site.
* * *
Sri
Lanka
& UN's Ban, Photos Not Allowed, Killing Fields Not Seen?
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
July 5 -- Last week Ban Ki-moon's acting deputy spokesman
told Inner City Press that Ban had been
given a copy of the “Killing
Fields” documentary showing war crimes in Sri Lanka and would see
if when he had time. It was also confirmed that on July 5 Ban would
meet with Sri Lankan politician Ranil Wickremesinghe.
When
July 5
arrived, this meeting was listed at 3:30 pm. Inner City Press asked,
just to confirm, that it would be allowed to take photographs at the
beginning, as happens as such meetings, not only by UN Photo and
delegations but also independent media.
Inner
City Press
was told to wait and see. At the day's noon briefing, Inner City
Press asked Ban's spokesman Martin Nesirky if there would be such a
photo op. He said, you have asked earlier, we do not yet know.
On
whether Ban had
taken the time to see the “Killing Fields,” Nesirky reiterated
that Ban has been given a copy, but said he doesn't know if Ban has
seen it. Ban's schedule lists another a trip later on Monday, to
Spain.
Ban & M. Rajapaksa Sept 2010, Killing Fields and UN review not shown
After
the noon
briefing, Inner City Press was informed that it would not be allowed
to photograph Ban's meeting with Ranil. It would be photographed by
the UN itself, “for archival purposes.” It was said that an
attempt will be made to make the UN's own photo available; then it
was said that this is not done. A blackout of independent media,
then. We'll see.
* * *
As
Ban's
Spokesman
Blames
UN
Radio for Question, Other Answers Not Public
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
June
22
--
Just after Ban Ki-moon won his one-candidate race
for five more years as UN Secretary General, when he came to the
General Assembly stakeout on June 21 his final
question was given to
the UN's own in-house radio station.
The
question
was,
“hi
Secretary-General, it is nice to see you again. How do you feel on
this historic day and what is the message you have to the young
people of the world?”
Ban
smiled
and
gave
his longest answer at the stakeout, transcribed
and put online
by the UN.
The
next
Inner
City Press asked
Ban's
spokesman
Martin
Nesirky, “at that press encounter yesterday, it seemed that the
question was granted by yourself to UN Radio, which is owned by the
UN, so it’s sort of an in-house station. Is that generally
accepted?”
Nesirky,
prepared
for the question, said that “No, it is not generally accepted, and
it shouldn’t have happened. And UN Radio staff have been reminded
of what the rules are. The rules are quite clear: it is for people
with press badges to ask questions.”
Some
wondered
about
blaming
the hapless UN Radio reporter, when it was Ban's
spokesman who for whatever reason devoted the last question to her,
and has
left the seemingly scripted answer online.
Later
on
June
22
this problem was addressed by Ban taking, but the UN apparently not
transcribing, by-invitation only questions, about Kashmir, Japanese
engineers to South Sudan and as reported, Syria.
Ban
was
asked,
perhaps
as wishful thinking, about “speculation in Korea that you
are a potential candidate for the President. Are you going to run for
the presidency of the country?”
Twenty
hours
later,
unlike
his stage-managed stakeout including the child question
from UN Radio, this Ban Q&A has not been transcribed and put
online by the UN, even in its “off the cuff” section.
To
some
this
appeared
to be a new media strategy, implemented on the first
two days of Ban's new term:
Take
public
questions
from
the UN's own media and put the answers online; take
questions in private from hand-selected journalists and don't put any
transcript online. We'll see.
Click for Mar 1, '11
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption
Click
here
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12
debate
on
Sri
Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis
here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office:
S-453A,
UN,
NY
10017
USA
Tel:
212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile
(and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier
Inner
City
Press
are
listed
here,
and
some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08
Inner
City
Press,
Inc.
To
request
reprint
or
other
permission,
e-contact
Editorial
[at]
innercitypress.com
-
|