With
Ban
in Ebola Zone,
Qs of
Transparency
and Freedoms,
UNanswered
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 20 --
As UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon
conducts
a belated
whirlwind tour
through Ebola
impacted
countries and
then
the
headquarters
of the UN
Ebola response
mission UNMEER
in Ghana,
questions have
arisen about
Ban's moves on
the leadership
and future
of UNMEER, and
transparency
more
generally.
Among
responses to
Ebola have
been the
arrest of
journalists
and now house
to house
searches. But
Ban did not
mention these.
Nor has the
UN's
policies for
medical
evacuation
rights for its
national staff
members
been
disclosed,
despite
numerous
requests by
Inner City
Press and the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access.
Ban
has said he
intends to end
UNMEER in
September
2015. So why,
some
ask, did he
his month
replace
Anthony
Banbury as its
chief, with
only
nine months
remaining in
the mission?
And why did he
replace him
with
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
of Mauritania,
about whose
service in
Syria,
Yemen and
Libya many
doubts exist?
Sources
in
Yemen say Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
was the UN's
“designated
security
official” when
a UNICEF
staffer was
taken hostage
while
traveling
to the Sana'a
airport
without the
required (and
needed)
security
detail. Some
say Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
was
distracted, in
Yemen and
later
in Libya, by
side business
interests.
But
a check of Ban
Ki-moon's
Public
Disclosure
website, where
his
officials are
supposed to
make
rudimentary
disclosure of
the finances
and outside
business
interests,
does not even
list Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed (while
numerous other
Deputy SRSGs
are listed).
His is not in
the most recent
database, for
2013 - and may
escape any disclosure
by become an
Under
Secretary
General with a
mere nine
month stint at
UNMEER. Then
what? We'll
say on this.
Then
again, the
disclosure
page for Ban's
head of UN
Peacekeeping
Herve
Ladsous does
not even work,
yielding this:
“The requested
URL
/sg/ethicalstandards/2013/Hervé
Ladsous.pdf
was not found
on this
server.” Some
transparency.
Ladsous
refuses
to answer
Press
questions, on
cover up of
rapes in the
DR
Congo and
now Darfur,
and his peacekeepers
shooting at
democracy
demonstrators
in Haiti.
Ban
Ki-moon held a
press
conference in
New York on
December 17
but no
questions were
allowed on any
of these
topics. In
fact, it
seemed
clear that Ban
had demanded
and gotten
questions in
advance, to
know
how to answer.
But his
spokesman
would not
confirm or
deny this,
only
saying it is
his job to
have Ban
“prepared” for
his press
conference.
We'll have
more on this.