Ban
Ki-moon
Advisers
Defend Sri
Lanka Crimes
By Linking
Press with
LTTE, France
Smells Blood?
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, June
9 -- Amid
threatening
anonymous
telephone
calls triggered
by a
proceeding at
the UN
against Inner
City Press, on
June 7 a Sri
Lankan
journalist
asked Inner
City Press,
"there is wide
spread
allegation
that you have
been funded by
pro Liberation
Tigers of
Tamil Eelam
LTTE lobby
groups during
the last few
years. How do
you react to
that
allegation?"
As
Inner City
Press was, in part for
self-protection,
seeking to end
the public
witch hunt
against it by
offering a
balanced
mutual apology,
it could not
on June 7
answer as
directly as
now. Instead
the Sri Lankan
journalist was
told, and reported
"I
reject these
funding
allegations
which are made
by Sinhalese
extremists,
including in
the Sri Lankan
government,
against anyone
who raises the
issue of the
killing of
civilians in
May 2009. I am
troubled that
some in UN SG
Ban Ki-moon's
administration,
who feel Inner
City Press'
coverage has
made Ban look
bad, including
for accepting
General
Shavendra
Silva as an
adviser, are
known to have
echoed or
amplified
these
Sinhalese
extremist
claims."
What
does this last
line mean? Well,
advisers close
to Ban Ki-moon
now and before
he became
Secretary
General have
said, as a
defense, that
Inner City
Press is
funded by the
LTTE.
Other UN
officials have
told Inner
City Press
that that the
allegation of
LTTE funding
has been
bandied around
in decision
making
meetings.
This is the UN
itself, at the
highest level,
fanning anti
press freedom
flames.
On June 3 the
largest
English
langauge
newspaper in
Sri Lanka
reported, "if
the
allegations
against Lee
are proven,
the UN
headquarters
will be made
out of bounds
for him. If
the harassment
charges are
proven he
could face a
jail term of
up to six
years." See, http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2012/06/03/new11.asp
After
Ban's Media
Accreditation
and Liaison
Unit three
times said it
would renew
Inner City
Press
accreditation
to cover the
UN, including
in this
context, on
June 4 it
reverse course
and said no.
What has the
response to
this been?
A week ago,
Inner City
Press wrote to
Ken
Roth of Human
Rights Watch,
the Committee
to Protect
Journalists,
the chief
editors of Reuters
(Stephen
Adler) and Bloomberg
(Matthew
Winkler) and
then UNESCO.
Inner
City Press
raised to
these and
others the
fact that
Inner City
Press is being
targeted by pro government
Sri Lanka
media,
with stories
now
using
information
from the Sri
Lankan Mission
led by
Permanent
Representative
Palitha Kohona
and citing
his deputy
General
Shavendra
Silva. The
stories also
quote a letter
and e-mails
from the UN
Correspondents
Association,
whose
president Giampaolo
Pioli accepted
money as rent
from Kohona
and then
refused to
recuse
himself.
So
far, despite
an inquiry
with HRW's
Richard Dicker
outside a
press
conference by
outgoing
International
Criminal Court
prosecutor
Luis Moreno
Ocampo, there
has been no
response at
all from Roth
and HRW, nor
from Adler or
Reuters, nor
Winkler or
Bloomberg.
Inner
City Press
wrote to the
editor of
another UNCA
officer, and
the only
response was
to be hauled
again in front
of UNCA
and berated
for having
dared write to
the officer's
editor.
When shown
virulent Sri
Lanka
government
media attacks
on Inner City
Press, the UNCA
officer said
"I don't care
about that."
The Reuters
bureau chief
turned over
one such
article handed
to him, before
Inner City
Press was
told it was
summarily
"suspended"
from UNCA.
CPJ
responded
in writing
that it is
(too) busy; at
a recent "protection
of
journalists"
event
sponsored by
the French
Mission at the
UN, Inner
City Press asked
CPJ's director
about the
disappearance
of Sri Lankan
journalist
Prageeth,
without answer.
The French
mission has
used "its"
representative
on UNCA, Tim
Witcher of
Agence France
Presse, to
push and vote
to expel Inner
City Press.
Now, do they
smell blood?
Others
have said they
will look into
it, and still
others will be
asked. Luis
Moreno Ocampo,
when he
spotted one of
the Sri Lanka
articles, took
an interest
and opined why
"they want you
out." What he
will do is not
yet known.
A
journalist who
daily covers
not only Sri
Lanka but also
Sudan, Syria,
Western
Sahara, the
Congo and UN
corruption
shouldn't need
to go to such
lengths to be
allowed to
continue to
cover the UN.
But this is
Ban Ki-moon's
UN, seen
through the
fun house
mirror of the
UNCA
"Pioli's
Playhouse."
Watch this
site.