Inner City Press

Inner City Press -- Investigative Reporting From the Inner City to Wall Street to the United Nations

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

Google
  Search innercitypress.com Search WWW (censored?)

In Other Media-eg Nigeria, Zim, Georgia, Nepal, Somalia, Azerbaijan, Gambia Click here to contact us     .

,



Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

Subscribe to RSS feed

BloggingHeads.tv

Mar 1, '11 BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption

Video (new)

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



As Ban's Spokesman Blames UN Radio for Question, Other Answers Not Public

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, June 22 -- Just after Ban Ki-moon won his one-candidate race for five more years as UN Secretary General, when he came to the General Assembly stakeout on June 21 his final question was given to the UN's own in-house radio station.

  The question was, “hi Secretary-General, it is nice to see you again. How do you feel on this historic day and what is the message you have to the young people of the world?”

   Ban smiled and gave his longest answer at the stakeout, transcribed and put online by the UN.

  The next Inner City Press asked Ban's spokesman Martin Nesirky, “at that press encounter yesterday, it seemed that the question was granted by yourself to UN Radio, which is owned by the UN, so it’s sort of an in-house station. Is that generally accepted?”

  Nesirky, prepared for the question, said that “No, it is not generally accepted, and it shouldn’t have happened. And UN Radio staff have been reminded of what the rules are. The rules are quite clear: it is for people with press badges to ask questions.”

  Some wondered about blaming the hapless UN Radio reporter, when it was Ban's spokesman who for whatever reason devoted the last question to her, and has left the seemingly scripted answer online.

  Later on June 22 this problem was addressed by Ban taking, but the UN apparently not transcribing, by-invitation only questions, about Kashmir, Japanese engineers to South Sudan and as reported, Syria.

Ban was asked, perhaps as wishful thinking, about “speculation in Korea that you are a potential candidate for the President. Are you going to run for the presidency of the country?”


Ban & spox, Ban answers on Khartoum, UN reform & Sri Lanka not shown

  Twenty hours later, unlike his stage-managed stakeout including the child question from UN Radio, this Ban Q&A has not been transcribed and put online by the UN, even in its “off the cuff” section. To some this appeared to be a new media strategy, implemented on the first two days of Ban's new term:

Take public questions from the UN's own media and put the answers online; take questions in private from hand-selected journalists and don't put any transcript online. We'll see.

* * *

After One Candidate Race, Ban Ki-moon Takes Last Question from UN In-House Radio and not on Sudan: “Propaganda”

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, June 21 -- After Ban Ki-moon won a one candidate election as UN Secretary General for the next five years, he came to take questions from the press. There are unanswered questions swirling about the inaction in Sudan of UN peacekeepers under Ban's command, and about Ban's own inaction on war crimes in Sri Lanka.

  But with time limited, Ban's spokesman Martin Nesirky whispered in the ear of the UN TV sound man, pointing out where to give the last question.

  It was to UN Radio, the UN's own radio service, and the question was what Ban Ki-moon will do with the world's youth. Ban answered, then in the face of a request for a “question on Sudan,” Nesirky, Ban and two South Korean advisers left the UN, presumably to celebrate.

  Afterward a number of reporters said it was improper to give one of the few questions to Ban to the UN's own in-house “propaganda” station, as one reporter called it, “under Ban's UN.”

  Ban Ki-moon's big day began Tuesday with a meeting with Kim Sung-hwan the Foreign Minister of South Korea, the job Ban used to have. Then there was a billed media availability at 9:30 am about sustainable sanitation.

  Inner City Press attended, ready to ask about Ban's Panel of Experts' finding that UN peacekeepers' practices in Mirebalais, Haiti hadn't stopped feces from entering drinking water. But no questions were taken.

  At noon Inner City Press asked Ban's spokesman Nesirky, who said there had been no meeting, only the 9:30 event, four seats and a rostrum. Inner City Press asked about the Sri Lanka Killing Fields documentary -- Nesirky said Ban hasn't seen it, but that it's incorrect -- and then about GRULAC, the Latin American and Caribbean states group.

  A GRULAC member has shown Inner City Press notes from Ban's meeting with GRULAC, as which the “invisibility” of Latin America and the Caribbean in Ban's first term was critiqued. Inner City Press asked Nesirky what is Ban's response to the critique.

The immediate response is he's just come back from a long trip to four countries in Latin America,” Nesirky said.

  Inner City Press asked, so the trip was his response to the critique?

  “That's extremely frivolous,” said Nesirky, later in the day to give the UN's own in-house radio station the last question, rather than take a chance on Ban having to response to actual critiques.

 “Trips take a long time to plan," Nesirky added.

But of course the problem is more than trips. Ban may be going to the South Sudan independence ceremony on July 9, but has yet to address the inaction of UN peacekeepers under his command in Abyei and Southern Kordofan, much less questions about Darfur.

In between the questionless press (non) availability at 9:30 and this noon briefing, Ban met with his corporate Global Compact. An attendee said he left early, saying there's “something in the General Assembly... about my future,” to much laughter.

Then as the speeches began, with Bolivia having to give the speech for GRULAC, one of Ban's spokespeople pointedly asked Inner City Press, “Happy day, isn't it?” Reporters are not supposed to say (but only show). Watch this site.

* * *

On Ban's Big Day, Sanitation Presser Allows No Questions on Haiti Cholera

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, June 21 -- On the day Ban Ki-moon is slated for re-annointment for a second five year term as UN Secretary General, he appeared for a press availability about sustainable sanitation.

 But after delivering remarks and taking photos with the Prince of the Netherlands, the event ended without allowing any questions from the press.

We know it is a busy day for you, the Prince told Ban. But not so busy that Ban's spokesperson's office had not already pre-invited select media for time with Ban, in advance even of the vote on his second term.

There were questions to be answered, too, about the UN's own sanitation practices during Ban Ki-moon's first term. His own Panel of Experts on cholera in Haiti found that the sanitation practices of the Mirebalais peacekeeping base of MINUSTAH did not prevent the spread of fecal material into nearly drinking water sources. The UN largely dodged the charges: but what if anything has it learned?


Ban at his podium June 21, no questions taken (c) MRLee

  Ban's Advisory Group on Water and Sanitation has been criticized, as has been a trend in Ban's first term, as too pro-corporate and in favor of privatization, with lobbyists who have represented Suez and others.

  These type of questions, it seems, could and should have been addressed. But in the gathered crowd, Ban's speechwriter and spokesman conferred. Communications strategy, it seems, does not involve taking or answering questions, except by invitation and some say pre-arrangement. Watch this site.

* * *
As Ban Claims Libya Talks Are Led by Khatib, Jordan Activities Still UNexplained

By Matthew Russell Lee, News analysis

UNITED NATIONS, June 19 -- As Libyan rebels deny negotiating with Gaddafi, on June 18 UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's office issued a statement that “the beginnings of a negotiation process are now underway under the auspices of [Ban's] Special Envoy to Libya, Mr. Abdul-Elah Al-Khatib.”

  Khatib, who notably did not attend or engage with the African Union ministerial delegation to the UN in New York last week, has been allowed by Ban to continue as a paid Jordanian senator. Inner City Press has repeatedly asked Ban's spokesperson how this double-service for the UN and Jordan complies with the letter and spirit of UN rules.

  While Ban's lead spokesperson Martin Nesirky took to saying that Khatib's contract with the UN was still being formalized, a US diplomat on background assured Inner City Press weeks ago that it would all soon be normalized.

  But nothing has been said by Ban's office. The Obama administration has nevertheless reflexively quickly supported Ban's campaign, announced June 6, for a second five year term as Secretary General.

  As Inner City Press reported, Khatib after Ban hurriedly hired him refused to give up or suspend his political work and business in Jordan. Inner City Press asked Khatib on camera about protests and democracy in Jordan itself, and Khatib minimized the protests. Since then, with the King's convoy stoned by protesters, media that reported it were cracked down on.

  Ban's office has dodged even specifying which exemptions or special powers they may be invoking to be declaring as a UN Under Secretary General and staff member a sitting politician.


Ban and Khatib, explanation of continued Jordan business not shown

  Similarly, when asked throughout last week what safeguards will be imposed on the lobbying of Ban by his son in law Siddarth Chatterjee now that he's confirmed as hired as “Chief Diplomatic Officer” of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Nesirky has simply said there are rules and we'll comply with them.

What rules? How can the UN preach rule of law when it would even describe it own processes with regard to lobbying of the UN by members of the Secretary General's immediate family and double service for the UN fraught with conflicts of interest? Watch this site.

Click for Mar 1, '11 BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption

 Click here for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters footage, about civilian deaths in Sri Lanka.

Click here for Inner City Press' March 27 UN debate

Click here for Inner City Press March 12 UN (and AIG bailout) debate

Click here for Inner City Press' Feb 26 UN debate

Click here for Feb. 12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56

Click here for Inner City Press' Jan. 16, 2009 debate about Gaza

Click here for Inner City Press' review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate

Click here for Inner City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger

Click here from Inner City Press' December 12 debate on UN double standards

Click here for Inner City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics

and this October 17 debate, on Security Council and Obama and the UN.

* * *

These reports are usually also available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis.

Click here for a Reuters AlertNet piece by this correspondent about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click here for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali National Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an undefined trust fund.  Video Analysis here

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

UN Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Google
  Search innercitypress.com  Search WWW (censored?)

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

            Copyright 2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -