On Eve of Asia Trip, Ban Speaks Without Mentioning
Sudan, Somalia or the Congo, Corruption Questions Unanswered
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of
Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS,
June 26 -- On the eve of a two week
trip to Asia, including South Korea, China and Japan, UN
Secretary-General Ban
Ki-moon stress three issues to the press, and took nine questions, then
sped
off. He did not mention, even once, Sudan, Darfur, Chad, Somalia or the
Congo.
Ban stood
in front of the UN Security Council, whose members this month visits
these hot spots, with the exception of Somalia which was considered too
dangerous. But from this rare press availability, it appears that Ban
is ever
more disconnected from the peace and security work of the Council. UN
peacekeepers stood by while the Sudanese town of Abyei was burned.
Their
inactivity has widely been questioned, but Ban did not take a question
on the
topic, nor address it in the prepared remarks he read off note cards.
Humanitarian groups have pulled out of sections of Eastern Congo where
militias, which the UN has discussed disarming but in fact fled from,
have
targeted internally displaced people and aid workers, in a country in
which the
UN spends over $1 billion a year. But Ban did not mention the Congo.
The
questioning began with a plea that rather than these infrequently
"stand
up" interviews in front of the Security Council, Ban sit down for an
hour's questioning, as his predecessor did. There were murmurs of
agreement
from reporters, but no response from Team Ban, represented by the
Spokesperson,
the de facto chief advisor
and the Chief of Communications. Their focus on
Ban's interface with the press has centered on furniture: the music
stand he's
said to need to rest his notes on, the table for his water glass, this
time
speckled with white liquid. The fancy rostrum, one reporter joked, may
have
been flown ahead to Seoul.
The
spokesperson asked, who wants to ask a question about Zimbabwe? When
one
reporter obliged, Ban gave a prepared response. Likewise on the six
party talks
about North Korea, which Ban called "encouraging." A copy of his
response was offered, 15 minutes after he left, by the spokesperson's
office.
A reporter
from the Balkans, specifically Croatia, was called on as "Kosovo" by
the spokesperson. When some reporters laughed, it was explained that
was what
he would ask about. Whether profiling or prescreening, this makes the
omissions
of Ban's 25 minute press conference, before leaving for two weeks,
attributable
to Team Ban.
It has
been explained to Inner City Press that some questions, for example
about the
UN's $250 million no-bid contract with U.S. military contractor
Lockheed
Martin, or about whistleblowers' revelations about UN peacekeepers
giving
weapons back to militiamen in exchange for gold, are too specific for
Mr. Ban,
and should be directed elsewhere. But of two weeks of questions asked
at the
UN's noon briefing since returning from the Council's Africa trip, more
than
half have not been answered.
Ban Ki-moon from a great height, on last
trip, answers not shown
For example, just in the first
three days back from the Africa trip, on June
11 fresh off the plane questions
about child soldiers recruited by
the Justice and Equality Movement, and about the Lockheed contract,
were asked,
but have yet to be answered.
Inner City Press: What’s the UN
going to do, given that there are 89 child soldiers in the custody of
the
Sudanese? Is there any attempt to get
them released?
Spokesperson: I'll ask that
question for you.
Inner City Press: The other
question has to do with the Lockheed-Martin PAE contract.
While there, the Sudanese said the UN had
asked for a three-month extension of the contract, which they granted
until
July, but their position was that there would be no more extensions and
no
visas would be given to Lockheed personnel.
What's the process for the UN giving a contract to a
new contractor,
since Sudan won't give more visas?
Spokesperson: This
question should be directed to
peacekeeping, but I'll find out for you.
The waiting continues. So too on question the next
day, June
12, about peacekeeping
and corruption:
Inner
City Press: there's a report that a man by the name of Alain Le Roy is
going to
become the new head of Peacekeeping Operations, that his name has been
forwarded by France as their candidate.
Is that something you can comment on?
Spokesperson: Not at this point. I’ve read the reports, like you have, but I
don’t have any response.
Inner
City Press: Also, there's a report put out yesterday by the ACABQ that
responded to the Secretary-General’s report on the DPKO/DFS (Department
of
Field Services) split. Their report is
pretty critical. They said they expected
more transparency, that the roles between DPKO and DFS are still not
well
defined. What’s the response of the
Secretariat to that?
Spokesperson: We have to wait. ACABQ has sent that report and, of course,
there will be formal answers to the States.
Question: Also, there's a report
today, that the
procurement task force report on the Department of Economic and Social
Affairs
(DESA) and Mr. Bertucci has become public.
And supposedly it says the DESA Thessalonica Centre
is a long-standing
controversy. And it states that, as
reported, Mr. Bertucci was grossly negligent and had big problems in
the hiring
of contractors. He then was quoted in
the newspapers as saying he’s been entirely exonerated.
What’s the status of that report and is
something going to be decided before he retires in six weeks in terms
of either
discipline or no discipline?
Spokesperson: I’ll check
on that for you.
This waiting also continues, as Mr. Bertucci
approaches retirement and
taking his pension. In fact, he was listed as the sponsor of a concert
in the
UN on June 23.
Increasingly, one hears
member
states wondering why Ban Ki-moon is gone all the time. One
place he went was Myanmar, but on that,
too, answers are not given. From June
13
Inner
City Press; There's a report in the Washington Post today that the
Government
of Myanmar, a week after the hurricane hit, started giving large
parcels of
land in the delta to business people described as cronies of the regime. Is the UN aware of that report and how would
this modify the UN approach to Myanmar?
Spokesperson: I don’t
think we have an independent report
on that so I cannot confirm or deny. We
can try to look into it, but I don’t know whether our teams on the
ground have
been able to assess that. But we can
check, of course, for you.
But nothing has been said. The
above are example from only three consecutive days. To be continued,
until at
least some of these questions are taken and answered.
Note: Ban will make one more
appearance before select media in New York in
advance is his trip. Thursday night at the Japan Society, in an event
cosponsored by the Korea Society, Ban will discuss... "contributions
from North East Asia."
* * *
These reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click
here for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017 USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|