Amid
UN
Praise of Arab Spring, a One Candidate Coronation of Ban Begins
By
Matthew
Russell Lee, News Analysis
UNITED
NATIONS,
June 6 -- While leaders in the UN loudly praised the Arab
Spring as a move toward democracy, Ban Ki-moon is being anointed
without any competition or even debate for another five year term as
Secretary General.
If
democracy is
good in the Middle East, why not in the UN itself? Wouldn't a more
formal process, including questions ranging from Libya through human
rights to the budget,
benefit the UN and its legitimacy?
Even
the
International Monetary Fund, derided for lack of transparency, last
month announced a process whereby candidates can put in their names
by June 10, with three or four to be interviewed and a decision made
by June 30.
At
the UN by
contrast, there is no deadline, and no explanation of the sudden
rush. Much is made of the lack of other candidates, but no formal
process for nominations was ever announced.
There is no
transparency: the Security Council could take up and adopt, without
vote, the dipositive resolution without any notice to the public, in
any closed door consultations as early as today.
Ban & Gaddafi: one candidate elections not shown
Some
have said
Ban would like to do it with the Presidents of Gabon and Nigeria in
town: that is, on the margins of Tuesday's speeches about HIV / AIDS.
Beginning
with an
Inner City Press report
midday on Friday that Ban would meet with the
Asia Group on Monday morning then announce to the press Monday at
11:30, it has been widely reported that the process has begun (and
just as widely predicted that there is no opposition.)
Monday
in the UN's
North Lawn Building, Inner City Press observed a slew of high UN
official going up to Ban's third floor office: Alain Le Roy and
Susana Malcorra of Peacekeeping, information technology's Mr. Choi,
manager in waiting Franz Baumann -- whom Inner City Press thanked for
a recent written answer -- Ban's Special Adviser on Africa and other
issues, and top Political adviser Lynn Pascoe, who told Inner City
Press “it's just the boss holding his normal Monday morning
meeting.” We'll see.
* * *
Amid
UN
Complaints on Ban Ki-moon's "Arbitrary" 3.7% Budget Cuts, His
Pre-Coronation Is Reported
By
Matthew
Russell Lee, News Analysis
UNITED
NATIONS,
June 5 -- Even before it is decided who should
be UN
Secretary General from 2012 through 2016, news wire services have
predicted with “100%” accuracy that Ban Ki-moon will and should
be re-appointed, quoting unnamed “UN diplomats.”
But
why? Beyond
questions about silence on human rights issues, and compromising the
UN's purported impartiality in Cote d'Ivoire and elsewhere, on June 3
members of the UN's budget advisory committee complained to Inner
City Press about Ban's just-made budget proposal.
“He said it
would be a three percent across the board cut,” a member of the UN
Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Affairs told Inner
City Press. “Then he comes in with three point seven, but
implemented very haphazardly. There are no cuts to UN Women, but
larger cuts to other departments.”
Another
ACABQ
source wondered why member states would move so quickly to rubber
stamp Ban for five more years right after he made a controversial but
still secret budget proposal.
“This wouldn't
happen in any democracy in the world,” the source said. In these
fiscal times, how leaders proposal budgets is the major issue to
judge them on. "Ban just dropped this one on us, the member states
haven't even debated or even heard it -- and they want to give him a
second term?”
Ban with Zoellick &
DSK: successor & musical chairs not shown
Beyond
this, as
Inner City Press has pointed out since the resignation of Dominique
Strauss-Kahn as head of the IMF and before, if that now vacant post
goes to an Asian or even South Korean, it would change the UN
balance, and quite possible bring out another candidate for the top
UN spot.
If
Ban is
preaching democracy, why not at least wait to see if a competing
candidate emerges? Watch this site.
* * *
At
UN
on 2d Term for Ban, “No One Else Wants the Job,” a P-5 DPR Tells Press,
Asia Group
to Prejudge IMF Race?
By
Matthew
Russell Lee, News Analysis
UNITED
NATIONS,
June 5 -- With Ban Ki-moon
24 hours away from seeking Asian
Group backing for a second term as UN Secretary General, already
arguments are being made that Ban this year made up for his quiet on
human rights by promoting air strikes in Cote d'Ivoire and Libya.
But
the
performance of the UN in Cote d'Ivoire under Ban's close ally Choi
Young-jin, who acted as Ban's campaign manager to be selected
Secretary General on 2006, has come into question explicitly on human
rights grounds.
On
June 2, Inner
City Press asked Ban's spokesperson's office for its response to
charges that the UN stood by as Alassane Outtara's forces carried out
reprisal killings in Abidjan. Their inaction in Duekoue is already
under investigation.
Ban appears
to not even be monitoring the
bombing of Libya, even amid reports of collateral damage and the use
of mercenaries.
On
Friday June 3
after Inner City Press reported on
the Asia Group's breakfast with
Ban set for Monday morning -- not listed on Ban's schedule as of
the
weekend -- other reports followed quoting unnamed UN diplomats
supporting and promoting Ban's bid.
While
no one, it
seems, wants to speak entirely on the record about Ban, on Friday the
Deputy Permanent Representative of a Permanent member of the Security
Council told Inner City Press that there are no other alternative
candidates to Ban, adding “maybe nobody else wants the job.”
If
you use the
UN S-G post this way, some wonder, who but a red carpet and travel
addict
would want it?
The
structural
problem is the need to please all of the Permanent Five during a
first time, in order to get a second. A solution would be to limit
Secretaries General to a single term, perhaps of seven years.
As
to the Asia
Group casting their lot with a second term by Ban on June 6, to some
this seems to preclude the International Monetary Fund post going to
an Asian, or perhaps even a developing world candidate. Is this the
right move for the Asia Group? What exactly is the rush to act before
the IMF decides on June 30, or even before the June 10 court decision
on whether a case will proceed against Europe's, or at least
France's, IMF candidate to replace Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Christine
Lagarde?
Could
it be, some ask, that those who most supported Ban's and his Choi's
attack helicopter raids in Cote d'Ivoire feel similarly about this
pre-emptive action in the IMF replacement race?
DSK
is in court in
lower Manhattan on June 6, but no final decision about his future
will be made there. Must it be different in Turtle Bay? Watch this
site.
* * *
At
UN,
Ban
Poised to Announce for 2d Term on June 6, Amid Critiques &
IMF Intrigue
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
June
3 -- After months of no-comments
from UN
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon about seeking a second term, on
Friday
things heated up. A Security Council member's spokesman told Inner
City Press to “be on the look-out early next week,” then
specified that Ban would announce his intention on June 6.
After
Ban's
office
announced he will hold a press conference at 11:30 on Monday, June 6,
another delegate told Inner City Press that an Asian Group breakfast
is being organized for that morning, and said it was for Ban to
announce.
A
Chinese diplomat
told Inner City Press that his country firmly believes that the top
position in the UN for the next five years belongs to Asia -- and
that the next head of the International Monetary Fund should come
from the developing world.
Some
are
surprised
that Ban would announce while the nomination
process to replace
Dominique Strauss Kahn at the IMF is still open. If that post goes
to
an Asian, from China or much less likely a South
Korean, that would
change Ban's claim to a second term.
Since
the
IMF
nomination process ends on June 10, and the winner will be named on
June 30 or before, “what's the sudden rush?” a delegate asked
Inner City Press.
There
are
critiques
of Ban Ki-moon circulating, among them his fast speaking
out against any aid flotillas to Gaza, his inaction on
his own Panel
of Experts' report on war crimes in Sri Lanka and more general
failure to speak out on human rights and media freedom (raised by the
Committee to Protect Journalists, HRW and others)and a general lack
of reform
and pizazz.
Perhaps this explains the rush, before
these
various issues develop further. Watch this site.
Click
for Mar 1, '11
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption
Click
here
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12
debate
on
Sri
Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis
here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office:
S-453A,
UN,
NY
10017
USA
Tel:
212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile
(and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier
Inner
City
Press
are
listed
here,
and
some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08
Inner
City
Press,
Inc.
To
request
reprint
or
other
permission,
e-contact
Editorial
[at]
innercitypress.com
-
|