On
Myanmar, UN's Ban Says He Can't Speak, Press Must Fight
for Access Even to Ministers
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of
Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS,
Sept. 27, updated -- A year
after monks
were beaten in the streets by Myanmar's military government, UN
Secretary
General Ban Ki-moon convened a Saturday meeting of his Group of
Friends of Myanmar
in the
basement of the UN. He was scheduled to speak to the Press about
Myanmar after
the meeting, at 12:45 pm. But at 9:50 am, Ban's Spokesperson announced
that his
press availability was being cancelled.
It was
explained that Ban could not
speak until a statement had been agreed on. To some this seemed
strange.
Previous Secretary General Kofi Annan, for example, would speak to the
press on
his way in and out of meetings and in the hall, particularly if human
rights
were involved. Another rationalizer of the cancellation of Ban's press
availability proffered that his schedule was too tight. But between a
11:10 meeting with Jose Ramos-Horta of Timor-Leste there was only the
Myanmar meeting, until a 3:40 p.m. meeting with Foreign Minister of
Algiers.
Several UN
correspondents interested in Myanmar then sought to at least gain
access to the
area in front of the meeting room, so that if attendees
of the Friends of
Myanmar meeting wanted to speak to the Press, about the meeting or
the
anniversary of the crushed Saffron Revolution, they could. But the
journalists
were told that since Ban cancelled his press availability, they would
not be
allowed to stand by the meeting room, even behind metal barricades. [See update below.]
Ban Ki-moon and Myanmar minister on Saturday,
press availability not shown
Advocacy was made; various UN officials said
that it was others, not them, that had the power to restore press
access to the
area in front of the meeting room. Reporters including Inner City Press
were
blocked by UN Security and watched as a flotilla of foreign ministers
swept
down an escalator and into the meeting room. "We're getting screwed,"
one of the reporters said. "This is like what Than Shwe does in his new
capital in the middle of the jungle."
Whether
that statement, not by Inner City Press, is hyperbole or not, it is
undeniable
that the sequence of events, the cancellation of Ban's press
availability and
then the barring of reporters from the area, would make it more
difficult to
cover the Myanmar issue, and might even result in some publications not
running
a story they otherwise would have. Such stories inevitably would
mention the
widespread analysis that Ban's envoy Ibrahim Gambari's most recent trip
to
Myanmar, during which he met with neither Than Shwe nor democracy
leader Aung
San Suu Kyi, was a failure. Some surmise that this is the coverage
that the UN Secretariat
is trying to avoid. For this supposition, they point to the UN's
19 days of silence after Gambari left Myanmar.
After Press
advocacy for access, the reporters who had waited by the security
checkpoint
were finally let through. Inner City Press asked French Ambassador
Jean-Maurice
Ripert what he hoped to accomplish with the meeting. "The mobilization
of
the international community," he said. "The freeing of political
prisoners."
In
fairness, even if Ban had followed through on the promised press
availability
at 12:45, the press was only going to be allowed into the area in front
of the
meeting room at 12:30. So, after
advocacy, being allowed in, at 11:15 resulted in more time near the
meeting
room than had been promised. On the other hand, why would the UN decide
that
its Secretary General was unable to speak to the press about a serious
human
rights and humanitarian issue like Myanmar until some statement had
been agreed
to?
Also in fairness, it may
be that the UN has
little leverage. But among its leverage is the ability to speak.
Javier
Solana of the European Union also stopped to speak to Inner City Press.
"What do you hope to accomplish with the meeting?" Solana said,
"To support the Secretary-General."
News analysis: But support the
Secretary-General in what,
with respect to Myanmar?
Update of 12:14 p.m. -- Now it's
said that UK Minister Milliband will speak to the Press, at the
stakeout access to which was won only through advocacy.
Update of 1:02
p.m. -- Singapore's Foreign Minister
emerged to speak of signs of progress and the need for economic
development in
Myanmar. Inner City Press asked if Ban should go to Myanmar if Aung San
Suu Kyi
is still under house arrest. He said that the correcting timing of a
Ban visit
must be carefully considered, but would not give more details. "Let me
go
back into the meeting," he said. The UK has confirmed that Milliband
will
speak. What will he say when asked when and if Ban should go to Myanmar?
On the
sidelines, a Deputy Permanent Representative of an ASEAN member state,
also
member of the Group of Friends, laughed when told Ban thought he
couldn't speak
on the issue until the Group had a statement, and said, of course he
can speak,
he was probably asked not to, pointing out that Ban met with Myanmar's
foreign
minister at 9:40. (At 9:50 Ban's 12:45 press availability was
cancelled.)
Update of 1:42 p.m. -- After Ban
Ki-moon walked
waving by the reconstituted stakeout at which the Singaporean and UK
Ministers
spoke, his Spokesperson's office issued a statement, which did not
allow for
any questions or answers. But here it is, in full:
Statement
attributable to the Spokesperson for Secretary-General
on
the High-Level Meeting of the Group of Friends on Myanmar
Today,
the Secretary-General convened and
chaired the first high-level meeting of the Group of Friends of the
Secretary-General on Myanmar. This was
the sixth meeting of the Group since it was established in December
2007.
The
Secretary-General thanks all the
Friends for their high-level participation in a useful and constructive
discussion.
He also welcomes the participation by the Ministers from several
concerned
countries as well as by the Secretary-General of the Association of
Southeast
Asian Nations [ASEAN] and the High Representative of the European Union
[EU],
in today’s meeting. This is a clear signal of the importance that the
international community attaches to the situation in Myanmar.
The
members of the Group were unanimous
in expressing their continued strong support for the
Secretary-General’s good
offices and for its implementation through his Special Adviser, Mr.
Ibrahim
Gambari.
While
noting the recent actions taken by
the Government of Myanmar, members of the Group also further encouraged
it to
work more closely with and respond more positively with the United
Nations good
offices to address key issues of concern to the international
community,
especially the release of political prisoners, including Daw Aung San
Suu Kyi,
and the initiation of an all-inclusive dialogue between the Government
and the opposition.
Members
of the Group encouraged all
parties in Myanmar to seize the opportunity of the UN good offices,
while
stressing the responsibility of the Myanmar Government to demonstrate
its stated
commitment to cooperation with the good offices through further
tangible
results.
New York, 27 September 2008
Watch this site, and this Sept. 18 (UN) debate.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click
here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|