On
Cambodia
Genocide
Court & UN Quittings in Protests, Ban Ki-moon Puts Off
Substantive Comment for 2d Term
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
June
14 -- A week after Ban Ki-moon on June 6 met with the
Asia Group of states at the UN seeking a second term as Secretary
General, controversy swirled around the dropping of a genocide case
by the UN affiliated Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia.
On
June 13, Inner
City Press asked Ban's spokesman Martin Nesirky:
Inner
City
Press:
a number of international staff have left because the
third case was sort of suspended without investigation by the judges.
So, it says, this is what I wanted to ask you, it said that these
staff members wrote to the Secretary-General before they quit. I
wanted to know if that’s true and I wanted to know what he thinks,
given the controversy
that
surrounded his visit to Cambodia; does he
have any comment at all on what is viewed as sort of disorder in the
court or shutting down of the inquiry into the Khmer Rouge era there?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
Probably
a little later today, Matthew.
During
Ban's
trip
to Cambodia last October, Hun Sen spoke of the removal of the head of
the UN human rights office in Phnom Penh, Christophe
Peschoux.
Ban
offered little defense of him. Nesirky called it “an internal
personnel matter” and when Peschoux left earlier this year,
Nesirky's office through his deputy Farhan Haq had “no comment at
this time,” or since.
But
on June 13 a
comment was promised, and 24 hours it was issued -- a statement on
the ECCC. The statement is long and detailed but is hardly responsive
to the human rights and accountability questions raised. As on
Peschoux, it says that Ban's UN will “not comment on internal
United Nations administrative or staffing processes.”
Eschewing
comment, it says that public scrutiny will come at some unspecified
later date. Ban is expected, with Asia Group support, to get a
second five year term as Secretary General on June 16 in the Security
Council, then June 21 in the General Assembly.
Ban in Cambodia, Peschoux
and
Ban
follow through on human rights & ECCC not shown
Here is the
statement:
STATEMENT
ATTRIBUTABLE
TO
THE SPOKESPERSON FOR THE SECRETARY-GENERAL
Extraordinary
Chambers
in
the Courts of Cambodia
Support
for
the independence of the judiciary is a fundamental principle that the
United Nations upholds in Cambodia as elsewhere. The judges and
prosecutors at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia
(ECCC) must be allowed to function free from external interference by
the Royal Government of Cambodia, the United Nations, donor States,
and civil society.
It
follows
that the United Nations categorically rejects media speculation that
we have instructed the Co-Investigating Judges to dismiss Case 003. It
similarly follows that the United Nations will not comment on
issues which remain the subject of judicial consideration, nor
speculate on actions that should or should not be taken by the judges
or prosecutors in any case. As is normal practice, the United
Nations will also not comment on internal United Nations
administrative or staffing processes related to the ECCC. The United
Nations will ensure that the international component of the ECCC,
including the Office of the Co-Investigating Judges, has sufficient
resources to undertake its work.
The
announcement made by the Co-Investigating Judges on 29 April 2011
that they have decided to conclude their investigation in Case 003,
is an interim procedural step. Issues related to that decision will
be the subject of further consideration by the Co-Investigating
Judges, the Co-Prosecutors, and the Pre-Trial Chamber. Any other
proceedings that may be initiated by the Co-Investigating Judges will
also be subject to the independent judicial process.
The
Co-Investigating Judges are not under an obligation to provide
reasons for their actions at this stage of the investigation in Case
003. Consistent with the civil law system of the Kingdom of Cambodia,
judicial investigations at the ECCC are not conducted in public, and
all persons participating in a judicial investigation must generally
maintain confidentiality.
The
Co-Investigating Judges must ultimately issue a Closing Order in Case
003 which, in relation to each suspect, either sends him or her to
trial, or dismisses the case against him or her. The Closing Order
must include reasons, which will appropriately be available for
public scrutiny. Speculating on the content of the Closing Order at
this stage does not assist the independent judicial process.
The
United
Nations, working closely with donor States, will continue to strongly
support the work of the ECCC. The ECCC is currently preparing to
commence the trial in Case 002 on 27 June 2011. The accused in case
two are the four remaining leaders of the Khmer Rouge, including
Khieu Samphan, the former Head of State; and Nuon Chea, ‘brother
number two’ to Pol Pot. Their trial will be of true international
significance, and deserves the ongoing, strong support of the
international community.
New
York,
14
June 2011
* * *
After
Ban
Ki-moon
Said
Stood Behind UN Rights Rep in Cambodia, His Leaving Draws
No
Reaction, like ECCC
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
May
9
-- When UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon visited
Cambodia last October, Prime Minister Hun Sen “ordered” him to
remove the head of the UN human rights office in Phnom Penh, Christophe
Peschoux.
Inner
City Press asked
Ban's spokesman Martin Nesirky about it. Nesirky
called it an “internal personnel matter,” then added that Ban
stands behind the office and, by implication, its staff.
Now
six months later, Peschoux
has
been
chased from the country. Human
rights groups call it “worrying.” Mr. Peschoux
himself
has
said
that in Cambodia
“human
rights are tolerated to the extent that they do not challenge the
political, economic and financial interests of the ruling elite.
That’s where the red line runs. If you cross that line, trouble
starts... Of course I’m leaving because it has become impossible
for me to continue to operate in this environment.”
Given
this, one might have expected Ban Ki-moon to have some follow up
comment, if not to have actually defended Mr. Peschoux. But when
Inner City Press on May 9 asked Ban's acting deputy spokeman Farhan
Haq about Peschoux's leaving Cambodia, Haq said “we do not have any
comment at this stage,” nor “any reaction.”
Back
on April 12, Inner City Press had asked
Haq
about
Cambodia:
Inner
City
Press:
there
is a lot of controversy about the UN-backed Court
[Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia] there. Some are
saying that the President told Ban Ki-moon that there should be no
more prosecutions and that the Court should be wound down. And
advocates are saying that the UN hasn’t spoken up in defence of the
Court’s mandate. Does the Secretary-General have a view on whether
this Court should go on in a non-politicized fashion, or, as many
say, should be moving to dismiss future cases beyond those it has?
Acting
Deputy
Spokesperson
Haq:
The Secretary-General fully supports the
work of the Extraordinary Chambers in Cambodia, and he believes that
it is up, ultimately, to the senior officials of the Extraordinary
Chambers to proceed with their work as they see fit.
Since
then,
concerns
have
only grown. Ban Ki-moon and human rights: que pasa? Watch
this site.