Inner City
Press and the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
have also
asked about
freedom of
expression in
Bangladesh -
and relatedly
at the UN,
when a
journalist
asking questions
at the UN had
his media
blocked back
in Bangladesh.
While the UN Spokesman
replied that
he had spoken
with the journalist
in questions
-- which was
not the point
-- from
elsewhere in
the UN to the
request for
action, no
response. Now
the journalist
and four
colleagues
have had their
accreditations
pulled.
Inner
City Press on
March 5 asked
UN Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric if
the UN had any
involvement in
a statement
urging
de-escalation
issued by a
group of
Ambassadors in
Dhaka. I am not
aware that we
have any
involvement in
that, the UN
Spokesman
replied. Video
here. Why
not?
Why didn't UN
political affairs
chief Jeffrey
Feltman, who
spent days in
Myanmar then
Sri Lanka,
make a push to
visit Bangladesh
at this time?
Did he? His
office has not
answered
questions
about his Sri
Lanka trip,
but Dujarric
says he will
answer
questions on March
6. Only about
Ukraine? Watch
this site.
The UN makes
many vague and
grandiose
statements
about its
commitment to
freedom of the
press. But
when a
journalist who
asked
questions at
its noon
briefing about
Bangladesh had
his family's
house in Dhaka
visited by the
authorities,
and his
media's
website
blocked, what
did the UN do?
Not much, it
seems. After
asking the UN
Spokesperson
and others in
the UN in
writing, Inner
City Press for
the Free UN
Coalition for
Access asked
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric what
he or the UN
had done. Video here.
All that
Dujarric would
say is that he
had spoken
with the
journalist.
But what does
that
accomplish?
Anything said
publicly? Or
(next story)
to the
country?
Apparently
not.
On February 28
Inner City
Press for
FUNCA asked
the
Spokesperson:
1)
[The
journalist]
who has been
asking
questions
about
Bangladesh at
the noon
briefing of
late and about
whom Inner
City Press
asked on
February 27
now says that
his media has
now been
blocked in
Bangladesh,
and he fears
for the safety
of his spouse
and two
children
there.
2) please
explain the
correction
today by your
office,
changing
“saddened” to
“condemn” --
was any
complain
received by
the UN about
the failure to
condemn? Was
the initial
(or second)
statement
prepared by
the Department
of Political
Affairs?
And
only this
answer came:
"the statement
resissue was
due clerical
error on our
part. Nothing
more. On
the rest we"ll
revert."
But
there was no
reversion. By
March 2,
nothing on it.
Nor from
elsewhere in
the UN system
where it and
more was
sent. So
the question
was asked at
the March 2 UN
noon briefing.
We'll have
more on this.
Inner
City Press:
Press freedom
question, both
in Bangladesh
and about
Bangladesh
here.
One, there was
a pretty
high-profile
hacking to
death of a
blogger in
Bangladesh
named Avijit
Roy, and I'm
wondering
whether the UN
system, CPJ
and others
have denounced
it for obvious
reasons.
What does the
UN say about
that?
And also our
colleague
who's asked a
number of
questions here
about
Bangladesh, I
tried to ask
MALU yesterday
whether it was
true as
reported in
Bangladesh
that the
Government of
Bangladesh or
mission made
some inquiry
with the UN
trying to
essentially
question his
accreditation
or make it so
he couldn't
ask questions
here.
And I wanted
to know,
what's the
position of
the UN on such
inquiries?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
The UN's
position is if
somebody meets
the
accreditation
criteria, they
are welcome in
this room and
they are
welcome to ask
any
questions.
I may cut them
off if the
preamble to
their question
is too long,
but that's
just my
chair's
prerogative.
Inner City
Press:
Is it
appropriate
for Member
States to try
to
essentially,
like, cherry
pick what
journalists
get to ask
questions?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
The point is
that once
they're in
this room,
they're
allowed to ask
whatever they
want.
Okay? On
the attack of
the blogger,
we spoke to
our human
rights
colleagues who
obviously
condemned the
attack and
expressed the
hope that the
perpetrators
will be
quickly
brought to
justice
through the
due process of
law, and
they've added
that it's
obviously very
important that
the space for
freedom of
expression in
civil society
be upheld in
Bangladesh.
After the
briefing,
Inner City
Press and
FUNCA were
informed that
the referenced
journalist --
not the
murdered
blogger -- had
his media's
website
blocked in
Bangladesh,
where there
have been
arrests for
carrying
placards, and
threats
against the
Daily Star for
publishing
photographs of
posters. We'll
have more on
this.
Inner
City Press: I
wanted to ask,
beyond just
the arrest
warrant
against Zia,
there's a Mr.
Mahmudur Manna
has been
arrested for
trying to stir
up the army
and he's been
arrested by
something
called the
Rapid Action
Battalion,
RAB. The
reason I'm
asking is
research
discovers that
Mohammad [UN
transcript
claims
"inaudible"
but it is
Muhammad
Matiur Rahman]
of this Rapid
Action
Battalion
named in a
filing that
was directed
to ICC is
reportedly
about to take
up a position
within
MONUSCO.
I've been
asking you
this a number
of
times.
You'd said
that the UN
has all these
concerns, but
given that
much of the
violence in
Bangladesh is
allegedly
perpetrated by
the military
that's
contributing
soldiers, I'm
naming this
name as a
sample
case.
What does DPKO
[Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations] do
to review the
people coming
in?
There are
other
conflicts…
Spokesman
Dujarric:
I
understand.
I've heard
your
question.
I tried to
answer to the
best of my
ability
yesterday when
you last asked
it. You
know, I have
no specific
information on
the case that
you mention or
the people you
mention.
There are
procedures in
place in order
to ensure that
DPKO uniformed
personnel meet
the
requirements
that we have
and also in
terms of human
rights.
If I have any
information on
those specific
cases, I will
share them
with you.
But still,
nothing, from
UN
Peacekeeping
run by Herve
Ladsous.
On
February 24
Inner City
Press on
behalf of the
new Free
UN Coalition
for Access
asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
the Bangladesh
government's
threats
against the
media there,
specifically
the Daily
Star.
Now the these
strands have
come together,
the UN's and
UN
Peacekeeping's
dubious
commitment to
human rights
and a lack of
press freedom
in Bangladesh
-- and in the
UN.
The Kaler
Kantho
newspaper in
Bangladesh,
saying that
questions
about human
rights and
Bangladesh's
military
should not be
asked at the
UN's noon
briefing, has
favorably
cited the
UN
Correspondents
Association in
its support,
reporting (as
auto-translated)
that ICP
"United
Nations
Correspondents
Association
iuenasie)
faced
investigation.
He was
threatened
with expulsion
from the
iuenasie was
reported that
the UK's
Guardian
newspaper. His
reputation for
investigative
journalism in
the United
Nations." Click
here to view,
then translate.
"has
been
responsible
for breaking
several
stories about
the UN, has..
also written
stories
accusing the
UNCA
president,
Giampaolo
Pioli, of a
conflict of
interest
involving Sri
Lanka (see
here).
Lee is
regarded as
the UN
department of
public
information's
least-favourite
journalist
because he is
persistent, is
willing to ask
uncomfortable
questions, and
has cultivated
an impressive
network of
sources within
the UN. UNCA
is a
self-governing
body and
membership is
not a
prerequisite
for obtaining
UN press
credentials,
which are
granted by the
UN media
accreditation
and liaison
unit (MALU).
So Lee's
expulsion
would not
automatically
deprive him of
UN access.
However, it is
possible that
it might weigh
in the balance
when he next
applies for
credentials."
In fact, Inner
City Press was
never expelled
by UNCA --
they didn't
have the votes
-- but quit
the
organization
in disgust
once its term
on the board
expired, and
co-founded the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access.
Now, Kaler
Kanthro
continues
after citing
UNCA, the UN's
Censorship
Alliance,, the
Bangladesh
government is
trying to ask
the UN - and
US State
Department -
credentials of
those who ask
questions
about human
rights abuse
and censorship
in the
country. At
the UN,
they've found
the UN
Censorship
Alliance. But
this time,
there's FUNCA.
Inner
City Press: On
Bangladesh, it
seems like the
violence is
escalating but
my question to
you is about a
statement by
current Prime
Minister
Sheikh Hasina
where she says
a publication,
The Daily
Star, legal
action should
be taken for
publishing a
photograph of
a poster
campaign of
protesters in
the
street.
I’m wondering
first if you
have any
response to
that and also
if you have
anything new.
I know there
was a request
to go.
Where do
things stand
as people seem
to be getting
disappeared et
cetera?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
I don’t have
an update for
you on that
except
obviously to
say that we
support
freedom of
expression and
the right for
newspapers to
exist, which
is a big part
of democracy
in any
country.
But what about
using
"peacekeepers"
who have been
involved in
the
violence?
We noted that
we'd have more
on Herve
Ladsous'
failure to vet
Bangladesh's
"peacekeepers,"
now as his
DPKO won't
answer this
basic
question.
Ladsous
refuses Press
questions: video here and here,
Vine
here.
(UNCA did
nothing about
this, quite
the contrary.)
Inner City
Press has
raised these
questions: is
Colonel Imran
Ibne A. Rouf
serving UN
Peacekeeping?
A filing
addressed to
the
International
Criminal Court
says he
"abducted
seven innocent
civilians from
a place near
Dhaka Central
Jail;" they
were all
killed.
What about
Colonel Amin,
Director of
National
Security
Intelligence,
now reportedly
serving in
Ladsous'
MINUSCA
mission in the
Central
African
Republic,
along with Lt
Col Mazid, who
was commanding
officer of
Rapid Action
Battalion 10?
In Ladsous and
Martin
Kobler's
MONUSCO
mission in the
DR Congo,
where a Cote
d'Ivoire
diplomat was
allowed to
sell UN Police
positions
(clear here
for that Inner
City Press
exclusive),
please explain
the presence
of Lt Col
Shiraj , Lt
Col Mofazzal
and Lt Col
Khandakar
Mahmud, all
three of whom
were in the
Bangladesh
Border Guards?
In Ladsous'
mission in
Mali, accused
like the mission
in Haiti of
shooting at
unarmed
demonstrators,
please explain
the presence
of Lt Col
Munir, Lt Col
Faruq, Lt Col
Shamsul Kabir
and Lt
Col Mustafiz,
all of whom
were in the
Bangladesh
Border Guards,
and another
Maj Mustafiz,
from the
Directorate-General
of Forces
Intelligence?
As
to Bangladesh
this comes
after it
emerged that
Ban Ki-moon
sent January
30 letter(s)
to the
country, even
though the
government
there says
they only got
the letter
much later.
What explains
the delay?
When
on February 5
Inner City
Press asked
the UN,
which uses
Bangladesh
soldiers as
peacekeepers,
this ensued:.
So what if
anything is
the UN doing?
Watch this
site.