Citigroup - Wachovia Approved by Fed and Bush,
Public and CRA Excluded, Laws Repealed?
Byline: Matthew R. Lee of Inner
City Press on Wall Street: News Analysis
NEW YORK,
September 29 -- With Monday morning's
announcement that Citigroup, whose subprime write-off helped hearken
the
current financial crisis, will buy Wachovia at fire sale prices with no
public
comment, banking law has been turned on its head or repealed. Bank
mergers and
conversions are supposed to be subject to public notice and comment,
unless in
emergencies such as failure and FDIC take-over. But last Sunday the
Federal
Reserve gave immediate approval to applications by Morgan Stanley and
Goldman
Sachs to convert to bank holding companies.
A week
later, Citigroup is shielded
from public comment without its target, Wachovia, being taken over by
the FDIC.
Henceforth regulators can exclude the public for any reason, or no
reason at
all. And the same predatory lenders who brought about the crisis now
stand to
benefit from it.
On
September 22, Inner City Press asked Federal Reserve chairman Ben
Bernanke on
what legal basis he has rubber-stamped Goldman and Morgan applications.
Bernanke scoffed that legal authority existed, to talk to the Fed's top
lawyer,
who was in the room. He in turn pointed to a 2 a.m. press release which
mentioned emergency and that the transactions would be "consummated
immediately." Thus, no court could review the Fed's decision to exclude
the public. Any case filed for review would be moot. Click here for
that story.
Wachovia: takeover rubber-stamp approvals in
a blur
When
the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, a unit of the Treasury
Department,
later in the week rubber-stamped JPMorgan Chase's acquisition of most
of
Washington Mutual, at least it could cite to the FDIC's involvement.
But on
Citigroup - Wachovia, the FDIC has bragged that Wachovia did not fail
and was
never in receivership. How then can the public be excluded? But the
press
release states:
"Citigroup Inc. will acquire the
banking operations of
Wachovia Corporation; Charlotte, North Carolina, in a transaction
facilitated
by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and concurred with by the
Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve and the Secretary of the Treasury in
consultation with the President."
So
the President
approves bank mergers without any public notice or comment. Since the
Community
Reinvestment Act is only enforced during the public comment period on
merger
applications, the CRA is effectively being repealed.
Backstory
First on the fringes
and now on Fox News, the Community Reinvestment Act is being blamed by
some for
today's financial crisis. The argument is that by encouraging
FDIC-insured
banks to lend in lower income neighborhoods, the government -- read,
Democrats,
from Jimmy Carter to Bill Clinton -- created the explosion in high
interest
rate subprime loans.
There's a major factual problem, though: with a single
exception, no bank sought CRA credit for its subprime loans. And the
investment
banks which were purchasing, bundling and securitizing the loans were
not
covered by CRA. Bear
Stearns was not covered by CRA, but was bailed
out by the
Federal Reserve Board for $30 billion dollars. AIG, an
insurance company, was
not covered by CRA, but its subprime activities have led to a $75
billion loan
from the Federal Reserve, whose chairman Ben Bernanke
nevertheless claimed to Inner City Press that the Fed does
not control AIG, despite owning warrants for 79% of its stock, click here for
that story.
In fact,
community advocates had been telling the Federal Reserve about the
dangers of
subprime lending since the 1990s. For
example, Bronx-based Fair Finance Watch commented to the Federal
Reserve about
the practices of now-defunct non-bank subprime lender New Century, when
U.S.
Bancorp bought warrants for 24% of New Century's stock. The Fed, rather
than
take any action on New Century, merely waited until U.S. Bancorp sold
off some
of the warrants, and then said the issue was moot.
Likewise,
when community groups from all over the country complained
to the Office of Thrift Supervision about the subprime practices of
Washington
Mutual's affiliate Long Beach Mortgage, the OTS responded that is was
only
concerned with WaMu's savings bank, not its finance company. WaMu never
got CRA
credit for Long Beach's loans, but now WaMu has failed and been bought
at fire
sale prices by bottom-feeder JPMorgan Chase.
Prince of Citi, growth in subprime had nothing to do with CRA
The list
goes on and on. Non-U.S. institutions that now stand to benefit from
the
bailout bill being quickly considered in Congress are not covered by
the CRA:
UBS of Switzerland, Nomura of Japan, even some sovereign wealth funds
that bought
subprime securities.
Deregulation
and a lack of business ethics are major causes of the subprime
meltdown; these
have been bipartisan. Republicans are more closely identified with
deregulation,
but it was Clinton who oversaw the breakdown of the wall between
investment and
commercial banking, for example. Several Clinton administration
officials went
to work or advocate for subprime lenders, defending their cashing-in as
in
support of the democratization (literally) of credit. While
Republican Phil Gramm went to work for
UBS as it got more and more into subprime, Democrat Robert Rubin went
to work
for subprime-heavy Citigroup and did nothing to reform its practices.
It is
notably that Citigroup has not yet showed up for bailout funds.
Citigroup's grown in
subprime had nothing
to do with the CRA. Rather, insurer Travelers Group, controlled by
Sandy Weill and Chuck Prince (and Robert Willumstad who would later
drive AIG into the ground), which already owned subprime lender
Commercial Credit, bought Citicorp and then subprime lender Associates.
They renamed the operation CitiFinancial, but never sought CRA credit
for Citibank for its operations. And when Inner City Press asked Chuck
Prince of Ciitgroup's securitization of loans by Ameriquest, Prince
said that had nothing to do with the CRA.
There is
more than enough blame to discredit both political parties. But it's
not the
Community Reinvestment Act statute that's to blame. If anything, the
CRA
provided a venue by which many of the problems were raised, and some
were even
solved. When Atlanta-based SunTrust, for example, applied to the
Federal
Reserve for approval of a merger in Memphis, Fair Finance Watch showed
the Fed
that SunTrust was lending to a slew of predatory lenders. SunTrust
ultimately
committed to get out of some of these fields, and had its application
approved.
That was CRA at work, in a way conveniently not mentioned in the sloppy
arguments being advanced.
Watch this site, and this Sept. 18 (UN) debate.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click
here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|