As
BB&T Tries Taking Over Suntrust
Disparate Lending and Branch
Closures To Be
Raised
By Matthew R.
Lee, FOIA
docs
SOUTH BRONX,
February 7 – When
BB&T
announced a
$66 billion
proposal to
take over
Suntrust
Bank, which
would close a still
undisclosed
number of
branches and
extend
BB&T
disparate
lending
patterns, many
linked it to
deregulatory
moves in
Washington.
These include
an assault on
the
Community
Reinvestment Act, being
led by
Comptroller of
the Currency
Joseph Otting,
who
while at OneWest Bank led
a false
commenting
process to
push through a
merger with
CIT Group. Fair
Finance Watch,
which has
been tracking
BB&T as
well as
Otting's and
the Federal
Reserve's
anti-CRA
moves, finds
that for
example in the
Atlanta
Metropolitan
Statistical
Area in 2017
BB&T
denied the
home purchase
mortgage
applications
of African
Americans 2.2
times more
frequently than
whites, while
making only 50
such loans to
African
Americans, and
23 to Latinos,
compared to
458 to whites,
all more
disparate that
other lenders
in the
market. While
some portray
the proposed
merger as a
fait accompli,
the Fed
and OCC must
hold public
comment
periods and
consider the
banks' CRA records,
even as they
race to
undermine the
law. Inner
City Press will submit
requests under
the Freedom of
Information
Act,
as it has
on OneWest - CIT
and now for
Otting's
schedule as
Comptroller.
On
January 16 Inner
City Press asked
the OCC on the
expedited basis
for records to
disclose
Otting's
meetings with
the banking
industry and
others: "Dear
OCC FOIA Officer: Inner City
Press / Fair Finance Watch (ICP)
makes this request for records
pursuant to the Freedom of
Information Act (“FOIA”), 5
U.S.C. § 552, and OCC
regulations. ICP requests copies
of records sufficient to show
all of Comptroller Otting's
scheduled meetings,
appointments, and scheduled
events from the date he became
Comptroller to the date of your
response including but not
limited to Outlook calendar
entries and daily briefing books
for Comptroller Otting on those
dates... ICP requests that you
expedite the processing of this
request. There is media interest
and there exist possible
questions concerning the OCC's
integrity, which affect public
confidence. See e.g. this
article and the CRA ANPR since."
We'll have more on this. Bigger
picture, or on the club BB&T
is trying to join, Otting's
OneWest colleague and now boss,
US Treasury Department Steve
Mnuchin on December 22 from Cabo
called six big US banks: "Brian
Moynihan, Bank of America;
Michael Corbat, Citi; David
Solomon, Goldman Sachs; Jamie
Dimon, JP Morgan Chase, James
Gorman, Morgan Stanley; Tim
Sloan, Wells Fargo. The CEOs
confirmed that they have ample
liquidity available for lending
to consumer, business markets,
and all other market
operations... Here are some of the documents,
for (still) free download on Patreon.
On October
1 Inner City Press / Fair
Finance Watch
submitted the documents
obtained under FOIA into the record
before the OCC, stating that
"These documents, which must
be considered as part of this
ANPR and any subsequent formal
rulemaking, show that
fraudulent comments supporting
Otting's OneWest were
submitted to the OCC -
presumptively attributable to
Otting.
The documents show that the
OCC sought an explanation from
Otting's / OneWest's outside
counsel - and the OCC's and
Justice Department's response
to date reflect that no such
explanation was ever provided.
The OCC nevertheless approved
the merger and even gave
weight to the fraudulent
comments. On this record we
again insist that Otting be
recused from this ANPR and any
related rulemaking or
proceedings. We have other
substantive concerns about
this ANPR but view the
question of Mr Otting's
recusal (and of with whom he
has met, on which Inner City
Press has another long-pending
FOIA request) as threshold
matter than must be addressed
as quickly as possible."
The FOIA
document as provided by the
OCC and US Department of
Justice reflect that the OCC
never followed up on its lone
(and wan) question to Otting's
counsel as Sullivan &
Cromwell to explain the
fraudulent comments. Nor did
this counsel respond to
questions from The Intercept's
David Dayen, who reports:
"AFTER A YEARLONG effort to
obtain the information, which
included ongoing litigation,
the OCC made available 15
pages. They contain emails to
and from David Finnegan, an
OCC senior licensing analyst
who was a point of contact for
public comment on the merger.
Four individuals contended in
emails to Finnegan that they
never sent the comment letters
supporting the merger. “This
is to bring to your attention
that I received an email from
the office of OCC regarding a
subject I am completely
unaware of,” wrote one
individual (the OCC redacted
the emailers’ identifying
information). “I DID NOT send
the email below that you
responded to. This is a
fraudulent use of my email
account.” The other three sent
similar complaints.
The letter of support
attributed to these
individuals was identical to
the letter posted at the
OneWest Bank website.
Matthew Lee of Inner City
Press expressed outrage at the
fake comments. “There’s
nothing more offensive of
speech rights than
artificially presenting
someone as saying something
you don’t believe,” Lee said.
“You have the right to be
silent. It’s so beyond the
pale.”
FOIA
Finds: OneWest CIT Ban... by on
Scribd
Finnegan
responded to these emailers, thanking them
for letting him know. He also sent two
emails to Stephen Salley, an attorney with
Sullivan & Cromwell, who was
representing OneWest in the merger. “FYI
and review. We would appreciate any
information you can provide regarding this
submission,” Finnegan wrote to Salley on
both occasions.
Presumably, Finnegan reached out to
OneWest’s lawyer about the fake comments
because they featured the same form letter
that OneWest had written to encourage
public support. But the two emails are the
only record that OCC did any investigation
of the fake comments. There is no reply
from Salley or Sullivan & Cromwell to
the OCC, at least not in written form. “By
reaching out to the attorneys immediately,
it suggests something serious, and yet
there’s no follow-up that’s apparent
whatsoever,” said Kevin Stein of the
California Reinvestment Coalition...Olivia
Weiss, a spokesperson for CIT, forwarded a
request for comment to her colleague Gina
Proia, who declined to comment. Salley did
not respond when asked whether he or his
law firm responded to the OCC....In his
public comment for Inner City Press, Lee
asked for Otting to recuse himself from
the new rule-making, highlighting the fake
comment controversy. “Public participation
is key to CRA, on performance evaluations
and crucially on bank merger and expansion
applications,” Lee wrote. He added that
it’s unclear whether the OCC has improved
its processes to prevent fake comments
from being submitted again in the CRA
rule-making.
We'll have
more on this - watch this site.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Mount Carmel Station, Box 580188,
Bronx NY 10458
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|