Amid
DC Ideas of Glass-Steagall,
Acquisitive Simmons Is Asked by
Fed of FFW's CRA Protest
By Matthew R. Lee
NEW YORK, March
14 – Amid proposals in
Washington even for a re-instituted
modified Glass Steagall Act
(Inner City Press is following
the proposals of Tom Hoenig,
even reported overseas),
acquisitive bankers and their
hangers-on around the United
States are getting sassy.
As an
example of acquisitive sass,
Arkansas-based Simmons
National's CEO George Makris
in a January conference call
was dismissive of the abuses
raised by Fair Finance Watch
to the Federal Reserve in
opposition to his bank's
application to acquire
Hardeman Investments. Simmons
has announced yet another
proposed acquisition, of
Southwest Bancorp in Texas.
Well, now
the Federal Reserve has asked
Makris' Simmons questions
including this on the Community
Reinvestment Act issues Fair
Finance Watch has raised:
"“This letter concerns the
application dated November 23,
2016, by Simmons First
National Corporation, Pine
Bluff, Arkansas, to merge with
Hardeman County Investment
Company, Inc., and thereby
indirectly acquire its
subsidiary, First South Bank,
both of Jackson, Tennessee,
pursuant to section 3 of the
Bank Holding Company Act of
1956, as amended. Upon review
of the information in the
record, staff of the Board of
Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (“Board”)
requests the following
additional information.
Supporting documentation
should be provided as
appropriate.
1. Describe in depth the
Community Reinvestment Act
(“CRA”) related initiatives of
Simmons Bank, Pine Bluff,
Arkansas, in both the Little
Rock, Arkansas, metropolitan
statistical area (“MSA”), and
the Memphis,
Tennessee-Mississippi-Arkansas,
MSA, since the bank’s 2013 CRA
performance evaluation,
performed by the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency.
Your response should describe
the specific CRA-related
initiatives that Simmons Bank
has undertook in these MSAs
since its 2013 evaluation, as
well as its CRA-related plans
in both MSAs after
consummation of the proposal.
Please address your responses
within eight business days...”
This
follows a February letter, here,
from the Federal Reserve to
Simmons, posing questions
about the issues FFW has
raised, such as these:
"This is a timely
first comment by Fair Finance
Watch opposing the Application
by Simmons First National
Corporation to acquire
Hardeman County Investment
Company Inc., and thereby
indirectly acquire First South
Bank.
Simmons
First has a presumptive
not-credible Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act reporting
record, which may in turn
violate Equal Credit
Opportunity Act rights. Now
that it reports some denials,
they are disparate.
In essence, the
HMDA data still reflect that
Simmons First “cooks the
books” to not issue or
acknowledge denials. For
conventional home purchase
loans in the Little Rock MSA
in 2015, Simmons First
reported 394 applications from
whites, with fully 329
originations and 12 denials, a
3% denial rate. For African
Americans, Simmons First's
denial rate was 19% -- more
than six times higher than for
whites.
In the Memphis MSA for
conventional home purchase
loans in 2015, Simmons First's
denial rate for African
Americans was 100%, while it
was only 4% for whites - an
incalculable disparity.
Simmons First “plans to reduce
Hardeman's annual noninterest
expenses by $5.3 million.”
How?
This acquisition
application should be denied."
Back on January
22, recently challenged BNC
Bancorp announced it wants to
be acquired by Pinnacle
Financial.
But BNC
has a weak record, as shown by
Fair Finance Watch, and has
made compliance commitments it
has withheld and, it seems,
has yet to implement.
As
reported by Inner City Press
in October, the 2015 Home
Mortgage Disclosure Act data
show that
BNC's
conventional
home purchase
lending to
African
Americans in
the Charleston
MSA has
falling by
over 80% from
2014 to 2015.
And
in the Charleston MSA in 2014
for conventional home purchase
loans, BNC made 173 such loans
to whites and only SIX to
African Americans, and none to
Latinos. For refinance loans, it
made 68 loans to whites and only
ONE to an African American,
while denying the applications
of African Americans 3.94 times
more frequently than those of
whites.
In 2015, things
got substantially
worse. For
conventional home
purchase loans in
the Charleston MSA
in 2015, while BNC
made 45 such loans
to whites, it made
only ONE to an
African American
(down from six in
2014).
So this will be
challenged.
In
the recent past the
Winston-Salem Journal reported:
"regulatory approval was delayed
in part by two New York advocate
groups challenging BNC's lending
practices involving minority and
underserved applicants in its
markets. Inner City Press and
affiliate Fair Finance Watch
filed a protest with the Federal
Reserve under the federal
Community Reinvestment Act. It
is a normal practice of those
groups to challenge
minority-lending practices when
a significant bank purchase is
announced. Fed officials asked
for additional information Dec.
2. BNC responded and asked that
its minority-lending data remain
confidential. Rick Callicutt,
the bank's chief executive and
president, said in April that
because BNC has surpassed $5
billion in total assets, it
faces "a higher level of
expectation to market more
heavily to the underserved in
its markets."
We'll
have more on this.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2015 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|