Ban
Slammed In
UN Appeal,
Heads to
Korea, Some
See Ng,
Eviction
Link
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, May 20
-- How
badly run is
the UN under
Ban Ki-moon?
Forget for a
moment his
acceptance of
Under
Secretaries
General like
Herve "Rape
and R&R"
Ladsous and
Cristina "The
Press
Evicter"
Gallach. Now
the UN Appeals
Tribunal has
ordered major
payouts,
and offered deep
critique.
The
appeals
tribunal has
said, "the
Secretary-General
is hereby
ordered to pay
M. Brown, C.
Coriette, A.
Gamit, L.
Giordano, M.
Kaufman, J.
Saffir and A.
Smith
compensation
for the
violation of
their rights equivalent
to three
years’ net
base salary,
calculated by
each
individual’s
salary in
effect at
the date of
this Judgment.
"The
Secretary-General
is further
ordered to pay
A. Aly, J.
Diaz, J.
Golfarini, A.
Hadera, E.
Hassanin, S.
Hto, S. Maung,
T. McCall, J.
Nemeth, R.
Pava and R.
Vocile
compensation for
the violation
of their
rights
equivalent to
three years’
net base
salary,
calculated by
each individual’s
salary in
effect at the
date of
separation."
The appeals
decision says,
"-para 35: of
the
"protracted
review
process"
resulting in
the
Admininstration's
"failure
to
follow its own
regulations,
rules and
issuances"
-para 37
:"massive
procedural
violations"
-para
38:
"Tolerating
such a
situation
was a form of
discrimination
and
humiliation"...
-para
39...which
"resulted in
inappropriate
inequalities
and in a
violation of
the principle
of equal pay
for equal
work"
-para 46: "the
Organization
has had the
benefit of the
Appellants'
performance at
a lesser
salary than
their
counterparts
working under
the same job
descriptions"
-para 50:
"violations of
staff members'
rights
as egregious
as in this
case".
And
what's Ban's
answer? While
few in the UN
press corps
even cover
this, evict
the Press that
does - and go
a long trip.
Soon
to be ex-UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon is
heading to his
native South
Korea, where
there is a Presidential
election in
2017. On May
19, only to
South Korean
correspondents,
Ban Ki-moon's
senior
adviser Kim
Won-soo said
and was quoted
that Ban's is
NOT a
political
trip. Thou
doth protest
too much.
While
reports of Mr
Kim's download
don't mention
that he is no
longer deputy
chief of staff
but instead
head of
Disarmament,
another senior
Ban
administration
official more
loyal (as they
should be) to
the UN than
Ban tells
Inner City
Press it seems
clear Ban is
considering a
run in South
Korea and that
what is is
doing and not
doing at and
through the UN
these days is
"all about
that."
Ban
wants to be
sure not to be
connected to
the major and
expanding UN
bribery
scandal that
as occurred on
his watch.
Indictments,
guilty pleas,
inconvenient
pictures of
Ban with
Francis
Lorenzo, John
Ashe and even
Ng Lap Seng.
A
number of
people in the
UN directly
connect Ban's
ouster and
eviction of
Inner City
Press, which
has asked
about nepotism
(see, the son
in law runnig
UNFPA Kenya,
and the nephew
who worked for
the company
managing
UNDP's
building, and
promising
more) to a
desire to
prevent or
discourage
coverage of
and inquiry
into Ban's
role in the Ng
Lap Seng
scandal.
(Ban
and his team
try to deflect
this by
saying, as Kim
Won-soo has,
that it is all
Cristina
Gallach, you
have to talk
to Cristina -
how?).
For
ten years as
Inner City
Press covered
the UN in ever
greater
detail,
showing
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
Herve Ladsous'
inept
overseeing and
cover up of sexual abuse and
exploitation
by peacekeepers,
disparate
treatment in
Mali,
dalliance with
genocide
in Sri Lanka
and
prospectively
Burundi, impunity
for cholera
deaths in
Haiti
and
until now for UN
lead poisoning
in Kosovo
and
cravenly
pro-Saudi position
on Yemen amid
the
airstrikes,
it was never
thrown out of
the UN.
Now it
has been, and
even as groups
like the
Government
Accountability
Project tell
Ban to reverse
the eviction
and give Inner
City Press
back its long
time office
and Resident
Correspondent
pass, Ban's UN
tellingly move
to award Inner
City Press'
office to
Egypt state
media
Al-Akhbar /
Akhbar
Elyoum.
Tweeted
photograph
here.
On May
19, a sign for
"Al Akhbar
Yom" went up
on Inner City
Press' office
- Inner City
Press has
STILL never
seen the
correspondent
being given
the stolen
office. The UN
says Resident
Correspondents
must be at the
UN three days
a week, but
Inner City
Press has
never seen
this person,
former UN
Correspondents
Association
president
Sanaa Youssef,
much less
asking a
question in
the UN noon
briefing.
Scribes
speaking off
the record
according to
the New York
Times of May
14 "accused
[ICP] of
printing
gossip,
rumors." That
UNCA's
president
rented an
apartment to
Palitha Kohona
then granted
his request to
screenin the
UN his
government's
war crimes
denial film is
no rumor or
gossip.
But
Akhbar Elyom,
to which
Gallach's and
Ban's MALU and
UNCA have
given Inner
City Press'
office, not
only gets
journalists in
Egypt attested
- it targets,
with a "Muslim
Brotherhood"
smear, a
journalist who
works right in
the UN. Arabic
article here.
This is
the journalism
that Ban
Ki-moon and
his Cristina
Gallach want
and reward. By
taking away
Inner City
Press' office,
it is now
required to
have a minder
and is told to
not ask
diplomats
questions.
This is
censorship.
Akhbar
Elyom has been
used to finger
for
imprisonment
non-state
journalists in
Egypt. For
example, in
July 2015
Aboubakr
Khallaf, the
founder and
head of the
independent
Electronic
Media
Syndicate
(EMS), “was
arrested after
a news article
was published
by the
government-owned
daily Akhbar
Elyoum.” (Article
in Arabic
here.)
According
to CPJ,
Khallaf's EMS
“trains and
supports
journalists
who work
online in
Egypt. The
syndicate
operates
independently
from the
state-recognized
Egyptian
Journalists
Syndicate...
The
local press
freedom group Journalists
Against
Torture and the
local Association
for Freedom of
Thought and
Expression (AFTE)
said Khallaf
was also
accused of 'taking
pictures and
displaying
artistic works
without a
license,'
among other
allegations. A
1998 executive
order states
that
individuals
conducting
audio and
audiovisual
work must have
a license from
the Ministry
of Culture.
According to
AFTE, the
accusation is
in connection
with Khallaf
photographing
the funeral of
Hisham
Barakat,
Egypt's
prosecutor
general who
was
assassinated
late last
month."
There
are many
echoes of this
in Ban's UN: as
simply one
example Ban's
Under
Secretary
General for
Public
Information
Cristina
Gallach
telling Inner
City Press it
takes
photographs of
things
that "are not
newsworthy."
There are
more, and more
examples of
Akbar Elyom.
Only
when it
questioned
Ban's and its
PR official
Cristina Gallach's
roles in
the John Ashe,
Ng Lap Seng
and Francis
Lorenzo UN
bribery
scandal did
Gallach order
Inner City
Press ousted
then evicted,
and now try to
give its
office to an
Egyptian media
which rarely
or never asked
questions. Ban
Ki-moon claimed
“That is not
my decision,”
but that is
not true.
The New York
Times on May
14 covered
the story. But
they did
not in their
long process
report, because it
happened at
the end, that
Ban Ki-moon
and Gallach are
moving to give
Inner City
Press' long
time office to
Egyptian state
media, Al
Akhbar /
Akhbar El-Yom
/ Akher Saa,
to a
correspondent
Sanaa Youssef
who most even
on the UN
press floor
have never
seen.
The
absurdity of
this has been
directly
raised to Ban
Ki-moon, his
Deputy and
Chief of Staff
with enough
time to stop
it. We'll see.
For now
from
the NYT we
note this
quote: “It’s
not exactly
the same
access,’’ Mr.
Dujarric said,
“but if he has
an issue,
there is a
staff of media
liaisons to
help him
resolve the
problem and
get where he
needs to go.”
This is false.
As Inner City
Press has
raised to Ban
Ki-moon, "even
when
begrudgingly
accompanied by
a staff member
of your
Spokesperson's
office, UN
Security
refused to
allow me
through the
turnstile onto
the second
floor of
Conference
Building. I
have been told
not to ask
questions of
diplomats,
just after you
came out of
ECOSOC and
even with a
MALU minder /
escort with
me, a UN
Security
official stood
directly in
front of me,
apparently so
I couldn't
even try to
ask you a
question. This
is
censorship."
We await
response.
Audio
hereBan,
when asked,
said “that is
not my
decision.” But
he heard about
the ouster and
eviction in
advance and
ok-ed it.
On
April 16, the
acting chief
of Gallach's
“Media
Accreditation
and Liaison
Unit Tal Mekel
oversaw the
eviction of
Inner City
Press' office,
leaving five
boxes of its
files out on
First Avenue.
Video
here.
Some in
Ban's team
indicated to
Inner City
Press its
office would
be left empty
until its four
month
“purgatory” or
punishment-for-reporting
period was
over.
That
was a lie: on
May 13, after
Inner City
Press asked
more questions
about Ban's
engagements
with John Ashe
and Francis
Lorenzo -
president of
South South
News which
paid UNCA and
still has a UN
office - Inner
City Press was
informed that
its long time
office is
being given
out.
When Inner
City Press
asked to see
the supposed
waiting list,
this was
refused by
Mekel. It is
apparently
entirely up to
Gallach - or
UNCA - who is
given UN
office space,
without which
one cannot
access the UN
Conference
Building's
second floor,
see below.
On
May 13 as the
UN Security
Council began
a meeting
about Lebanon,
the glass
doors to enter
the Council
were locked.
Apparenlty the
UN can't
afford one
guard for a
Security
Council
meeting, but
won't provide
information
requested by
the Press
about Ban
Ki-moon's
endless and
largely
fruitless
travel.
Inner City
Press, which
covers the UN
corruption
scandal and
was ousted
then evicted
by an official
implicated in
the scandal,
Cristina
Gallach -- see
OIOS
audit
Paragraphs 37
to 40 and
20(b) --
with Ban
Ki-moon's full
knowledge, was
unable to get
to the
Security
Council
stakeout. Its
pass, cut by
Gallach, won't
open the
turnstile at
the other end
of the
stakeout. This
week a guard
there even
refused to
allow Inner
City Press
through to a
stakeout with
a staffer of
the
Spokesperson's
office.
Gallach, at
least
according to
some paid to
tweet for the
UN, is in
Washington. So
Inner City
Press
undertook to
document the
restrictions
and
censorship.
Another UN
system
spokesperson
tried to
undermine it,
as did UN
Security. They
claimed
everything is
fine, even as
Security
Council
Ambassadors
asked them how
can it be that
the door is
locked (and
Press
excluded).
Some Security
write-up
began, sure to
omit all of
this. Watch
this site.