Ban
Ki-moon Bans
Press from
UNSC Stakeout
on Dropping
Saudi From
Yemen Kid
Killer List
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 2 --
When the UN
Security
Council held
an open debate
on Children
and Armed
Conflict on
August 2, a
main topic was
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon having
dropped the
Saudi-led
Coalition for
the annex to
the report,
despite
killing 1,200
children in
Yemen.
But
during the
debate, Ban
Ki-moon's
Secretariat
locked the
doors to the
Security
Council
stakeout,
effectively
Banning from
covering the
meeting the
vast majority
of journalists
accredit to
cover the UN.
Periscope
video here.
As speeches
were given by
Sudan,
Bangladesh,
Bahrain,
Brazil, Chile,
Turkey,
Jordan,
Myanmar, Viet
Nam, Qatar,
Azerbaijan and
Syria were
given, the
doors to the
Security
Council
stakeout
remained
locked. While
Ban Ki-moon
and his chief
of “Public
Information”
Cristina
Gallach have
shown a
penchant for
censorship of
critical
coverage, even
if one wanted
to look at
this exclusion
the most
benign light,
it was to save
the cost of a
single
Security
officer.
This
while Ban
Ki-moon, when
he left the
Council
refusing to
answer a Press
question, has
with in even
inside the UN
a number of
security
guards. Why?
How much will
be spend in
his upcoming
junket to Los
Angeles and
Calgary? How
much was spent
campaigning in
South Korea?
The UN
Secretariat of
Ban Ki-moon's
bungling of
Yemen
mediation has
become ever
more clear,
according to
multiple
sources and
documents
exclusively
seen by Inner
City Press,
see below.
Now Ban's
bungling and
worse have
become more
public. He put
Saudi Arabia
on the annex
to his
Children and
Armed Conflict
report, for
what it has
done in Yemen.
Then he
reversed
course - and
when slammed
by human
rights groups
and others,
had first his
officials,
then on June 9
did himself,
spin scribes
about how he
had been
blackmailed,
how he had
only sold out
in order to
help
Palestinians
who would be
left without
aid.
On August 2 as
Ban Ki-moon
entered the UN
Security
Council
meeting on
Children and
Armed
Conflict,
Inner City
Press asked
him about what
he had
received from
Saudi Arabia.
Ban did not
answer. Video
here.
Inside
the Security
Council, Ban
claimed that
his dropping
of the Saudi
Arabia-led
coalition from
the annex was
“very closely
considered” --
“After very
careful
consideration,
the Saudi
Arabia-led
coalition was
removed from
the annexes.”
What was so
“very
careful”?
When Ban
Ki-moon came
out of the
Council, Inner
City Press
nearly alone
at the
stakeout asked
him again, Has
Saudi Arabia's
coalition been
permanently
removed? Ban
only waved,
did not
answer. (He's
been known to
oust and
evict, at
least through
his Spokesman
and DPI chief
Cristina
Gallach.)
At the day's
noon briefing
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's
spokesman
Dujarric to
clarify, which
didn't happen
- he wouldn't
even answer
simple yes or
no questions.
But back at
the stakeout,
Inner City
Press asked
Leila
Zerrougui and
she answered
at length,
video here.
On Dujarric's
comment that
the US is not
in the Saudi
coalition, she
referred to a
“Note Verbale”
listing 10
countries.
That seems to
include Egypt,
whose state
media Akhbar
Al Yom's Sanaa
Youssef for
once was
around, as
usual asking
no questions.
That and
previous UNCA
presidency
seems the
basis to try
to use her to
take over
Inner City
Press long
time office,
despite Akhbar
Al Yom not
even complying
with the UN's
stated rules.
Saudi Arabia's
Ambassador
also did a
long stakeout,
denying that
Saudi Arabia
pressured Ban
Ki-moon. Inner
City Press
asked, What
about Jeffrey
Feltman, and
Saudi Foreign
Minister AL
Jubeir
repeatedly
calling him?
He
acknowledged
the calls.
Some
ask, So is it
that Feltman
pressured Ban
on behalf of
the US?
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2015 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|