On
Haiti, NYT
Lets Ban
Ki-moon Off
Hook, Cholera
Screening
Falsely
Claimed
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
October 13 --
After the
Haiti cholera
lawsuit
was filed
October 9 in
US federal
court in New
York City,
there's been
another
flurry of
editorial
calling for
"the UN" or
"the world
body" to take
responsibility.
While
welcome,
several
including
that of the
New York Times
miss the
point, or the
target.
The
NYT
editorial
reports
that "the
United
Nations’
response —
as it has been
the last three
years — was to
claim immunity
from
litigation."
But it nowhere
mentions the
name or even
title of
the individual
who is
responsible
for this
decision:
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon.
In
most things,
it is the
Permanent Five
members of the
Security
Council
who run the
UN. Notably,
any one of
them could
have blocked
Ban
Ki-moon from
becoming
Secretary
General.
But
when Inner
City Press
this week
asked French
Permanent
Representative
Gerard Araud
about the
lawsuit, he
said it was
entirely up to
Ban
Ki-moon.
And
then 19
members of the
US Congress
wrote to the
State
Department,
then US
Ambassador to
the UN Susan
Rice demanding
accountability
for
the cholera
brought to
Haiti, and
there was no
response,
Inner City
Press asked
the US Mission
to the UN
about it.
The US
response was,
it's
up to the
Secretariat of
Ban Ki-moon.
(The view of
Rice's
successor Samantha
Power on
this, if
different, is
not
yet known.
Inner City
Press got a response
from Power on
accountability,
but only with
regard to
Syria, here.)
Ban's
spokespeople,
when pressed,
tried to say
that the
decision to
deem
the legal
claims "not
receivable"
was made by
Ban's then
top lawyer
Patricia
O'Brien.
But she has
left the UN,
as least as an
employee: she
now represents
Ireland at the
UN in Geneva.
In any
event, this is
not the type
of issue that
saying "on
advice of
counsel" is
sufficient.
It
was and is Ban
Ki-moon's
decision, one
of the worst
in his tenure
so
far. (Notably
he also failed
to call even
for a
ceasefire as
40,000
civilians were
killed in Sri
Lanka in 2009,
then accepted
a
perpetrator as
a UN adviser
and tried to
withhold an
internal UN
report until
Inner City
Press obtained
and published
it last week,
here.)
So
why does the
"Paper of
Record" leave
the
decision-maker
out
of the
picture? Bloomberg
View,
which also
doesn't use
Ban's name, at
least notes
that "the
secretary-general’s
office replied
that
the complaint
was “not
receivable”
because it
would require
“a
review of
political and
policy
matters."
Of
course, it's
hard to an
"office"
responsible.
And this
Office of the
Spokesperson
for the
Secretary
General,
through
associate
spokesperson
Farhan Haq,
last week told
Inner City
Press
that as a
lesson learned
from Haiti, UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous
now screens
peacekeepers
for cholera.
Inner
City Press
knew this to
be false, and
said
it. When
it asked the
next
day -- no
correction was
offered in 24
hours -- Haq
acknowledge
that
no screening
is being done,
blaming WHO.
But
publications
like
Caribbean
Journal still
have online
uncorrected
stories like
this:
"UN: Lesson
Learned From
Haiti Is to
'Screen
Peacekeepers
For
Cholera.'"
That
story even
links
to the UN's
transcript of
its October 11
noon
briefing,
where Haq told
Inner City
Press, "part
of our lessons
learned from
this has been
to screen
peacekeepers
for cholera."
The
UN never added
a correction
to that -- no
screening is
taking place
-- nor
apparently has
it sought to
tell the
Caribbean
Journal and
others to stop
spreading the
"good" (but
false) news.
This UN will
only improve,
if then, if
those
responsible
are named and
asked to be
accountable.
The structure
of the UN
makes anonymity
and impunity
more likely than
elsewhere. To
counter this,
and open the
UN, the Free
UN Coalition
for Access
has begun, despite
UN threats.
Watch
this site.