|
In
Kabul Bombing Aftermath, Ban's Controlled Press Conference Dominated by
Goldstone, No Africa Issues
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, October 28, updated -- As in Kabul six UN staff and six others
were
killed, the Taliban saying because of participation in the
fraud-addled Afghan election, at the UN in New York, Secretary
General Ban Ki-moon delayed his scheduled press conference for half
an hour. Correspondents wondered at the fate of the relatively new
chief of UN Security, Gregory Starr, and at what threat level the UN
had put the area.
Level
Five
involves the evacuation of all but the most necessary UN staff.
Former Deputy UN envoy to Afghanistan Peter Galbraith, one wag
snarked, was already evacuated in his way, fired by Ban for going
public with the allegations of fraud and, Ban says, for calling for
the closure of remote "phantom" polling places.
The
assembled
correspondents, however, had other questions ready, including a
Washington Post piece out this morning about nepotism at the highest
-- and we mean highest -- levels of the UN.
UN's Ban at his last Afghan press availability
There is also Human
Rights Watch's call on Ban to name an independent international
investigation panel into war crimes in Sri Lanka. Watch this space.
Update of 11:10 a.m. -- Ban's opening, after
Afghanistan and Pakistan bombings, hits range of issues: not one in
Africa. Climate change, Iraq, Jerusalem and Gaza, Iran's nuclear site...
Update of 11:25 a.m. -- still no Africa questions. Climate change,
Goldstone report, Afghanistan including Karzai's brother (Ban says he
read the report this morning, or a few days ago), Ban is sending ASG
Taranco to Iraq. But Darfur? Congo? Let's see.
Update of 11:37 a.m. -- first (and only?) African question, about Nowak
barred from Zimbabwe. Ban says, I'll get back? to you. "Another Africa
question?" Ms. Montas moves on.
Update of 11:50 a.m. -- At 11:40, Ban announced he has to leave before
11:45, "this will have to be the last one." Another question on Gaza,
and that's it. Not a single answer about Africa, where well over half
of the Secretariat's work is. In Seattle, Ban when pressed about
genocide said Darfur was his number one priority. Then why no mention
in 40 minutes?
On his way out, Ban shakes hands with a half dozen
correspondents. To Inner City Press he says, You didn't get called on
to ask any questions. You don't say.
As for example on Sri Lanka, on the brewing nepotism
issues, on which Ban's spokespeople try to avoid and then refuse to
answer or made dead-end referrals about, "they can run but they can't
hide" -- watch this site.
On
Sri Lanka, UN's Alston Probes Execution Video, Kaelin Says His Praise
Was Misquoted
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, October 27 -- As Sri Lanka announces another internal
investigation of the war crimes charges against it, at the UN on
Tuesday the Special Rapporteur on executions Philip Alston told the
Press he has "begun to commission some analyses of that video
tape" depicting Sri Lankan soldiers shooting bound and naked
prisoners. Video here,
from Minute 6:56.
Inner
City Press
asked Alston about the reports that people seeking to surrender in
May, waving white flags after in some cases speaking with UN
officials, were shot and killed, reportedly on orders from the
highest ranks of the Sri Lanka military. Video here,
from Minute
11:13.
"Let's
have an independent inquiry," Alston said,
noting that past "investigations" by the government were
not independent. He used as his example that two Sri Lankan military
figures were charged with investigating the execution video. The
government of Sri Lanka cannot be proud of its track record, Alston
said.
Before
commissioning his own analysis of the video, Alston said he "would
have liked the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights"
Navi Pillay to have undertaken an investigation, as was done for
example by Justice Richard Goldstone of the conflict in Gaza this
year.
Inner
City Press
asked Alston about the countries on the Human Rights Council which
have rebuffed his requests to visit, including both China and Russia,
which blocked Security Council consideration of the conflict in Sri
Lanka this Spring. Alston said "there has to be a limit,"
presumably to what members of the Human Rights Council can do. But
for now, there are no limits. Alston's mandate expires in August 2010
and will no be renewed.
UN Rapporteur Alston at UN before, OHCHR
investigation of Sri Lanka not shown
Two
other
Rapporteurs, on Internally Displaced People and freedom of religion,
also took questions about Sri Lanka on Tuesday. Inner City Press
asked IDP expert Walter Kaelin about a headline in
Sri Lanka, "UN
envoy pleased with progress," in the Sunday Observer of
September 27.
Kaelin
said he'd
never spoken with that newspaper, and went on to criticize the
conditions in the Manik Farms camps. He said people were being moved
out. Inner City Press asked if the so called transit camps also
restrict movement. He said that they did, and that this did not
comply with international humanitarian law. Video here.
But the UN keeps funding
it, apparently.
Inner
City Press
asked about IDPs' right to return to their homes, and not be
displaced, as some say is planned in northern Sri Lanka east of A9,
by members of other ethnic grounds. While Kaelin said there is a
right to return which the government of Sri Lanka has not disputed,
he acknowledged that he is not able to closely monitor what happens
on the ground. And therein lies the problem.
Inner
City Press
asked the Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief Asma Jahangir
about this same issue, Sinhalese versus Tamils, the Buddhist
triumphalism some see in Sri Lanka. She acknowledged she'd heard of
it, ascribing it to political fights "long ago." Video here.
But these
fights continue. The UN system, even its special rapporteurs, may
appear out of touch. Watch this site.
* * *
On
Sri Lanka, UN Inaction on Torture, Refugees, Peacekeepers' War Crimes
and Sexual Abuse
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, October 24 -- While the UN claims to be much concerned about
civilians in and from Sri Lanka, a week of questioning five separate
officials at UN headquarters tells a different story. When Inner City
Press asked the UN's special rapporteur on torture Manfred Nowak if
he'd looked into the case of the two UN system staff members
disappeared and they say tortured by the Sri Lankan government, he
said no. Video here.
Inner
City Press
has asked two of the spokespeople for Secretary General Ban Ki-moon
what is the UN system doing about the Sri Lankan asylum seekers on
hunger strike in Indonesia, blocked from Australia, and now off
Canada. Each time an answer has been promised, but none has been
provided.
With
UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay on a panel about human
trafficking, Inner City Press asked what the UN made of claims that
these Tamil asylum seekers were somehow engaged in traffic. Ms.
Pillay did not answer, leaving another panelist to answer, in
essence, not necessarily. Video here.
Meanwhile,
despite
most recently the US State
Department report detailing what elsewhere
are called war crimes, the UN
Department of Peacekeeping Operations
is contracting for 198 more Sri Lankan soldiers to patrol in Haiti.
Inner City Press asked what safeguards are in place to determine if
any of the supposed peacekeepers were themselves engaged in crimes of
war. UN associate spokesman Farhan Haq replied, "DPKO
relies upon
the troop-contributing countries to vet all of their soldiers to make
sure that their records are clean regarding any sort of involvement
in violations." This
position was repeated by a representative of UN Police. Video here.
Sri Lankan troops in Haiti, war crimes not shown
At
a Friday press
conference promoting a concert for Peacekeeping, sponsored by Chinese
businessmen who contracted for photographs with Ban Ki-moon, a pro-UN
director spoke glowingly of the Sri Lankan troops in Haiti. Inner
City Press noted that a full contingent was sent home amid charges of
sexual abuse and exploitation. They talked about that, the director
answered, they said there were some bad apples. Video here.
Meanwhile in
Toronto, Tamils have protested in front of UNICEF. Is it any wonder?
From
the October 23 trancript:
Inner
City Press: I’ve seen that Sri Lanka is sending a contingent of
198 peacekeepers to Haiti on 8 November, and I’m wondering, in
light of the Office of the Human Rights finding, this United States
State Department finding, looking into war crimes, and a European
Union thing on [inaudible], there’s a lot of findings -- what is
DPKO [the Department of Peacekeeping Operations] going to do in terms
of making sure that the soldiers sent didn’t participate in what
now a number of people say credibly may be war crimes? What
safeguards are in place?
Associate
Spokesperson Haq: As you know, as a standard rule, DPKO relies upon
the troop-contributing countries to vet all of their soldiers to make
sure that their records are clean regarding any sort of involvement
in violations.
* * *
Is
Sri Lanka Postponing Visit of UN's Caemmart Retaliation?
UN Claims Photo-Op Was Disclosure
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, October 20 -- The Sri Lankan government is already delaying
the visit of the UN's Patrick Cammaert, announced a mere week ago as
starting in early November. In response to questions from Inner City
Press last week, UN Children and Armed Conflict expert Radhika
Coomaraswamy disclosed for the first time that the government had
agreed to an early November visit by Mr. Cammaert, formerly with the
UN Peacekeeping Mission in the Congo.
Yesterday,
Inner
City Press reported
that sources told it the visit would be delayed.
Tuesday it was authoritatively and multiply confirmed to Inner City
Press, that
the government has pushed the date back to November 23 -- a time
which currently doesn't work for Mr. Cammaert.
The
government's
pretext for the delay is that it is moving some of the youths from
one camp to another. These moves are of course within the control of
the government, and it is not at all clear that the government didn't
know about its move last week.
Childen in Sri Lankan IDP camp in May,
November visit on children and armed conflict not yet shown
To
some, the postponement seems a heavy handed reaction to Ms.
Coomaraswamy having said anything publicly about Cammaert's trip.
Then again, Inner City Press' sources for yesterday's item now say
that the government is dangling the possibility of reinstating
Cammaert. It is called trying to control the UN's speech: quite
successfully, of late.
Footnote:
following yesterday's
piece which questioned why Ban Ki-moon's
Spokesperson did not last week in lengthy noon briefing read-outs
mention anything about Ban's meeting with the Sri Lankan minister,
the Spokesperson points to the listing of a photo-op between the two.
Inner City Press, which had seen that before publishing yesterday's
not inconsistent piece, has asked for a copy of Ban's Daily Schedule
for October 12,
for
an on the record answer as to why the Spokesperson's Office does not
archive Ban's daily schedule and an explanation of how it is decided
which of the S-G's meetings and calls are presented in the initial
parts of noon briefings or in writing, and which are only summarized
if someone knows to ask. Watch
this site.
* * *
At
UN, Delayed Read-out of Ban's Meeting with Sri Lankan Minister,
NGO Deadline for Internment, Cammaert Postponed?
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, October 19 -- UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon met last
week with Sri Lanka's Minister of Disaster
Management and Human Rights Mahinda Samarasinghe. Inner City Press
learned of the meeting on October 16, and on October 19 asked Ban's
spokesperson Michele Montas to confirm and summarize the meeting, and
why it had seemingly not been on Ban's public schedule. Video here,
from Minute
19:56.
Ms.
Montas replied
that her Office had been holding a "read out" of the
meeting for "whoever wanted to find out about it." Among UN
correspondents, Inner City Press would be defined as interested in
this issue, as "wanting to find out about it," and yet was
never told of the meeting. Nor were wire service reporters who like
Inner City Press accompanied Ban on his trip to Sri Lanka in May. So
who were these interested
people who were told about the meeting?
The UN
offers, unprompted, press releases and read-outs at its daily news
briefing. But during the October 13 briefing no mention was made of Sri
Lanka, see transcript here.
Why was no read-out given of the meeting with a minister of Sri Lanka,
where Ban is uncomfortably implicated?
Later
in the
October 19 briefing, a staffer brought in to Ms. Montas a piece of
paper and she read
out loud that the October 12 meeting was a continuation of discussions
held
during the General Debate and by Ban's Political Affairs chief Lynn
Pascoe, about political, humanitarian and human rights commitments,
particularly resettlement and freedom of movement. Video here,
from
Minute 25:40; see transcript
here and below.
On
resettlement and
freedom of movement, Inner City Press has separately been told that non
governmental
organizations working in Sri Lanka are setting a December 31
deadline, that they cannot in good conscience continue propping up
internment camps after that date, but only "open" camps, a
definition of which they say does not include camps like the transit
camps near Jaffna from which IDPs are given day passes but must
return at night.
Given
what many view as the UN's
laxity and lack of transparency to date, perhaps only the NGOs are
willing to actually push for an end to the internment. We'll see.
UN's Ban on Sri Lankan government banner in internment camp in May
After the belated October 19 read-out, Inner City Press
said it had not seen the meeting on Ban's schedule. It was on the
12th, Ms. Montas said. It was there. Video here,
from Minute 26:16.
Neither
Inner City
Press nor the other reporters it later consulted ever saw the meeting
listed on Ban's daily
schedule. This document, which the UN doesn't publicly archive, lists
Ban's
meetings with ministers and even NGOs. While Ms. Montas said it was
on the schedule on October 12, none of the reporters consulted by
Inner City Press has seen it. Perhaps it was put in some late revision
of the schedule, which was then never seen again? Could this be part of
an emerging
pattern?
Ironically,
the
UN's Department of Political Affairs has since bragged that Ban was
"tough" in the meeting, telling Samarasinghe that Sri Lanka
has so tarnished its reputation that even he is finding it hard to
defend them anymore. But if Ban is supposedly talking tough, why keep
the meeting secret?
Inner
City Press
asked Ban's Spokesperson's Office, again on October 19, if there is yet
any UN
response to the Sri Lankan asylum seekers diverted from Australia to
the coast of Indonesia, and now other arriving on the shores of
Canada. Again there was no answer. Video here,
from Minute 20:26. The questions will continue.
Footnote:
Inner City Press is also told that the visit
to Sri Lanka for the UN
of Patrick Cammaert, which UN children and armed conflict expert
Radhika Coomaraswamy disclosed in response to Inner City Press'
questions last week, now faces postponement by Sri Lanka's
government. Watch this site.
From
the UN's
transcript of the October 19, 2009 noon briefing:
Inner
City Press: I also want to ask about Sri Lanka. Just two
interrelated questions. I had asked last week about these… there
is a list now of two instances of refugees or asylum seekers. One
was trying to get to Australia; they have been on a hunger strike off
Indonesia saying that they want UNHCR to come. The other one is off
Canada. Is the UN aware of this? What’s the UN… given Ban
Ki-moon’s…
Spokesperson
Montas: I’m sure the UNHCR is aware of them. I don’t have
anything specific. I can get more information for you on what is
happening to them. But of course, we’re aware.
Inner
City Press: And I wanted to know whether the Secretary-General met
last week with the Minister of Crisis and Human Rights of Sri Lanka. I
was told that he was in the United States and…
Spokesperson:
Yes, he did, and we had a readout for whoever wanted to find out
about it.
Inner
City Press: Was it on the schedule? I mean, I definitely wanted to…
Spokesperson:
Yes, it was on his schedule.
Inner
City Press: What day did they meet and what was the meeting about?
Spokesperson:
This was last week. I don’t have the details right now. But of
course I can give you the details. We had a readout on it.
Later
in the
briefing:
Spokesperson:
...about what you were asking [earlier], on the Secretary-General’s
meeting with the Sri Lankan Minister of Disaster Management and Human
Rights, what we had last week was: This is a continuation of
discussions the Secretary-General held on the margins of the general
debate and those pursued by Mr. [B. Lynn] Pascoe during his visit to
Sri Lanka -- on the need to accelerate the Government’s efforts in
addressing post-conflict political, humanitarian and human rights
challenges, in particular the urgent issue of resettlement of IDPs
and freedom of movement of IDPs. So that’s what it was about. That
readout was available to you last week.
Inner
City Press: [Inaudible]… I look at the daily schedule everyday
and I didn’t see that meeting…
Spokesperson:
Because it was on the twelth [sic]. It was there.
* * *
With
UN Sending Cammaert to Sri Lanka on IDPs, Kohona Combats Salt and Probes
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, October 14 -- The UN will send Canadian Major General Patrick
Cammaert to Sri
Lanka from November 8 to 13, and "internally
displaced children will be one of the issues raised," UN
children and armed conflict official Radhika Coomaraswamy told the
Press on Wednesday.
Inner City Press had asked Ms. Coomaraswamy
about her reported meeting with Sri Lanka's Prime Minister during the
UN General Debate in late September. Video here,
from Minute 42:26.
Ms.
Coomaraswamy
replied that she "met the Prime Minister more socially,"
but had officially met with the Foreign Minister and Secretary
Minister of Defense (apparently referring to presidential brother
Gotabhaya Rajapaksa). She said that the rights of IDP children were
one of the issue raised.
Inner
City Press
asked if she thought that the condition of IDP children in the Menik
Farm camps in Vanni and elsewhere complied with the "Rights and
guarantees for internally displaced children" which is Annex I
to her Office's report to the UN General Assembly.
Ms.
Coomaraswamy
replied that on "freedom of movement" and other issues, she
believes the camps are "in violation of principles." She
called Sri Lanka's response "draconic" or draconian.
Inner
City Press has previously
interviewed Cammaert, who used to serve a UN military
commander in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. He told Inner City
Press it was an outrage that the UN stands by while indicted war
criminal Jean Bosco Ntaganda walks freely around Goma in North Kivu,
and has a role with the Congolese Army which the UN assists. What
outrages while Cammaert witness, and have the courage to speak about,
in Sri Lanka and after he comes back?
Cammaert: the UN sends a peacekeeper to Sri
Lanka, 5 months after blood bath on the beach
Meanwhile,
Sri
Lanka's Ambassador to the UN Palitha Kohona was to be found down in
the basement of the UN, where Sri Lanka was sponsoring a lunch time
session on desalinization. Kohona appeared recently on BBC's Hard
Talk program, and said that no investigation of war crimes in Sri
Lanka is needed, because people just want to move forward.
Which,
some noted, is among the defenses being offered in the Security
Council today, and in Geneva tomorrow, by Israel, for its acts in
Gaza earlier this year. Click here
for that story.
Footnote:
more seriously, there is a boat en route to Australia, now in
Indonesian waters, full of asylum seekers from Sri Lanka. The way the
ship and refugees are being treated does not seem to comply with
international law. And where is the UN High Commissioner for
Refugees?
* * *
At
UN, Questions of Rain and Sri Lanka's Camps, of Elections and
Interruptions
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, October 6 -- As deadly rains
and storms sweep through Asia, Inner
City Press on Tuesday asked top UN humanitarian John Holmes what is
being done about the UN funded internment camps in Northern Sri
Lanka. Video here,
from Minute 22:29.
Holmes
replied,
"especially about Manik Farm," that beyond digging drainage
ditches, the plea is to "get people out," whether to their
homes or to host families or even to "transit camps... as long
as they are open." Video here,
from Minute 24:36.
The
last part of
Holmes answer referred to the trend of even those who are moved out
of Manik Farms simply being taken to other camps, further out of the
spotlight. While the government brags that in some cases, people are
given "day passes" to go out of these transit camps, this
would tend to show that even the government acknowledges that such
people have been "screened" and are not a threat.
Why
not just
release them, then? Some allege that the continued detentions, and
also the move-arounds, are not unrelated to the elections. There's
been a lot of talk about irregularities in Afghanistan, but not yet
on Sri Lanka. Watch this site.
In Manik Farm camp in May awaiting the UN, monsoons loom
Footnote:
When Holmes comes to speak to the UN press corps, he has jokingly
said he knows the Press will ask him about Sri Lanka. But on Tuesday
when Inner City Press began to ask about the Manik Farm camps --
after other series of questions were allowed about Yemen and Pakistan
-- the moderator tried to cut Inner City Press off. Video
here,
from
Minute 22:27.
Given the earlier
conduct of the press conference, there was no basis, and so Inner
City Press simply continued with the question. Only in (this)
UN....
* * *
At
UN, Ban Cannot Stop Sri Lanka's Shooting, Blake's Visit, Report
Mid-October
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, September 29 -- In the wake of the Sri
Lankan Army shooting
at least two children on the margins of the Manik Farm "Internally
Displaced Persons" camp in Vavuniya, Inner City Press on Tuesday
asked UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon if, in his September 28
meeting with three Sri Lankan ministers, he sought or gained any
commitment for non-use of lethal weapons on unarmed IDPs. Video here,
from Minute 32:40.
Mr.
Ban proffered
a more
than 150 word answer, but did not mention any such commitment,
even seeking one. He rattled off "three points" -- in
essence, resettlement, reconciliation and accountability -- and said
"they committed that they will do as we have agreed. But we
have to have a close watch and monitor this process."
But will
they keep shooting unarmed civilians, including children?
Speaking
of war
crimes, Inner City Press has continued to inquire into the reason for
the delay in the U.S. Department of State's report on war crimes in
Sri Lanka, which was due in Congress on September 21. On September
29, a U.S. official on background told Inner City Press, "We are
still working on the report. Congress has extended the submission
date. We expect to submit the report to Congress in mid-October."
This
would tend to
rebut reports
Tuesday in the Sri Lankan press that the report is
delayed "indefinitely," with assistance to the Rajapaksa
administration from Israel, citing "the real assets of the Sri
Lankan Air Force driving Eelam War 1V were the new Spy planes.
Several Cessna 421 , Golden Eagle and two ‘Beechcraft’ super
King crafts were bought from the United States for maritime and
ground surveillance . Close ground surveillance was carried out by
Israeli IAI searcher MK 11 and EMIT Blue Horizon 2 unmanned aerial
vehicles."
While the
arming may be true, the full disarming of
the report does not appear to be.
UN's Ban and children in IDP camps in May,
SLA shooting not shown
Just
after Mr.
Ban's press conference, Inner City Press observed what seemed to be
U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian
Affairs Robert Blake entering the elevators on the UN's second floor.
Later in the day, Mr. Blake graciously confirmed to Inner City Press
that he was at UN headquarters, holding meetings on the margins of
the General Assembly and Tuesday meeting with UN colleagues on the
countries in his area of responsibility -- which includes Sri Lanka.
We hope to have more on this.
From
the UN's
September 28, 2009 transcript:
Inner
City Press: [On the] children shot in Sri Lanka, did you get a
commitment from the Government not to shoot unarmed civilians who
leave the camp?
S-G
Ban: Now, on Sri Lanka, yesterday we had an extensive discussion with
the Prime Minister. And the Foreign Minister and Defense Secretary
were also present in the meeting. They were the key people in
managing this situation. I made three points clearly again, which I
did during my visit, and which was repeated and urged again during
Mr. [B. Lynn] Pascoe's visit earlier this month. First, that all
IDPs should be resettled, as they had promised, by the end of
January. There should be extra measures taken, particularly during
this monsoon season, because their suffering will be much, much more
serious during this wet season. They should immediately begin to
reach out to minority ethnic groups, including Tamils. Then, I
emphasized the importance of instituting immediately this judiciary
accountability process for violations of international humanitarian
law and international human rights law. Those were three points, and
they committed that they will do as we have agreed. But we have to
have a close watch and monitor this process.
So
was there any
"commitment from the Government not to shoot unarmed civilians
who leave the camp?" Apparently not.
* * *
As
Sri Lankan IDPs Shot, UN's Pascoe Says Camps To Be "Thinned
Out," Council Should Meet
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, September 28 -- Just after the Sri Lankan Army shot people
leaving the Manik Farms camps in Vavuniya, Sri Lanka's Prime
Minister, Foreign Minister and Secretary of Defense met in New York
with the UN's highest officials.
Afterwards,
Inner City Press asked
the head of the UN's Department of Political Affairs Lynn Pascoe
about the shooting incidents, whether the Sri Lankan
Army's web site
had misquoted him, and why the UN had not convened a meeting about
Sri Lankan during the last week's General Debate. Video here,
from
Minute 55:49.
Of
the shooting,
Pascoe attributed it to overcrowding in the Manik Farms camps, saying
"they need to be thinning it out." He acknowledged that the
Sri Lankan Army had put a "different spin" on what he said
during his visit this month. Inner City Press asked about the headline
"You have better story than is getting out today -
Pascoe to President." Inner City Press asked this question ten
days ago, without getting any answer.
Pascoe
said he
was only been referring to de-mining, that he was "surprised"
he was quoted "for saying things quite in the way that [he] had
said them." But why didn't the UN seek a correction then, as it
has when for example Sudan characterized what the UN told them in a
bilateral conversation?
Pascoe
said that
the meeting with Defense Secretary (and Presidential brother)
Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, Prime Minister Ratnasiri Wickramanayaka and
Foreign Minister Rohitha Bogollagama was attended not only by Ban
Ki-moon, but also by John Holmes and Vijay Nambiar.
As
Pascoe sought
to turn to another questioner, Inner City Press reminded him of the
unanswered question of why the UN had not set up a meeting during the
General Debate, as it did on Myanmar, Somalia and other countries.
UN's Pascoe on Sept. 28, Sri Lanka's "different
spin" not shown
Pascoe said there had been some thought "early on" of
convening such a meeting about Sri Lanka, but it didn't happen. He
added that "it is important for the Security Council to
discuss... in their rooms or in the basement." Well, the UN
Charter provides for the Secretary General to convene a Security
Council meeting, under Article 99. Watch this site.
Footnotes:
in continued reporting
on the delayed U.S. State Department report on
war crimes in Sri Lanka, which was due before Congress on September
21 but was then deferred, Inner City Press has been told that staff
for Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont found deficiencies with the
report, having nothing to do with the stealth visit of Gotabhaya
Rajapaksa. Meanwhile, in Europe the possible termination of Sri
Lanka's GSP Plus tariff benefit is set to be discussed on October 1,
and voted on by October 15. We'll see.
Inner
City Press' June 18 debate on Sri Lanka, click here
Click here
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|
, 
