UN Sends Nambiar
to Sri Lanka, Quiet Diplomacy and Ships Off the Beach?
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: Exclusive
UNITED
NATIONS,
April 16, published 11 am, updated 12:20 -- With even the UN now
speaking of a “bloodbath on the
beach” in Northern Sri Lanka, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has
quietly sent his titular chief of staff Vijay Nambiar, a former
Indian diplomat, to the region to try what the UN is calling “quiet
diplomacy.” Inner City Press is told by well placed sources in and
outside of the UN that at first the Sri Lankan government said no, as
they have to proposed UK envoy Des Browne. Then they relented, and
Nambiar set out.
At Thursday's UN noon briefing, when Inner City Press asked UN
Associate Spokesman Farhan Haq to formally confirm that Mr. Nambiar is
the envoy and is in Sri Lanka, Haq confirmed both, video here.
Some
in Ban's
inner circle wonder if it is wise to send an Indian for the job,
given India's large Tamil population and response to the
assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. But perhaps that, along with Nambiar's
ties with the Chinese, is what has made Sri Lanka feel comfortable.
Separately,
an
idea is percolating to send or even rent boats to park just off the
beach, so that if the Sri Lankan government undertakes the final
offensive many are predicting, even in the UN, at least there are
ships for some civilians. That such ideas are circulating in the UN,
while Ban's chief of staff heads to Colombo, to many indicate that
things are coming to a head.
UN's Nambiar, at right, and UN's Ban sitting,
bloodbath on the beach not shown
In the 27
months of the Ban Ki-moon administration, even many of Nambiar's
former colleagues in the diplomatic corps have expressed sympathy for
him. On paper, he is Ban's chief of staff or chef de cabinet, a
powerful position held, under Kofi Annan, by the UK's Mark Malloch
Brown. But Ban's real chief of staff is Nambiar's deputy Kim Won-soo.
The power lines are constantly evident, for example at a ceremony
this year when senior UN official signed their Compacts with Ban and
then a dozen got in line to speak to Kim while Nambiar stood to the
side.
Could a mission
by Nambiar to Sri Lanka rehabilitate his stature in the UN, show what
he and not Kim is capable of? As Inner City Press noted with regard
to the United States -- click here
for video -- the death toll in Sri Lanka may be Barack
Obama's and his advisors' “problem from hell.” That's the title
of a book by Obama adviser -- and recent Hilary Clinton adversary --
Samantha Power, now on Obama's National Security Council. Her
commitment to the principles in the book, given her continued
silence, are being called into question by some. The UN, of course,
is supposed to stand for and with civilians in harm's way, and with
more than quiet diplomacy.
Sri Lanka
loudly rejected the envoy named by the UK, Des Browne. In a
government statement from Colombo on which Inner City Press yesterday
sought comment from the UK Mission to the UN, the rejection of Des
Browne is reiterated. Is Nambiar viewed differently? His supporters
point out that he has “connections with the Chinese,” which might
be helpful.
Nambiar was
India's ambassador to China, and speaks fluent Chinese. China has
resisted even discussing the deaths in Sri Lanka in the UN Security
Council chamber, on the theory that is it a purely internal matter.
UK diplomats publicly takes a different view, but some question their
commitment to stopping the carnage in Sri Lanka. Zimbabwe, like Sri
Lanka, played an anti-colonial card when the UK raised its voice. But
in that case the UK pushed forward with a draft sanctions resolution.
Here, the UK resists even criticizing Sri Lanka's detention of UN
staff, offering justifications such as that perhaps the UN staff are
able to continue to carry out their UN work while in detention in the
camps. We continue to wait for the UK's formal answer to these
questions, which Inner
City
Press asked the UK Mission to
the UN two questions on Sri Lanka early on April 15:
Does the UK
believe that international law and the
rights of UN humanitarian staff are being violated by the
now-acknowledged
detention of UN staff in the Sri Lankan government's “IDP” camps?
It has been reported
this morning that Sri Lanka's “minister also told the
British
Foreign Secretary that there was concern that the LTTE would
continue to
consolidate its fortification of the No-Fire Zone.” Please confirm the
accuracy
of that, and of this
and if so, does the UK interpret it as saying that
an offensive on the No-Fire Zone and the civilians in it will begin?
What did
the UK Foreign Secretary say?
As
of
this press time more than 24 hours later, the formal answer has been
referral to Minister
Miliband's April 12
statement. As more answers arrive we will report them on this site.
Click here
for a new YouTube video, mostly UN Headquarters footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|