In
Sudan As Journalists Arrested
In Omdurman Inner City Press
Asked UN Guterres Dec 20 Still
No Answer
By Matthew
Russell Lee, CJR Letter
PFT Q&A
UNITED NATIONS
GATE, December 28 –
Despite Sudan's Omar al Bashir
being indicted for genocide,
Antonio Guterres has met with
him, as acknowledged to Inner
City Press by Guterres' deputy
spokesman Farhan Haq on 29
January 2018 (before Guterres
had Inner City Press roughed
up and banned
from the UN for 177 days
now) - and, we are now told by
UNHCR sources, in 2012, see
below. On 20 December 2018,
banned Inner City Press asked
Guterres and his spokesman
Stephane Dujarric and Farhan
Haq, "December 20-2: On Sudan,
what is the SG's comment and
action on the anti-government
protests that started on
Wednesday in northern Sudan
and have been spreading to
other cities?" Even now with
more journalists arrested in
Sudan, for example Ahmed
Younes from Al-Sharq Alowsat
newspaper and Maha Al-Tilib
from Attayar newspaper, both
just for reporting on the
protests in Wad Nubawi,
Omdurman, there has been no
answer at all for eight days,
nor to 46 other questions
Inner City Press has submitted
including on conflicts
of interest by Guterres.
It turns out the UN has become
so corrupt under Guterres that
one of lead Spokesman Stephane
Dujarric's Associate
Spokespeople Ms
Keishamaza
Rukikaire who
actually seems to care or at
least re-tweet about Sudan has
been ordered not to answer
banned Inner City Press'
written questions about Sudan,
etc, see here.
The concern is outsourced to
Geneva, "independent" experts
from also crack-down Togo, and
Benin: "UN experts today
expressed alarm at Sudan’s
escalating violence and
reports of protesters killed
during recent large-scale
demonstrations against rising
prices and food and fuel
shortages.
“The right to freedom of
peaceful assembly is an
inherent element of
democracies,” said the UN
Special Rapporteur on the
rights to freedom of peaceful
assembly and of association,
Clement Nyaletsossi Voule.
He said he was deeply
concerned at reports of
government security forces
using live ammunition during
protests which have swept the
country since 19 December.
“The Government should respond
to legitimate grievances of
the Sudanese people,” the
Special Rapporteur said.
The UN Independent Expert on
the situation of human rights
in the Sudan, Aristide
Nononsi, said the use of
lethal force was unacceptable
when controlling
demonstrations.
“Dissent must be tolerated and
not restrained with excessive
force which can lead to loss
of life. I strongly urge the
Sudanese security forces to
exercise the utmost restraint
to avoid the escalation of
violence and take immediate
measures to protect the right
to life of the demonstrators,”
Nononsi said.
The experts said they were
also concerned at reports of
arbitrary arrests and
detentions of unknown numbers
of protesters, including
students and political
activists. “We call on
the Sudanese authorities to
release those detainees. We
also urge the authorities to
carry out independent and
thorough investigations and to
ensure that security forces
handle protests in line with
the country’s international
human rights obligations.”
The UN rights experts said the
Government of the Sudan in May
2016 had pledged to foster an
environment that supports
inclusive dialogue,
instituting legal reforms to
promote respect for human
rights and fundamental
freedoms. “The events of
recent days do not demonstrate
this commitment,” they said.
The UN experts said they are
ready to cooperate with the
Sudanese authorities and
parties to work to establish a
State where human rights is
central and the rule of law is
upheld. They will continue to
follow-up on the situation in
the Sudan.
Mr. Aristide Nononsi (Benin)
was designated as the new
Independent Expert on the
human rights situation in
Sudan by the UN Human Rights
Council in 2014...
Mr. Clement Nyaletsossi Voule,
from Togo, was appointed as
United Nations Special
Rapporteur on the right to
peaceful assembly and
association in March 2018."
Meanwhile AI counts at least
37 dead, and now there's video
of Al-Sudani newspaper
journalist Yassir Abdallah
taken to hospital after
being assaulted by security
personnel who fired ammunition
into newspaper’s office. The
protests have spread and
Bashir's Rapid Support Forces
are being deployed in
Khartoum. Still silence from
Guterres, now on a murky
publicly funded junket with a
major conflict
of interest. In Sudan
Bashir has suspended
universities in Khartoum and
sought to cut the Internet.
Guterres is missing in action,
not even disclosing where he
is or how much it costs the
public. Birds of a feather.
Relatedly,
on November 23 the European
Union said
that "High
Representative/Vice-President
Federica Mogherini met today
with El-Dirdeiry Mohamed
Ahmed, Minister of Foreign
Affairs of the Republic of
Sudan. They discussed the
latest developments in
EU-Sudan relations and in the
Horn of Africa.
Federica Mogherini emphasised
that the EU is ready to engage
in dialogue and cooperation
with Sudan in view of further
progress on internal political
and economic reforms as well
as as well as its contribution
to peace and security in the
region.
The EU is closely following
developments with regard to
the preparations for 2020
elections. In this regard, the
High
Representative/Vice-President
Mogherini emphasised the
importance of a conducive
environment leading to
credible elections." No
mention that Bashir is under
an arrest warrant after
indictment for genocide. And
what, you asks, has the EU
done about the accelerating
slaughter of Anglophones in
Cameroon? We'll have more on
this - and on EU (in) action
on Guterres turning the UN
into a place of censorship for
corruption.
This week,
banned by Guterres from
attending and asking questions
at the UN noon briefing as I
am done under Kofi Annan (Rest
in Peace) and even Ban
Ki-moon, on September 10 I
submitted questions in writing
to Haq, to lead spokesman
Stephane Dujarric, to
Guterres' e-mail address and
that of his Deputy and Global
Communicator Alison Smale,
including this one: “September
10-1: Please confirm or deny
that Antonio Guterres has met
with Omar al Bashir.
Separately, if he met Bashir
in 2012, and if so why, and
when the ICC was informed.”
Not that day but
the next, Dujarric replied
adding his response in capital
letters: “September 10-1:
Please confirm or deny that
Antonio Guterres has met with
Omar al Bashir. Separately, if
he met Bashir in 2012, and if
so why, and when the ICC was
informed. NO CONFIRMATION.”
This seemed
strange, given Haq's answer on
29 January 2018, so on
September 12 Inner City Press
asked, “September 10-1 / Sept
12-4: Please confirm or deny
that Antonio Guterres has met
with Omar al Bashir.
Separately, if he met Bashir
in 2012, and if so why, and
when the ICC was informed. You
wrote, “NO CONFIRMATION.” But
here was Deputy Spokesman
Haq's answer to me on 29
January 2018 (before I was
banned from attending and
asking questions at briefing
71 days now): Video here,
picked up here,
among other places.
So how can you say “no
confirmation”? Is your Office
/ SG Guterres retracting what
was said at the 29 Jan 2018
briefing?”
After conducting
an empty briefing from which
Inner City Press was banned by
Guterres and Smale, and that
again had no a single question
on Africa (in fact, one
Dujarric's and Haq's favored
interlocuters used the
Press-less briefing to say
that the corruption of Ng Lap
Seng and the UN Office of
South South Cooperation was
“fabricated”), Haq sent this:
"Regarding the 29 January 2018
noon briefing, I made clear at
that time, as the transcript
itself shows, that there was
no formal scheduled meeting;
they were in the same (large)
venue at the same time:
Question [Inner
City Press]: And did he
meet [Omar al] Bashir? This
reported… I heard your litany
of countries and I couldn't
quite keep up with them, and I
didn't see a readout. But the
Foreign Minister of Sudan has
said that he met with Omar
al-Bashir, who's indicted by
the ICC (International
Criminal Court), as you know,
for genocide and war crimes.
Did he meet with him? And
what… what… is this a change
of policy?
Spokesman:
It's not a change of policy.
They were both at the same
summit. In that context, they
did meet with each other on
the grounds of the sort of
operational necessity that
does allow the
Secretary-General to meet from
time to time with him. That
doesn't obviate the need, of
course, for respect of the
International Criminal Court.
[Inner City
Press] Question: But was
Sudan in the list of countries
that you read out just at the
top of the briefing? And if
not, why not?
Spokesman: It was not,
because it was not a formal
scheduled meeting."
So
apparently Guterres and his
enablers believe he can meet
with alleged war criminals as
long as he doesn't write it
down on his schedule. We have
more details on the 2012
meeting(s) but they will be in
a longer profile currently
planned for publication when
Guterres returns from his 15th
publicly funded junket to
Lisbon. By banning Inner City
Press they have tried to make
its reporting more difficult.
This is censorship - but the
reporting is not impossible
and will continue. Watch this
site.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2015 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|
,
