Question of Ban Ki-moon's Role in N. Korea Funding
Unanswered for Two Weeks
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN
UNITED NATIONS, March 20 -- During his
eleven weeks as UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon has repeatedly called for "the
highest standards of ethics and integrity" and, relatedly, for transparency. Mr.
Ban released a copy of his UN
financial disclosure,
as he had done in his previous position as South Korean foreign minister.
But for two weeks, in response
to
requests
to know how much money the South Korean government transferred to North Korea
during the time he was Foreign Minister, no answers have been received. Rather
his staff has argued, as recently as Tuesday, that this information is
irrelevant and will not be provided. Beyond possible conflict of interest
issues, some now wonder if this stonewalling might not be related to the place
of aid-to-North-Korea issues in the current elections in South Korea. In either
case, so much for transparency and openness to the press.
Three weeks into his tenure,
faced with a reported scandal in the North Korean operations of the UN
Development Program, Mr. Ban
called for an "urgent audit"
of how UN agencies, funds and programs spend money in North Korea and elsewhere.
Three days after this announcement, the scope of the audit was
narrowed.
Inner City Press asked for comment on
North Korean spending and hiring from, among others, the UN World Health
Organization, the UN World Food Program, UNICEF and the UN Population Fund.
UNICEF acknowledged making payments in hard currency -- precisely the practice
which UNDP's executive committee has now explicitly prohibited -- as did WFP. In
response to a direct question of whether the World Health Organization received
$10 million from South Korea while Ban Ki-moon was foreign minister, WHO
spokeswoman Christine McNab wrote to Inner City Press that, "Yes, last year
South Korea committed to providing the equivalent of US 10 million per year as
support to DPRK through WHO for health-related humanitarian assistance, for
three years."
Following the journalistic mantra about
following the money, on March 5 Inner City Press went to inquire into this with
the UN's Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary General, where a request
was made that the question be submitted in writing. It was:
Subj: Questions
re North Korea, UNDP suspension, audit, South Korean aid to DPRK, thanks
To:
Spokesperson
From: Inner
City Press
Date: 3/5/2007
10:14:30 AM Eastern Standard Time
Good morning.
This is a question that I came into the OSSG earlier this morning to ask, was
advised to direct it to you by email:
--what role if
any did Ban Ki-moon play while with the Republic of Korea government in South
Korean aid to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea? If any, did any of this
aid involve UN funds, programs or agencies? If any, could any of this aid be
within the scope of the urgent audits Mr. Ban called for on Jan. 19, as modified
Jan. 22?
Context:
following UNDP's (quiet, online only) announcement that it suspended its
operations in North Korea on March 1, Inner City Press has heard from sources
information that gives rise to the above question, as well as to other questions
posed directly to UNDP and to the Board of Auditors. (Including what impact the
suspension of operations will have on the audit, on which we understand the 90
clock is already ticking). I'd wanted to just orally ask the above questions in
your office, now do so by email. Please let me know as soon as there are
responses.
The spokesperson referred the question to
Soung-ah Choi, who joined the UN along with Ban Ki-moon and is often seen
accompanying him through the halls of Headquarters, or at his side when he takes
questions from reporters, for example from Inner City Press about Darfur after
the February Security Council luncheon.
Ms. Choi did not answer the question, but
rather directed Inner City Press to call an Ambassador Oh (Joon) at the South
Korean mission to the UN. Inner City Press called Ambassador Oh's line, three
times. The first time his secretary said he would call back shortly. After
Inner City Press left a voice mail with the question it wanted answered, another
call was made, and then another.
Ten days passed without any
answer from Ambassador Oh. Inner City Press asked another South Korean mission
staffer, who said that the appropriate Ambassador was not Mr. Oh, but rather an
individual who would not be back to New York for some week. Thereupon, Inner
City Press asked the question at the UN noon briefing on March 9 (video
here).
From the
transcript:
Inner City
Press: Earlier this week, I tried to ask your office for a number of when Mr.
Ban was the Foreign Affairs and Trade Minister for South Korea, how much aid
came through that department, through the UN agencies, to North Korea, I was
referred to the South Korean Mission and I have received no answer from them.
So, I'm...
Spokesperson:
That is a question that should be addressed to the South Korean Government.
Question: ...As
a journalistic matter, it seems like if he’s ordering the audit and some of the
things that will be found in the audit, not to say that there's anything wrong
with it, will be in fact, funding that he signed off on... it seems to me like a
legitimate question. Or maybe your office can help get an answer. What I was
told from the South Korean Mission is that the Ambassador who works on that is
now back in Korea and we don’t know when he’s coming back.
Spokesperson:
I’m sure the South Korean Government has a spokesperson that you could probably
address those questions to.
Subsequently, Soung-ah Choi summoned
Inner City Press into her office. She said that when Ban Ki-moon commented on
Inner City Press' article, she had not told him that Inner City Press
misidentified Ambassador Oh as involved in South Korea - North Korea relations,
when she had referred to relations with international organizations. She
objected to Inner City Press' use of the phrase "spin machine." She asked Inner
City Press if a tape of the initial conversation in her office could be
produced, "because I have one," she said, indicating a Windows Media file on her
desktop computer. Mr.
Ban: Setting an example?
Inner City Press committed to Ms. Choi
change the description of Ambassador Oh -- who had and has still not responded
-- but asked how and by whom the question would be answered.
Soung-ah Choi now referred Inner City
Press to a person she called her "old boss" in public relations at the South
Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT), providing a telephone
number in Seoul.
On March 19, Inner City Press called the
number in Seoul and was told that the person referred to was in Beijing for the
Six Party Talks. Inner City Press asked for the individual's e-mail address, to
submit the question in writing, and was told yslee81 [at] mofat.go.kr. (A South
Korea mission staffer has since stated that this is Lee Yoen-su). Copying Ms.
Choi and the Spokesperson, Inner City Press wrote:
Subj: Fwd:
Questions re North Korea, UNDP suspension, audit, South Korean aid to DPRK,
thanks
To: yslee81
[at] mofat.go.kr
CC: UN
Spokespersons
From: Inner
City Press
Date: 3/19/2007
5:04:22 AM Eastern Standard Time
Hello -- These
are press questions from media at the United Nations in New York, referred to
you by Soung-ah Choi of the Office of the Spokesperson for Ban Ki-moon (OSSG).
--How much
money was transferred from the Republic of Korea to the Democratic People's
Republic of Korea while Ban Ki-moon was Foreign Minister? How much of this was
transferred through UN agencies, funds or programs? Which ones?
--What role if
any did Ban Ki-moon play while with the Republic of Korea government in South
Korean aid to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea? If any, did any of this
aid involve UN funds, programs or agencies? If any, could any of this aid be
within the scope of the urgent audits Mr. Ban called for on Jan. 19, as modified
Jan. 22?
I asked the
second of these two sets of question two weeks ago to the OSSG (see below) and
got referred to the Republic of Korea's mission to the UN, to Ambassador Oh (Joon),
with whom I left three messages without reply now two weeks later.
On Friday,
Soung-ah, whom I am cc-ing, told me I should have called the Foreign Ministry in
Seoul, and gave me your number. I called it Sunday-Monday and was told you are
in Beijing, and was given this e-mail address (Soung-ah, please e-confirm that
the address now sent to is the correct one, thanks).
While I
understand you are busy in Beijing, please confirm receipt of this e-mail and
provide a response as quickly as possible (on deadline), by referring this to
another appropriate person there if necessary.
While sent before dawn on Monday in New
York, there was no response until noon on Tuesday, when Soung-ah Choi sent an
email during the UN's noon briefing, "mathew, please come see me."
Immediately following the noon
briefing -- at which Inner City Press asked about the UN and climate change, for
Ban Ki-moon's position on the Human Rights Council's special rapporteurs, and
whether the UN would be responding to the African Union's request for help in
Somalia, video of briefing
here --
Inner City Press went up to Soung-ah Choi's office, thinking that now at last
the questions would be answered.
Ms. Choi began by saying that Inner City
Press' question were not clear, particularly the formulation "How much money was
transferred from the Republic of Korea to the Democratic People's Republic of
Korea while Ban Ki-moon was Foreign Minister? How much of this was transferred
through UN agencies, funds or programs? Which ones?"
Referring to South Korea as "we," Ms.
Choi said that are "at least twenty different kinds of money to be transferred
to North Korea" and that "it has nothing to do with Ban Ki-moon." She argued
that "Ban Ki-moon did not do anything as Ban Ki-moon." She said that no one
keeps track of money in the way Inner City Press has requested, and that "no one
stays longer than a year," though Mr. Ban "stayed a very long time" as Foreign
Minister.
While stating that the English
version of the South Korean Ministry of Unification "sucks" -- click
here to
verify -- Ms. Choi repeated asked if Inner City Press was using it, trying to
self-answer the questions.
Yes, but it is less than useful. Why don't you
send me the link --
But that means you have not used the
site, Ms. Choi said triumphantly. She again chided Inner City Press' question
for not specifying which kind of aid was referred to.
All of it, then, broken down by
type.
"You want us to do your work for you. You can go
beg the South Korean government if you want," Soung-ah Choi said, then laughed.
Inner City Press stated that now that two
weeks had passed, this process would be reported. On the way out, Inner City
Press stopped to make the Spokesperson aware of the difficulties, and then set
about composing this interim story. An argument raised is that Mr. Ban is now
Secretary-General, and does not want any focus to be on what he did before
assuming the post. But this is the nature of politics and of journalist, to have
to address possible conflicts of interest due to past activities, holdings and
posts.
Sources since contacted by Inner City
Press note that the critique of the Roh administration, under which Mr. Ban
served, being advanced by the opposition GNP party includes that too much money
was given to North Korea, for too little. They note that in the Kaesong
Industrial Park, the same issues as in the "urgent audit" exist, of seconded
employees chosen by the Kim Jong Il government, and payment in hard currency
directly to that government. Without exception, they advise that the simple
question of how much South Korean money was transferred to North Korea while Ban
Ki-moon was foreign minister should be answered.
As a matter of transparency, does
Mr. Ban agree? Developing.
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540
At the UN, Auditors Say They Can't Speak, IAEA Won't
Say How It Pays in North Korea
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN
UNITED NATIONS, March 14 -- The mystery
around the delayed "urgent audit" that Ban Ki-moon ordered on January 19
continues to grow, fueled by the UN system's lack of transparency. On Tuesday,
the spokesman for the UN Development Program, David Morrison, answered
three of Inner City Press' question
by saying, you have to wait until the audit is finished, you have to ask the
auditors, for example why the beginning of the audit was postponed for week,
from March 12 to March 19.
But on Wednesday, the Executive Secretary
of the UN Board of Auditors, Swatantra Goolsarran, wrote to Inner City Press
that he cannot answer any questions unless authorized by the Board. Inner City
Press asked Ban Ki-moon's spokesperson to ensure that Mr. Goolsarran is told
that he can and should speak to the press, on matters within his expertise. This
was a phrase Ban Ki-moon used in his first press encounter upon become Secretary
General, that he would encourage UN officials to speak to the media in matters
within their expertise, said otherwise, not as whistleblowers but to answer
factual questions.
Another factual question sent to a
UN-affiliated agency -- Inner City Press' March 12 question to the UN
International Atomic Energy Agency as to how they will make payments in North
Korea -- was went with a resounding "no comment" on Wednesday.
Mr.
Ban and Mr. ElBaradei spoke Feb. 23 - but apparently
not about currency, the audit or transparency
On Monday, this was sent to IAEA:
Here at UN
Headquarters earlier today, UNDP spokesman David Morrison told us reporters that
(1) the IAEA had asked UNDP to arrange to make payments for the IAEA in the
Democratic People's Republic of Korea, but that (2) in light of UNDP's March 1
'suspension of operations' in the DPRK, due to inability to stop using seconded
staff and paying in hard currency, UNDP told IAEA to find another UN agency to
make payments for it in DPRK. [Mr. Morrison encouraged us to ask IAEA how they
were paying.]
Can you confirm
that IAEA asked UNDP to make payments for it, and then said to find another UN
agency; Can you state which UN agency was selected to make payments, and in
what currency; and Does the IAEA visit to DPRK involve handlers and/or seconded
staff?
On Wednesday, the IAEA's Ayhan Evrensel
wrote back:
"Dear Matthew,
Sorry to get back to you late. We cannot tell anything about the planning at
this moment, and I doubt if we will ever get into such logistical arrangements.
You should have received my other mail just a minute before this (about the
presser ElBaradei will hold in Beijing); I don't have any other information."
So in interim recap: citing the need for
transparency, Ban Ki-moon called for an urgent audit into UN agencies paying in
hard currency in North Korea. However, when the audit gets delayed, no one can
explain it. UNDP and the UN's Controller refer the press to the Board of
Auditors, whose Executive Secretary says he cannot speak to the media. And
another UN agency, IAEA, which was going to use UNDP for payments in North Korea
-- and which UNDP while urging the media to ask IAEA who it will use, brags it
will no longer serve -- now says it won't disclose the "logics" of how or in
what currency it will pay in North Korea. But isn't that lack of transparency
one of the ways the problem that Ban Ki-moon says he is trying to address began
in the first place?
The Executive Secretary of the UN Board
of Auditors wrote:
Subj: Re: Press
question on audit, from today's noon briefing: why was audit pushed back a week,
etc, thanks
Date: 3/14/2007
10:19:03 AM Eastern Standard Time
From: Swatantra
Goolsarran
To: Inner City
Press
Dear Mr. Lee,
This is to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail. I am a United Nations staff
member rendering administrative and technical support to the UN Board of
Auditors. As such, unless I am authorized by the Board to do so, I would be
unable to provide information to the media on any matter connected with the work
of the Board. Such authorization has not been given to me. I trust that you
appreciate my position on the matter.
While appreciating Mr. Goolsarran's
position, since it was Ban Ki-moon who called for the audit and for
transparency, Mr. Ban's spokesperson has been asked to find a way that someone
can answer questions about this delayed "urgent audit."
Meanwhile, UNDP has not provided the
information Mr. Morrison said in the hallway on Monday he would produce, and has
not answered any of the emailed questions posed in follow-up to Tuesday's
briefing. Ah, transparency...
From
the (garbled)
transcript:
Inner
City Press: Thanks for yesterday having Mr. Morrison answer questions with you.
On a number of points he said we have to wait for the audit or you have to ask
the auditors. So I wanted to know two things. One, when the audit is done, is it
going to be made public?
Spokesperson: I assume so. I can only ask. I’ll ask the auditors.
Inner City Press: I guess since Ban Ki-moon called for it. That’s why I’m
asking. But I understand, maybe you’ll answer it. Many people have said ask the
auditors various things. So I asked this Mr. (inaudible) who Mr. (inaudible)
told me to ask. And he’s responded today and said he’s not authorized to speak
to the press. So I’m wondering, since I kind of hit a dead end. So my question
would be either whether can Ban Ki-moon authorize someone to speak to the press?
Just on simple questions.
Spokesperson: He won’t speak until the report is done, until they are finished
with their investigation.
Question: Which is when?
Spokesperson: I don’t know. You have a 90 day (inaudible).
Inner City Press: Mr. Morrison said yesterday that it was postponed for a week,
but he wouldn’t say why it was postponed. Ask the auditors. So I asked the
auditors and they say we are not authorized to speak to the press. But it’s a
simple question. It’s not asking to pre-judge the audit or anything. I think it
only helps the UN to say “here’s why we postponed it for a week.” I don’t need
to get into commentary. I guess I want to ask you who can speak for the
auditors?
Spokesperson: I will ask who has the right to speak on their behalf.
Again, because a number of Inner City Press'
UN
sources go out of their way to express commitment to serving the poor, and while
it should be unnecessary, Inner City Press is compelled to conclude this
installment in a necessarily-ongoing series by saluting the stated goals of the
UN agencies and many of their staff. Keep those cards, letters and emails coming, and phone
calls too, we apologize for any phone tag, but please continue trying, and keep
the information flowing.
At UNDP, Audit Delayed and Questions Deflected As
Other Scandals Brew
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN: New Analysis
UNITED NATIONS, March 13 -- The urgent audit of the
UN Development Program called for by Ban Ki-moon on January 19 has been
postponed for another week. UNDP spokesman David Morrison on Tuesday took
questions on camera, and stated that UNDP has expended $47.5 million in North
Korea in the past decade, $10.88 million of which was on behalf of other UN
agencies, "the vast majority" being for the UN Population Fund. Asked about the
$151 million UN Consolidated Appeal for the country issued in 2004, Morrison
said he was not aware of the appeal and would get back to reporters with answers
about it. Ten hours later, the answers had been provided to this or several
other follow-up questions posed by Inner City Press.
Morrison largely deflected
questions by referring to the now-postponed audit, and saying he can't or won't
answer until the audit is completed. Video
here,
from Minute 30:50 to 35:22. Morrison said, "On questions of site access,
currency, computers and inventories... we think we should all wait for the
results" of the audit that has yet to begin.
A March 1 memorandum from Mr. Swatantra
Goolsarran of the UN Board of Auditors to Kemal Dervis and the heads of UNFPA,
UNOPS and UNICEF said that the audit would begin on March 12. Tuesday Inner City
Press asked Morrison to explain the new one-week delay. Morrison said to ask the
auditors, then added that it is his understanding that they couldn't get all the
auditors in place by March 12. The memorandum states that there are only three
auditors: team leader Ms. Odette Anthoo of South Africa, Mr. Dioni Abalos of the
Philippines and Ms. Martine Latare of France.
Tellingly, Morrison had less than a
week ago been quoted as to his "understanding was that the agency had never had
problems with site visits." Tuesday Inner City Press asked about this quote and
Morrison claimed he "did not say they never had problem." But any discussion of
the lack of access, according to him, must wait until the completion of a
still-not-begun audit.
Work-for-food
project in N. Korea, UNDP not shown
Separately, the World Food Program's New
York spokeswoman has explained to Inner City Press why WFP was not included in
Mr. Goolsarran's March 1 memo, nor in the Board of Auditor's audit:
Subj: Audit
Date: 3/13/2007
10:10:36 AM Eastern Standard Time
From:
Spokeswoman of WFP
To: Inner City
Press
Dear Matthew,
here's more on the audit request:
WFP does not
fall under the control of the Board of Auditors (historic reasons dating back to
our time as part of FAO whose EB requests external audits). Our external audits
can only be requested by our Executive Board. WFP's Executive Board at its first
regular session from 19-21 February, took the following decision:
"Noting the
Secretary General's proposal, the Executive Board decided to request the WFP
external auditor to carry out a special audit of the WFP operations in the
Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea as a matter of priority and report its
findings to the Board. The WFP external auditor might wish to consult and
coordinate with the UN Board of Auditors which may be undertaking a special
audit of United Nations organizations in the Democratic Peoples Republic of
Korea, including the United Nations Funds and Programs that fall within its
mandate."
Given this
decision, it is now up to the WFP external auditor to set up its audit schedule.
Hope this helps.
It does, including by contract
to UNDP. When UNDP's Morrison on Tuesday was asked to explain still not having
provided information that he on Monday committed to produce, he again referred
to waiting to the audit. Given that on Monday he said, we'll get back to you
with that, what changed in the past 24 hours? Nothing, Morrison said. And in the
hours after Tuesday's noon briefing, the status quo of non-response was
maintained. Two separate controversies that Inner City Press asked about --
video
here,
from Minute 40:30 to 42:39 -- and on which Inner City Press submitted follow-up
email reminders including to Kemal Dervis, Ad Melkert and others, were left
entirely unaddressed by UNDP. Watch this site.
After telling Inner City Press on Monday
that he had no idea what UN Resident Representative Timo Pakkala is bringing
from Pyongyang to New York on March 17, Tuesday Morrison acknowledged having
said that Pakkala is bringing electronic records, "the highest priority
documents."
Within UNDP, there is
speculation one of the two UN official with intimate knowledge of the program"
quoted in the
Chicago Tribune's article which
called UNDP an "ATM" for Kim Jong Il may be Timo Pakkala, and that the May 2006
warning
referred to by the Tribune was
a communication from Pakkala to Kemal Dervis. Others ask, what could Pakkala
gain by blowing the whistle? Morrison on Tuesday referred repeatedly to
staffers' "recourse" in UNDP, and to "whistle-blower" protections. But the
stakes are high.
UN
and UNDP staff who have due to their employment G4 visas to be in the United
States, would be required to leave the U.S. within thirty days of termination.
A simple reform that the U.S. Congress could enact, advance earlier by this
publication and to be reported on from Washington DC later this week, would be
to amend immigration rules to extend any whistleblower's right to remain in the
U.S.. Developing.
On N.
Korea, Ban Ki-moon Refers Press to UNDP, Which Refuses to Provide Promised
Information
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS, March
12 -- The UN Development Program on Monday flatly denied a
Chicago Tribune story that
it has paid envelopes of cash in North Korea, and that it has had an difficulty
in visiting projects in the country, including those executed by the Kim Jong Il
government.
Speaking
to reporters off-camera after the regularly scheduled (and
televised)
noon briefing,
UNDP spokesman David Morrison complained that when he was interviewed by the
Chicago Tribune, he was not asked about envelopes of cash nor about the 300 (or
298) phantom computers that ended up in the
story.
In response to questions from correspondents including Inner City Press,
Morrison promised to verify and provide at least five pieces of information.
Inner City Press twice verbally asked to be provide with the promised
information, and committed the request to an email by 2 p.m. Monday. This
request is set forth below. Eight hours later, UNDP had not provided any of the
information to Inner City Press.
During
the noon briefing, as
transcribed by
the UN, Inner City Press asked:
Inner City Press: On the North Korea
update you gave and on the audits, I’m definitely glad that we'll speak to Mr.
Morrison afterwards. But this is for you, as the Spokesperson for Ban Ki-moon.
Is the UN-administered staff, Timo Pakkala, the Resident Representative leaving;
and, if so, who is going to be Ban Ki-moon's Representative in Pyongyang now
that he leaves? And, also on the audit, we've seen a memo from the Board of
Auditors to four agencies -- UNDP, UNOPS, UNFPA and UNICEF... Has there been any
response to Ban Ki-moon's 28 February letter?
Spokesperson: I think you should direct
all those questions to UNDP. We've already answered as much as we could.
Inner City Press: There are three other
agencies. That’s why I'm directing it to you. I don't think he can answer for
UNFPA or anybody.
Spokesperson: Well, the process is
continuing. I told you that the other day. It's starting with UNDP. And it's
going to continue for other agencies.
Inner City Press: But why is WFP not on
the list, but UNICEF is? Who do we ask that? Obviously it's not UNDP.
Spokesperson: I can find out for you from
the Board of Auditors how they are going to proceed and what is going to be the
next audit.
Inner City Press: Is Timo Pakkala
leaving? Who is the Resident Rep or Resident Coordinator? Who is going to
represent the UN?
Spokesperson: This is a question to be
answered by UNDP.
UNDP's
David Morrison did not answer who the next UN Resident Representative in North
Korea will be. In fact, Mr. Morrison claimed not to know the name of the Deputy
Resident Representative being left behind -- that would be
Vineet Bhatia -- and, of the country officer whom Mr.
Morrison said has been visiting North Korea four times a year, Morrison claimed
not to know his last name, only his first: Napoleon (that would be Napoleon
Navarro).
David
Morrison: once upon a time
One correspondent asked Morrison if he is
in any position to authoritatively deny the
Chicago Tribune's report. Morrison said that he is. Inner City Press asked
if UNDP administered and handled the $10 million that the World Health
Organization had responded that it received from South Korea for North Korea.
"I don't
know about WHO," Morrison answered. "I do know that there is no earmarked South
Korean money that has gone to UNDP going back, I believe, ten years. There is no
trust fund for North Korea that UNDP has been involved in." We'll see. Even in
UNDP's most recently public audit, there is for example a "UNDP / Republic of
Korea Trust Fund." That is only one example.
Morrison was asked, repeatedly, to
provide a total figure of money UNDP has expended in North Korea, on its own
behalf and for other UN agencies. He was asked, "Can we get the figure?" He
answered, "Sure." Inner City Press asked Kemal Dervis for this figure on
February 1, 2007,
and never got it. Ad Melkert was asked for the figure in mid-February, and still
not. On March 12, UNDP spokesman David Morrison promised the figure, and nine
hours later had not provide it, nor any explanation.
Morrison did say that the DPRK has not
responded to UNDP's March 1
letter announcing the
suspension of operations, and that UNDP has told the International Atomic Energy
Agency to find another UN agency to make its payments in North Korea for now.
Morrison was asked if UNDP has any system to make sure its payments for other
agency actually go for the stated purpose. Morrison said he would check and get
back. Nine hours later, no answer had been provided. Morrison said he does not
know how long UNDP's lease in North Korea runs for.
While he is quoted in the Chicago Tribune
that Timo Pakkala is bringing documents from Pyongyang to New York in electronic
form, when Inner City Press on Monday asked him what documents Mr. Pakkala is
bring, Morrison said, "I don't know."
Unrelated to North Korea --
and Inner City Press has many such questions, but it seems pointless to ask
them, when even promised information about North Korea is not provided --
Morrison was asked to describe UNDP's programs in Zimbabwe, and if they will be
modified in light of
last weekend's crackdown on all opposition
by Robert Mugabe, and Ban Ki-moon's
condemnation
of the crackdown. Morrison answered to the first question, about current
programs, "I can look into it." As to the second question, to which Inner City
Press added the specific question if UNDP will continue to
push for a Mugage-sponsored human rights
commission, Morrison said, "I
don't know." But we've heard that before...
Here are questions Inner City Press
reiterated in writing to two UNDP spokespeople at 2 p.m. on Monday:
Subject: Re:
DPR Korea - follow-up to "scrum," the various items, thanks in advance
From: Inner
City Press
To: david.morrison [at] undp.org>, christina.lonigro [at] undp.org
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:00:13
Hello --
Following up
after the post-noon briefing hallways scrum, I want to be sure to get the
various things you said you'd look into and get back with:
--the overall
figure / dollar volume that UNDP expended in / for North Korea, including on
behalf of other UN agencies;
--whether in
payments of other agencies, there has been anything other than purchase and bill
accordingly;
--if UNDP has
in place any system to check on the use of funds paid for others, any (by
analogy) Know Your Customer system such as banks have;
--information
on visits by UNDP headquarters staff to North Korea.
Also, would
like to know when the Pyongyang lease expires, how much it costs and how and to
whom it is paid. And please do keep informed regarding the new Resident
Representative.
There are
other, non-North Korea questions, and even North Korea but non-scrum questions,
but not in this email.
There were and are even some "non-scrum"
and non-North Korea questions.
But none of the above had been answered by 10 p.m. Monday, eight hours after the
questions were posed in writing. Developing.
UN Women's Week Ends As Ban Ki-moon Dodges Mercenary
Questions
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN
UNITED NATIONS, March 9 -- At the end of a week on
the status of women, Ban Ki-moon spoke Monday morning before a group of
Ambassador's wives. "I'll always stand behind you, not in front of you," he
said. Then he added from the podium in the UN's Conference Room 1, "But when I
have to speak out, I'll always speak in front of you."
The
members of the Ambassadors' wives club, called the Women's International Forum,
laughed politely. The response stalled and then stopped as Ban shifted the topic
to management reform. He noted again he's made public his financial statement,
and said "I hope my senior managers will follow my lead." This is one reform not
dependent on any committee. Ban could have conditioned his nominations on
disclosures of finance. Instead, Messrs. Holmes and Pascoe are in without
disclosing, and Ms. Barcena has said she'd like to disclosure, but only
if other do.
Ban spoke of Somalia and
Darfur, a topic on which he received a 14-page letter in Arabic from Sudanese
president Omar al-Bashir. Ban said he may speak with Bashir on Saturday. In the
hallway afterwards, accompanied by his spokeswoman Soung-ah Choi, Mr. Ban did
not stop to take questions. Nor, as reflected by the
noon briefing's transcript,
does the South Korean mission answer questions referred to it:
Inner City
Press: Earlier this week, I tried to ask your office for a number of when Mr.
Ban was the Foreign Affairs and Trade Minister for South Korea, how much aid
came through that department, through the UN agencies, to North Korea, I was
referred to the South Korean Mission and I have received no answer from them.
So, I'm...
Spokesperson:
That is a question that should be addressed to the South Korean Government.
Question: I
guess I'm saying, the reason I'm asking is not that there's any, just as a
journalistic matter, it seems like if he's ordering the audit and some of the
things that will be found in the audit, not to say that there’s anything wrong
with it, will be in fact, funding that he signed off on... it seems to me like a
legitimate question. Or maybe your office can help get an answer. What I was
told from the South Korean Mission is that the Ambassador who works on that is
now back in Korea and we don't know when he's coming back. Mr. (inaudible) [Amb.
Oh Joon] the one I was referred to...
Spokesperson:
I'm sure the South Korean Government has a spokesperson that you could probably
address those questions to.
The spin machine is operating on overdrive: first the Office of the Spokesperson
for the Secretary General declined to answer the question, and referred it to a South Korean
Ambassador who has refused to respond. Then, when this is raised at the noon
briefing, it is not included in the UN's self-serving "Highlights"
of the briefing, click
here to
view. But the questions will not go away.
Mr.
Ban, in front of skepticism
Also
dodged was a question about the use of
mercenaries in Somalia:
Inner City Press: ...these reports that
the US in support of the African Union
Mission in Somalia has hired, I
don’t know if you call them mercenaries, or private military contractors... I
heard Mr. Ban earlier today say that he anticipates that becoming a UN force in
Somalia. Does the UN have any view, of in these peacekeeping missions, whether
it's in this case AU, or later UN, the use of paid, private military firms like
(inaudible), in peacekeeping?
Spokesperson:
Well, it is an issue that I know has come up in the past. As for the UN’s
operation in Somalia, as you know, I think we are still at a point where a lot
of work will have to go into whether the UN is going to be involved there or
not. So, there's a lot more discussion on that to be held. But no, we do not
have a direct comment on your question involving the AU.
Meanwhile, after too few question were
asked at a morning press conference marking the end of the two week long
Commission on the Status of Women meeting, a second briefing was arranged, in
which Carolyn Hannan explained the four pending resolutions, on female genital
mutilation (sponsored by South Africa), forced marriage (sponsored by the United
States), HIV / AIDS (sponsored by South Africa, to the surprise of some, at
least readers of the recent issues of the New Yorker magazine) and on woman in
Palestine. Inner City Press asked about this last -- would it, as happens so
often at the UN, lead to blocking votes?
"Yes, that happens every year," Ms.
Hannan answered. Which lead another correspondent to ask, why do you introduce
the same resolutions year after year?
It's a point of principle for some
countries," Ms. Hannan said. The correspondent shook his -- yes, his -- head.
Inner City Press asked about an idea that has been floated, for the World Bank
and IMF to condition financing on the respect of women's rights. Ms. Hannan said
that next year's meeting will be on the question of funding, and added that this
type of conditionality has long been debated, but is current disfavored, as
hurting the people that conditions seek to help. Is this similar to sanctions?
Seems like it. We will have more on all this.
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here, and
some are available in the ProQuest service.
Copyright 2006 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540