After
Brahimi Spills
Beans on Saudi
& Khan
al-Asal, UN
Blurs Chlorine
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, June
9 -- Now that
Lakhdar
Brahimi has
quit as envoy
to Syria, he
is letting it
all hang out.
Inner City
Press wrote
about it on
June 8, and on
June 9 asked
UN spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric,
video here:
Inner
City
Press: The
Lakhdar
Brahimi
interview with
Der Spiegel,
I’m
sure you’ve
seen it and
among other
things, he
says Saudi
Arabia
refused to
meet with him,
not wanting a
peaceful
settlement. He
said
that the
chemical
weapons attack
in Khan
al-Assal was
in all
probability
caused by the
opposition,
and I just
wanted to
know... I
can keep going
down this
litany. I
understand
that he’s now
a
private
individual,
but factually
speaking,
let’s say on
the Saudi
issue, since
he represented
the
Secretary-General
as well as the
League of Arab
States at the
time, is it
true? Can you
confirm that
Saudi Arabia
declined to
meet with him
and what does
this say about
Brahimi
replacement
also
representing
the Arab
League?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
I think,
obviously, Mr.
Brahimi’s
interview was
done as
a private
citizen. He no
longer is the
Joint
Representative.
However, the
Secretary-General’s
own position
on a number of
these
issues has
been expressed
fairly
directly
either by me
or by the
Secretary-General
himself. I
think Mr.
Brahimi over
the past, over
the time of
his work as
the Joint
Special
Representative,
has been
fairly candid
about his
opinion. On
the issue of
the use of
chlorine, that
is something
that the OPCW
[Organisation
for the
Prohibition of
Chemical
Weapons]has
been looking
into. And as
the
Secretary-General
himself said
here in this
room, this
time of sort
of interim
between,
without an
official Joint
Representative,
is
being used as
a time for
stock-taking
to see how
that role can
be
best used to
keep the
political
process moving
to work for a
peaceful
end to the
conflict in
Syria.
Inner
City
Press: Because
the Khan
al-Assal was
the attack
that preceded
the larger one
so he was
basically
saying that
the first
reported,
you know, use
of chemical
weapons, the
one that Mr.
Sellström was
sent initially
to
investigate,
was, he
believes, done
by the
opposition.
And since
this… this
seems to be a
pretty major
statement and
it doesn’t
seem to Khan
al-Assal was
ever fully
investigated.
That’s what
many people
said…
Spokesman:
No, I
understand.
You know, I’m
not going to
go on a play
by play
of his
comments. I
think the
Secretary-General’s
own position
has
been very
clear and very
strong and
what Mr.
Brahimi
expressed was
his own
private,
private view.
From
Brahimi's interview
with Der
Speigel:
SPIEGEL:
To
what degree
does this
conflict pose
a threat to
Israel?
Brahimi:
Israel
is very happy.
Things are
going very,
very well for
them. If
Bashar goes
it's great; if
Bashar stays
it's great.
Syria is being
weakened.
Syria had some
kind of
strategic
weapon with
their chemical
weapons and
that's gone.
So Israel is
doing very
well, thank
you very much.
You don't need
to worry about
them.
The UN Office
of the
Spokesperson
refused last
week to
confirm what a
Permanent Five
member of the
UN Security
Council's
Permanent
Representative
told Inner
City Press,
that the UN
Secretariat
doesn't want a
Brahimi
representative
to also
represent the
Arab League.
Brahimi said:
SPIEGEL:
We
have been told
that the
Saudis even
refused to
meet with you.
Brahimi:
That's
a fact. I
think they
didn't like
what I was
saying about a
peaceful and
negotiated
settlement
with
concessions
from both
sides
So, no Arab
League it
would seem.
From the
section on
chemical
weapons:
it
does seem that
in Khan
al-Assal, in
the north, the
first time
chemical
weapons were
used, there is
a likelihood
that it was
used by the
opposition.
Brahimi's
conclusion,
which Der
Spiegel turned
into a
headline:
It
will be become
another
Somalia. It
will not be
divided, as
many have
predicted.
It's going to
be a failed
state, with
warlords all
over the
place.
Just on Inner
City Press
note: Somalia
may not be
"divided," but
Somaliland
(and Puntland)
assert
independence...
On May 13
after Syria
envoy Lakhdar
Brahimi
publicly
resigned at
the UN, UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric
selected who
could ask him
questions, with a
decided slant.
After Brahimi
left, Inner
City Press
asked at the
subsequent
noon briefing
if Brahimi
will return to
work for
Algeria,
specifically
as a
Bouteflika
deputy.
Dujarric said
that should
and could be
posed directly
at Brahimi at
his question
and answer
media stakeout
later in the
day. Video
here.
Inner
City Press
waited. But
when Brahimi
came to the
stakeout,
Dujarric's
deputy Farhan
Haq selected
essentially
the same
questioners as
Dujarric
picked for
Brahimi at
noon. What was
the point?
Beyond
propaganda?
In the
earlier
session, Inner
City Press,
which on
May 3 reported
that former
Tunisian
foreign
minister and
Ben Ali
associate
Kamel Morjane
was being
vetted to
replace
Brahimi, had
this and
another
question to
ask. Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric,
however, made
a selection of
questioners
which left
these out,
while
including the
so-called “Holy Seat”
of the
UN
Correspondents
Association,
become the UN's
Censorship
Alliance.
Brahimi
was
not asked
about his
future plans;
Ban was not
asked about
vetting
Morjane. After
the two left,
Dujarric
continued
taking
questions
along the same
line. When
called on,
Inner City
Press asked
about Morjane
and this: is
Brahimi
planning to
take a role in
Algeria once
his
resignation is
effective on
May 31?
Dujarric
said
that should be
asked to
Brahimi --
what a
surprise --
and then said
without
knowing it to
be true that
it could be
asked later in
the day to
Brahimi after
he briefs the
Security
Council. As he
should know
there are
deadlines:
including two
more questions
pending to be
written about
shortly.
On
this, what
sources tell
Inner City
Press concerns
Brahimi
working with
Bouteflika in
Algeria. Out
of respect for
Brahimi, Inner
City Press
didn't
reported it,
wanted to let
Brahimi
himself
address it on
camera at this
resignation
press
availability.
But no. Watch
this site.
Footnote:
the debate
seems to be
whether
Brahimi's
replacement
should "be an
Arab" -- if
so, North
Africa is seen
as the likely
but shallow
pool -- or,
say, Javier
Solana. We'll
have more on
this -- and on
Dujarric
contradicting
one of the
publications
he called on
for Ban and
Brahimi, that
the UN's
Martin
Griffith has
himself been
Banned from
Damascus....
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|