On
Burundi, Obama
Excluding It
From AGOA, ICP
Asked UN Of
Nkurunziza's
Threat
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
October 30 --
As killings in
Burundi
increase, on
October 23
Inner City
Press asked UN
Ambassador
Matthew
Rycroft about
the status of
the draft
Presidential
Statement in
the UN
Security
Council. He
said there are
differing
views, but the
UK is
concerned
about the
"threat of
genocide." Video here.
On
October 30, US
President
Barack Obama
issued this:
"TO THE
CONGRESS OF
THE UNITED
STATES:
In accordance
with section
506A(a)(3)(B)
of the African
Growth and
Opportunity
Act, as
amended (AGOA)
(19 U.S.C.
2466a(a)(3)(B)),
I am providing
notification
of my intent
to terminate
the
designation of
the Republic
of Burundi
(Burundi) as a
beneficiary
sub-Saharan
African
country under
AGOA.
I am taking
this step
because I have
determined
that the
Government of
Burundi has
not
established or
is not making
continual
progress
toward
establishing
the rule of
law and
political
pluralism, as
required by
the AGOA
eligibility
requirements
outlined in
section 104 of
the AGOA (19
U.S.C. 3703).
In particular,
the continuing
crackdown on
opposition
members, which
has included
assassinations,
extra-judicial
killings,
arbitrary
arrests, and
torture, have
worsened
significantly
during the
election
campaign that
returned
President
Nkurunziza to
power earlier
this year. In
addition, the
Government of
Burundi has
blocked
opposing
parties from
holding
organizational
meetings and
campaigning
throughout the
electoral
process.
Police and
armed youth
militias with
links to the
ruling party
have
intimidated
the
opposition,
contributing
to nearly
200,000
refugees
fleeing the
country since
April 2015.
Accordingly, I
intend to
terminate the
designation of
Burundi as a
beneficiary
sub-Saharan
African
country under
AGOA as of
January 1,
2016."
On
October 28,
Inner City
Press asked UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
another
threat. From
the UN
transcript:
Inner City
Press: this is
a tweet
from the
official
account of
Pierre
Nkurunziza,
President of
Burundi:
"No one living
abroad should
consider
himself
superior to
those who
stayed in
Burundi since
most of them
have left
their families
here."
So people see
this as an
open-source
threat to
retaliate
against the
families of
those who have
fled the
country.
And I'm
wondering…
Spokesman:
I haven't seen
the
tweet. I
shall look at
it.
Inner
City Press
showed it to
him on his way
out. Earlier
on October 28,
Burundi got
162 votes for
the UN Human
Rights
Council, less
than the other
also unopposed
candidates,
but still
enough to get
on the
Council. The
UN Security
Council had
just issued a
Presidential
Statement,
here,
which gave
weight to the
Museveni
"mediation,"
and which the
US
later
"welcomed."
Usually it's
the penholder
(France) which
speaks. But
not here, not
on Burundi
(see Ladsous,
below).
On
October 27,
the UN said
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon called
the AU
(below); Inner
City Press
asked Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric is
any closer to
naming the
envoy he
called
"immanent"
months ago.
Dujarric said
he should have
used another
word.
Inner
City Press
asked Dujarric
of reports
that Burundian
police in the
UN's MINUSCA
mission in
Bangui have
not received
benefits in
months, and of
a letter sent
to Ban and
Herve Ladsous
about the
Burundian
troops.
Dujarric said
he would check
on both. Here
is the full
text of the
UN's read-out:
"Today, the
Secretary-General
called H.E.
Dr. Nkosazana
Dlamini Zuma,
Chairperson of
the African
Union
Commission, to
discuss the
situation in
Burundi.
The
Secretary-General
welcomed the
decision made
by the African
Union’s Peace
and Security
Council on 17
October to
address the
political
impasse and
deteriorating
security
situation in
Burundi. He
noted that
such
comprehensive
and resolute
action could
offer Burundi
the
opportunity to
put an end to
the continuing
violence and
find a
consensual
political
solution on
the way
forward.
The
Secretary-General
assured the
Chairperson of
the African
Union
Commission
that the
United Nations
stands ready
to provide any
support
necessary to
advance the
implementation
of the
measures
agreed upon by
the members of
the African
Union Peace
and Security
Council.
"
On
October 28
Burundi is
poised for
election to
the UN Human
Rights
Council, as
one of five
African Group
candidates for
five seats.
Meanwhile on
October 26,
the European
Union adopted
the letter
to President
Pierre
Nkurunziza
that Inner
City Press
asked the UN
about last
week, here.
Can EU
members on
October 28 not
vote against
Burundi's
"Human Rights"
Council
candidacy at
this time? And
other Western
NGOs coming to
the UN early
this week to
set forth
their
positions,
will they just
phone it in
with regard to
Burundi? Watch
this site.
Inner City
Press: I
wanted to ask
on Burundi,
just this
morning the UK
Ambassador
said that the
UK is
concerned of a
threat of
genocide, is
the word that
he used, so
I'm wondering
under Rights
Up Front what
are your
thoughts about
Burundi and
what the UN or
the
Secretariat
can do.
SG Ban: "On
this genocide
issues, I hope
there should
be some
creative
investigations
by the
relevant
experts and
there should
be, first of
all, a clear
understanding
and
investigations.
And if the
conclusion is
that there
were such kind
of genocide
issues, then
there should
be
accountability,
justice must
prevail and
perpetrators
must be
brought to
justice."
But
what is the UN
Secretariat
DOING about
it?
On
October 22,
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's deputy
spokesperson
Haq:
Inner City
Press: I
wanted to ask
you a question
about
Burundi.
The EU is
preparing a
letter to
invite the
Burundian
parties to
Brussels to
have a
discussion
about
diffusing the
situation.
And I wanted
to know, not
just what does
the UN think
about it, but
is there any
UN role in
this?
And, if not,
what does it
say about the
UN sort of
action on
Burundi?
It's one thing
to defer maybe
to the AU but
this is the
UE. What
is the UN
doing about
this?
Deputy
Spokesman:
We are
following up
with all the
various
initiatives by
regional
parties
including the
African Union
and the
European Union
and, of
course, our
Envoy dealing
with the Great
Lakes Region
has been
appraised of
this so we are
continuing to
follow-up.
ICP:
But, I mean,
is the EU
really, can
you… it is a
regional
organization
but is it a
regional
organization
with respect
to Burundi?
Deputy
Spokesman:
That is
question for
the European
Union, not for
me.
ICP:
Have you been
contacted I
guess is my
question?
Deputy
Spokesman:
But regarding
this, we have
been in touch
with a variety
of regional
bodies
including
through the
office of the
Special Envoy
for the Great
Lakes Region
but also
through our
Department of
Political
Affairs and
will keep
appraised of
all the
various actors
in this.
Back on
October 20,
Ban's deputy
spokesperson
Haq cited back
to a written
statement by
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon more
than a week
ago; he said
generally that
MONUSCO like
all UN mission
affirms the
right of
freedom of the
press. Really?
Later
on October 20
after Inner
City Press
asked UN
rapporteur on
torture Juan
Mendez about
Guantanamo and
US prisons, in
the hall after
waiting
through a
number of
questions in
Spanish Inner
City Press
asked him if
he'd received
complaints
about, or
acted on,
Burundi. No,
he said, not
yet. Really?
Update: later
on October 20
it was
announced that
the UN's Jeff
Feltman will
briefing the
Security
Council behind
closed doors
on October 21.
But what
outcome with
the Council's
penholder,
France, even
ask for?
On
October 16
Inner City
Press asked
Haq if the UN
thinks the
government can
investigate
itself. This
was based on
UN Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
October 15
statement that
"The
Secretary-General
condemns the
killing of
nine civilians
and two police
officers in
Bujumbura on
13 October...
He urges
Burundian
authorities to
undertake a
rigorous and
prompt
investigation
into the
circumstances
and motives
behind these
despicable
crimes in
order to
ensure that
their
perpetrators
are brought to
justice."
So can
the Nkurunziza
government
investigate
itself (as the
UN purports to
be
investigating
or "auditing"
itself in the
wake of
corruption
revelation
about former
Presidnet of
the General
Assembly John
Ashe among
others)? Inner
City Press
asked this
question (video
here) as
well as
following up
on
this, from
October 13:
Inner City
Press: the
Burundi
question is
one that maybe
you can check
with DPKO
[Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations].
Burundian
human rights
activists say
that an
officer,
Jerome
Ntibogora,
N-t-i-b-o-g-o-r-a,
who was
accused of
being involved
in killing
people in a…
in a hospital
after they
fled from the
Government,
has now been
deployed to
MINUSMA
[United
Nations
Multidimensional
Integrated
Stabilization
Mission] in
Mali. So
I wanted to…
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Let's see what
we can find
out.
Dujarric did
not come back
with an
answer, by
this deputy
when Inner
City Pres
asked again on
October 16
said he,
Ntibogora is
not being
deployed.
We'll see -
watch this
site.
Amid
crackdowns in
Burundi by
security
forces, and
allegations of
sexual abuse
by Burundian
peacekeepers
serving under
the UN flag,
UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous on
October 1 held
a meeting with
Burundian Vice
President
Joseph Butore.
Inner
City Press has
already tweeted
a photograph
of the
meeting, but
has now
received the
complete UN
read-out,
which raises
more questions
about Ladsous.
On the
crackdown,
Ladsous
assured Butore
that he has a
“pragmatic
approach” and
is of no mind
to question
what happens
in any
country, does
not involve
himself in
"domestic
affairs."
On the sexual
abuse
allegations,
Ladsous spoke
only in
platitudes,
without
requiring or
even inquiring
into any
actions taken
by the
Burundians on
the alleged
abuse.
Even though
Burundi was
already given
a “grace
period” to
bring
appropriate
equipment into
the Central
African
Republic for
the MINUSCA
mission, they
have not done
so. In the
meeting,
according to
the read-out,
Butore
"acknowledged"
the
substandard
equipment.
Butore
requested, and
Ladsous for
now granted,
yet another
extension to
bring the
requirement
equipment --
until March
2016 for light
equipment, and
to June 2016
for heavy
equipment.