On
Burundi, ICP
Asks Lithuania
of Attacks on
Press, Is Told
To Ask
Penholder,
France
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, May
27 -- Two
weeks after
the UN
Security
Council, the United States
and the UN
Peacebuilding
Configuration
on Burundi on
May 15 issued
statements
urging calm in
the country
given the
return of
Pierre
Nkurunziza to
presumably run
for a third
term, on May
27 the UN
Security
Council got a
closed-door
briefing from
envoy Said
Djinnit.
Later on May
27 Inner City
Press asked
the May
presidency of
the Security
Council,
Lithuania's
Foreign
Minister Linas
Linkevicius
and Permanent
Representative
Raimonda
Murmokaité
about the
closed door
briefing, and
why attacks on
journalists in
Burundi wasn't
mentioned in
the Council's
most recent
Press
Statement on
Burundi. Video
here and
embedded
below.
Raimonda
Murmokaité
provided a
second summary
of the
meeting, and
told Inner
City Press
that it surely
knew how
Council press
statements
work. (A
corresponent
in the front
row, already
called on,
appeared to
giggle.)
Inner City
Press replied
that yes, it
does know how
the process
works or is
supposed to
work -- so,
was language
about press
freedom
proposed and
rejected? Or
never
proposed?
Raimonda
Murmokaité
replied, Ask
the penholder.
That is
France, and
Inner City
Press did ask,
see below.
An
hour before
Djinnit's
briefing,
Inner City
Press asked UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric,
transcript
here, video here:
Inner
City Press: On
Burundi, I'd
wanted to ask
you
this.
The… in
today's debate
in the
Council, a
number of the
Council
members
brought up the
crackdown on
media in
Burundi
alongside the,
obviously,
attacks on
opposition and
protesters,
including the
closing of
three radio
stations, the
seeming
shooting of a
radio station
reporter along
with the
opposition
leader that
was
killed.
I wanted to
know, is the
UN doing…
given all
that's being
said in the
Security
Council
chamber today,
is the UN and
its existing
missions in
Burundi doing
anything to
actually try
to protect
journalists in
Burundi?
Spokesman:
Obviously, the
question of
protection of
journalists is
one that's
high on the
agenda and
you… as
explained by
the Deputy
Secretary-General
himself this
morning.
It is critical
for Burundi to
move
forward.
A critical
part of
Burundi moving
forward in a
peaceful way
and political
dialogue is a
free press and
that a free
press be
allowed to
operate.
So, it's
clearly part
of the overall
discussions
that are going
on.
Inner City
Press: But in
the
Secretary-General's
statement on
the attack on
the opposition
leader, was he
or DPA
[Department of
Political
Affairs] or
whoever wrote
it unaware
there was a
journalist
also gravely
wounded at the
same time?
Spokesman:
We may not
have been
aware of the
full details,
but obviously,
attacks on
journalists
are condemned.
Inner City
Press: And
just one other
question on
Burundi.
There's a lot
of discussion
there, there's
a picture, in
fact, of a
police
individual
shooting a
submachine gun
and also a
picture of him
in a
peacekeeper
uniform.
So, I wanted
to know, is
there… is DPKO
[Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations]
doing anything
to see whether
people
previously
deployed or
prospectively
deployed…
there's
another
individual
named Donat
[a/k/a
Rukonangwe] as
possibly
deploying… are
involved in a
picture of
shooting in a
crowd?
Spokesman:
I think… I
haven't
personally
seen that
picture.
If it turns
out to be
true, as we've
seen in other
cases, you
know, troop
contributors
are not
permitted to
use UN
insignia,
symbols,
emblems on
uniforms or
planes outside
of UN
peacekeeping
operation, so,
obviously, if
this turned
out to be
true, it
would… it
would be in
violation of
those
understandings.
Obviously, the
vetting
process of
peacekeepers
from all
countries goes
through… is
cooperation
between DPKO
and the Office
of the High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights
(OHCHR).
I think
there's a
special focus
if troops
would be
coming in
recently from
Burundi; at
this point,
Burundian
soldiers are
continuing to
serve in UN
peacekeeping
troops, and
obviously, we…
the UN has no
operational or
any control
over the
troops that
have returned
to the
country.
Note: the
first asked
about is
Alfred
Innocent
Museremu...
On the way
into the UNSC
for the 1:15
pm meeting, a
Permanent
member's
deputy
ambassador
told Inner
City Press
there would
probably be no
outcome from
the meeting.
And so it was
-- after an
hour and a
half, when the
Ambassador of
the Council's
"penholder" on
Burundi
Francois
Delattre
emerged, he
declined to
speak on the
UNTV camera.
He did however
to his credit
answer
questions on
the stairs
leaving the
stakeout.
Inner City
Press asked
him about the
timing of the
presidential
election; he
said the
conditions are
not met.
But why not
put that in a
Security
Council
statement? To
make it a
Council
position?
Inner City
Press asked
Delattre about
attacks on
journalists,
the Security
Council's
topic before
and after the
Burundi
consultation.
He genially
said it might
be a good idea
for the
Council to
speak on that.
We'll see -- cell phone video here, in the
spirit of
Freedom of the
Press, by the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access,
along with
this rough
transcript:
Inner
City Press:
What about the
timing of the
presidential
election?
A: There’s a
wide unity
around the
table,
conditions are
not met. A
wide unity,
everybody says
that
conditions for
election are
not met.
That’s what we
should work
on. Raising
these
conditions.
Inner City
Press: what
about attacks
on
journalists?
A:
That’s a
really good
point, because
you have these
consultations
on Burundi,
and you have
this debate on
protection of
journalists.
That’s
something that
I stressed to
my colleagues.
Protection of
journalists is
everywhere and
also in
Burundi.
Inner City
Press: Will
there be a
statement on
it?
A: You
had a
statement
already on
Sunday, you
cannot have a
statement
every day.
These are real
concerns.
Meanwhile
Inner City
Press was
multiply
informed of an
offer that had
been made to
Nkurunziza, to
ween him from
the third term
dream: a high
but honorary
post in FIFA,
the football
federation, as
a sort of
goodwill
ambassador.
Nkurunziza
turned it
down, Inner
City Press is
informed by
Permanent
Representatives
at the UN and
other
diplomatic
sources. Now
he has sacked
ministers and
said it is him
or Al Shabaab.
What could
have been,
FIFA. (Inner
City Press
also asked on
May 18 about
Qatar
detaining a
BBC journalist
while he
reported on
the situation
of migrant
workers
preparing
there for the
FIFA World
Cup.)
Inner
City Press: on
Burundi.
I wanted to
ask a couple
of
things.
One is that
there are
reports of
both military
and police
stopping
people at
checkpoints,
checking their
phones to see
if they
participated
in anti-third
term
protests.
So, I wondered
is that… does
Mr. Djinnit or
the UN have
any comment on
the alleged
crackdown on
demonstrators?
I also wanted
to know, has
the
Secretary-General
made any calls
beyond the
previously
disclosed one
to President
[Uhuru]
Kenyatta about
the situation
in
Burundi?
For example,
to Rwanda? And
finally, I
want to know
if you can
speak to
whether DPKO
[Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations]
has
facilitated
the purchase
and
acquisition of
weapons by the
Government of
Burundi for
allegedly or
reportedly for
its
peacekeeping
operations;
and if so,
what
safeguards are
in place that
those weapons
are not used
domestically?
Thank you.
Deputy
Spokesman
Farhan
Haq:
Well, on the
last one,
there are
safeguards to
make sure that
all of the
equipment used
for
peacekeeping
missions is,
in fact, used
in
peacekeeping
missions.
So, that would
a matter for
DPKO to follow
up on, but
certainly,
none of that
equipment is
meant to be
used
domestically
by any
troop-contributing
country,
including
Burundi.
In terms of
other phone
calls the
Secretary-General
made, on
Friday
afternoon, he
did also speak
with the
President of
Uganda.
And like I
said, now, Mr.
Djinnit is in
Bujumbura and
he can
continue some
of the
discussions
while he's
there.
I'm not aware
of any calls
to the
President of
Rwanda.
And you've
asked so many
questions that
I've forgotten
your first.
Inner City
Press:
As to that, in
response to
people's cell
phones being
checked to see
if they
protested, but
I just wanted
to understand
more on this
question of,
you're saying
weapons for
peacekeeping?
I mean, most
countries have
their own
military
equipment,
then they
deploy to a
country and
they get
reimbursed.
But, I’m not
aware that the
US makes… the
UN makes sure
they don't…
how they're
used in
countries.
So, I wanted
to know, very
specifically,
acquisition of
grenades in
this case,
what
safeguards are
in
place?
If a country
procures them
with the
assistance of
DPKO, do they
remain out of
the
country?
If they go
back to the
country, how
does the DPKO
have any idea
how they're
used?
Deputy
Spokesman
Haq:
DPKO follows
up on how
contingent-owned
equipment is
deployed and
used.
Now on the
first
question, if
we… if there
is a
confirmation
of this sort
of a
crackdown,
that would be
a matter of
grave
concern.
Like I said,
what we want
to make clear
is anyone
responsible
for ordering
or committing
human rights
violations
will be held
accountable
and we will
take that very
seriously.
On equipment
and materiel, UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous,
multiple
sources
exclusively
complained to
Inner City
Press, wrote a
letter urging
that Burundi's
government be
provided with
weapons,
ostensibly for
peacekeeping,
including
grenades. One
letter, they
said, was to
Montenegro.
The sources
asked Inner
City Press
what
safeguards if
any were in
place that
these grenades
and other
weapons are
not used
against
democracy
protesters in
Burundi
itself. They
noted that
Ladsous'
Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations
"let
Nkurunziza
take nine
million
dollars from
the
contingent-owned
equipment
fund," which
one called "a
variation on
Rwanda in
'94."
And
so on May 18,
Inner City
Press asked UN
deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq to
explain any
safeguards
concerning
equipment or
weapons
acquired by
Burundi for
"peacekeeping"
being used
domestically.
Inner City
Press asked,
since
countries use
their own
equipment for
overseas
deployment and
charge the UN
for it, how
does the UN
monitor how
it's used when
it returns to
the
contributing
country?
Haq insisted
that DPKO
monitors for
this.
(When Inner
City Press
asked why Ladsous
over the
weekend chided
Malians for
not being
thankful
enough to
France,
Haq told Inner
City Press to
"Ask DPKO" --
what, Ladsous
who does not
answer? His
spokespeople
who grab
microphones or
use file
folders to
block the
filming of
Ladsous?
On the
afternoon of
May 18, a well
place African
Permanent
Representative
told Inner
City Press
flatly, Ladsous
should resign.
Inner City
Press asked
Haq about
Burundian
security
forces
searching
civilians
phones for
evidence they
protested the
possible third
term. Haq said
"if that is
proved" -- if.
Haq said envoy
Said Djinnit
might briefing
the Security
Council on
Wednesday May
20, and might
brief the
press - might.
Inner City
Press asked if
Ban had called
any head of
state beyond
Kenyatta about
Burundi. Haq
said, Museveni
of Uganda.
We'll have
more on this.
Another noted
that since
Ladsous had,
as French
Deputy
Permanent
Representative
in the
Security
Council in
1994 defended
the escape
into Eastern
Congo of the
Rwanda's Hutu
genocidaires,
this push to
sell grenades
to Nkurunziza
was "not
surprising."
But why should
such an
individuals be
head of UN
Peacekeeping?
Apparently it
is up to
France and
France alone.
Others noted a
closed door
session of the
UN's budget
committee set
for next week
in which
Ladsous'
intervention
to try to
force out the
whistleblower
who revealed
French
"Sangaris"
troops' child
rapes in
Central
African
Republic would
have to be
defended, this
time by Ban
Ki-moon's
chief of staff
Susana
Malcorra.
"Why don't
they just fire
Ladsous?" one
well place
diplomat asked
Inner City
Press, then
answering the
question:
"because
France." But
for how long?
Watch this
site.
During the UN
Peacekeeping
configuration
meeting on May
15, Inner City
Press is
exclusively
informed,
Tanzania's
Ambassador
asked the UN's
head of
Political
Affairs
Jeffrey
Feltman why
the UN and
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon had
been so slow
to condemn the
coup.
Inner City
Press put the
question to
Ban's deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq at
the UN's
public noon
briefing on
May 15, to
give the UN a
change to
publicly
explain.
But as on a scandal
about Ban and
his nephew
being reported
on here by
Inner City
Press and
media in
Vietnam and
South Korea,
where Ban
Ki-moon is
headed, Haq
response was
essentially
that the UN is
good, that is
does not need
to explain (in
the case of
Ban's nephew)
or should be
presumed to be
always deeply
engaged and
deeply
concerned.
Some simply
don't believe
that.