To
Burundi, UNSC
Penholder
France Sends
Only Deputy,
"Permanent"
Scribes Barely
Report
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
January 20 --
After UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's mere
a one-line
mention of
Burundi in his
long
Priorities for
2016 speech on
January 14,
when Ban took
questions in
front of the
General
Assembly Inner
City Press
five times
began, "On
Burundi."
Inner City
Press
similarly
requested to
cover the
UNSC's trip to
Burundi. Both
were rejected.
On
January 19,
Inner City
Press asked
French
Permanent
Representative
Francois
Delattre about
UN
Peacekeeping,
led by its
fourth
Frenchman in a
row in the
person of
Herve Ladsous,
using
Burundian
troops in its
mission in
Central
African
Republic. Video here.
Delattre
replied that
it is a fair
question, but
that he would
have to get
back to Inner
City Press
with an
answer. But by
the next day,
he had not. He
is not even
going on the
trip, instead
sending his
deputy Alexis
Lamek, Vine
here.
Inner
City Press
asked the UN
which media
were being
handpicked to
"report" on
the Burundi
trip, how and
by whom, but
the UN
Spokesman refused
to say.
Now the
attendee list
has emerged,
with three (or
four,
depending on
how one
counts) media.
The UN
correspondent
of Voice of
America, as of
January 20,
had not
written a
single piece
about Burundi
in 2016 (but
had sought to
get Inner City
Press thrown
out of the UN,
document
obtained under
FOIA here.)
The Reuters
scribe, whose
bureau
chief also
engaged in
censorship,
attended but
did not at
least for two
days report on
the UN Special
Adviser
briefing the
UN served up
on January 18.
These
are the same
three media
handpicked for
previous
Security
Council trips,
picked as one
well-placed
source told
Inner City
Press to
represent the
"P3."
So
while the
majority of
states in the
UN push for
reform of the
archaic
Security
Council, an
even more
indefensible
"P3" of media
has been
allowed to coagulate
during this
era. It must
end. It must
be reformed.
The
reform will
not come from
the old UN
Correspondents
Association,
which not only
participates
in censorship
and sold seats
next to Ban
Ki-moon at
Cipriani on
Wall Street
-- the AFP
scribe is an
officer of
UNCA, now the
UN Corruption
Association,
and Reuters
has a
permanent
seat. The bare
minimum that
should be
expected of a
correspondents'
association
would be to
ask for
transparency
in such a
process. But
UNCA's big
wigs benefit
from the lack
of
transparency,
and so say
nothing, mis-serving
even most
other media at
the UN. The
head of UNCA
Giampaolo
Pioli is a dandy
landlord
(including for
example to Sri
Lanka's
ambassador)
who has yet to
ask a single
question about
Burundi.
So UNCA
does not
fight; the new Free UN Coalition for Access, founded
by two UNCA
board members
who quit in
disgust at the
corruption,
will.
The
next days in
and on Burundi
will be test,
with the
plight of the
Burundian
people
impacted also
by these
decisions
without
transparency
or
accountability.
This must end
and be
reformed; it
must and will
be exposed.
On
January 18,
while the UN
had promised a
"background"
briefing on
Burundi at
2:30 pm, no
video is
possible of
the 2:30
background
briefing on
Burundi. The
session began
with the
statement that
quotes could
only be used
if they were
approved
afterward.
(During the
"background"
briefing,
Inner City
Press for the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
asked if the
speaker could
just be
referred to a
Senior UN
Official and
dispense with
the
pre-approval
to use what
was already
said.)
Inner
City Press'
questions were
about the UN's
continued used
of Burundian
troops as
peacekeepers,
and paying the
Nkurunziza
government for
that. And now,
approved by envoy
Jamal Benomar,
these answers
to Inner City
Press:
UN Envoy Benomar
to Inner City
Press: "On the
issue of the
troops, there
are various
perspectives.
There are
those who are
calling for
these troops
to be sent
back, because
they think
government is
not
cooperating on
a number of
issues. There
are other
views, people
who say
sending back
these troops
would be a
destabilizing
factor for a
situation that
is already
very
complicated.”
“We have
Burundians
deployed in
the Central
African
Republic and
other places.
And for that
there is a
protocol in
terms of how
they are going
to be deployed
and what
criteria they
have to meet,
including
compliance
with our human
rights
policy.”
They are
appreciated;
Inner City
Press has
asked for
"clearance" of
additional
quotes. We'll
have more on
this.
Back on
January 14 of
the five
questions
picked for Ban
Ki-moon, fully
four were on
Syria; none on
Yemen much
less Burundi.
So as Ban
began walking
away from his
personal
rostrum, Inner
City Press
asked him how
his Under
Secretary
General Herve
Ladsous could
have written,
here, that
UN
Peacekeeping
is limited in
its ability to
address
significant
violence
against
civilians,
even violence
that amounts
to genocide.
The
question was
clearly
audible, but
Ban did not
answer it,
typically. Vine here. Moments later, Inner
City Press got
an answer
about Ladsous'
memo from an
Ambassador of
a Permanent
Five member of
the Security
Council. Video
here. UK
Deputy
Ambassador
Peter Wilson
said the goal
of the UNSC
trip to to
have a proper
talk with
Nkurunziza,
for a proper
dialogue and
change of
course. New
Zealand's lead
ambassador is
also going --
but Inner City
Press is not.
Earlier
in the week
when the
decision was
made for the
Security
Council trip,
Inner City
Press
immediately
replied to
Ban's
spokesperson's
office that it
was very
interesting in
going, as it
previously
covered Ban's
trip to Sri
Lanka and
Council trips
to Sudan, DR
Congo and Cote
d'Ivoire.
At 3 pm
on January 14,
Reuters'
correspondent
bragged at the
UNSC stakeout
they are
going. And at
4:30 pm, Inner
City Press got
this, from
Ban's
spokesman:
"Due to space
limitation in
the UN flight
accompanying
the Security
Council
mission to
Burundi, we
regret to
inform you
that we will
not be able to
accommodate
your request
to travel. "
So how
/ by whom is
it decided
which media
can go? Inner
City Press
asked the UN
Spokesman,
Stephane
Dujarrice, and
another, this:
"Please
describe how /
by whom the
decision on
which media
can accompany
this trip was
made, and
which media
have been
allowed to go.
Also, please
explain why
not one of the
six questions
Inner City
Press
submitted on
January 12 and
13, including
about Burundi,
were answered,
or even
acknowledged."
And
these are not
answered.
Dujarric's
office called
"lid" to end
the day. So on
January 15,
Inner City
Press asked
Dujarric in
person, video
here, transcript here:
Inner City
Press:
...Zeid's
findings.
How does this
impact on the
deployment of
Burundian
troops to UN
peacekeeping
in CAR?
And I wanted
to ask you
about the trip
the Council is
taking next
week.
Can you
describe how,
by who… who
and how the
decision was
made of which
media can
cover the
trip?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Sure.
The numbers of
seats
attributed to
media was very
limited.
A discussion
was had with
us, and a
number…
Security
Council
members, and a
list was drawn
up. Not
every
journalist can
go on every
trip. I
think if
you're talking
about
yourself, you
have traveled
with the
Secretary-General
before.
As I said, not
everyone can
go on every
trip.
Inner City
Press:
Journalists
were supposed
to cover their
own
costs.
So what does
the UN plane…
is from where
to where when
you say
there's a
limited seats?
Spokesman:
There's a UN
plane from
Addis Ababa
to, from Addis
Ababa to
Bujumbura and
back to Addis
with very
limited
numbers, which
is also
limiting the
numbers of
staff members
who can
accompany.
We wanted to
send somebody
to help mind
the
press.
We were not
able to — we
were not able
to
either.
[cross talk]
If you make
your own way
to Bujumbura,
we would be
happy to
assist you on
the ground.
We'll
have more on
this.
On January 6
UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous wrote
to the UN
Security
Council how
his Department
couldn't or
wouldn't stop
genocide, if
it were to
progress, in
Burundi. VICE
and RFI have
written on it;
Inner City
Press is
putting the
entire Ladsous
document
online here.
We'll have
more on this.
On January 11,
Inner City
Press asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
the killing
over the
weekend of
cameraman
Alfred
Baranburiya,
and what the
UN Office of
the High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights staff
in Burundi are
doing. There
was no update.
Nor on
Inner City
Press'
question about
Burundian
troops in
AMISOM in
Somalia not
getting
correctly paid
and, it's
said, being
ordered not to
use the
Internet.
Dujarric
called this
too “granular”
to answer.
Burundian
civil society
has written to
Ban seeking
the
repatriation
of the
country's
peacekeepers.
Inner City
Press has put
the letter
from Vital
Nshimirimana
to Ban online
here, and
will be asking
the UN about
it. Watch this
site.
On
January 4,
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
the threats to
peacekeepers,
the challenged
deployments to
the UN mission
in the Central
African
Republic and
reports of
rapes largely
in opposition
neighborhoods.
The UN
Spokesman had
no comment on
the rapes, or
the threats;
he said "I've
mentioned the
case of the
Lt. Colonel, I
have no
further update
from that, or
on the other
two officials
you've
mentioned....
The Secretary
General's
Special
Adviser is in
New York and I
believe you'll
probably hear
from the
Security
Council
President that
they will hear
from him at
some point in
the coming
days."
On
January 7,
with the UN
still not
having
responded on
the rapes,
Inner City
Press for the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
asked Dujarric
about a
Burundian
minister's
threat against
the RFI
journalist who
compiled the
rape report.
The minister
said, "the
authorized
government
services will
take the
necessary
measures to
deal with this
journalist’s
disruptive
activities."
Inner
City Press
read this
quote to the
UN spokesman,
who replied
the UN is
against
intimidation.
He still had
nothing on the
rapes. Video
here, transcript here.
Meanwhile
whole parts of
the UN system
say little to
nothing at
all. Last week
Inner City
Press asked
for the
comment of
Ban's
Secretariat
(UNlikely) or,
specifically,
UN Women on this cartoon
in pro-government
media.
Nothing. Total
silence.
RFI reports
in detail on
rapes in
Burundi,
particularly
in "opposition
neighborhoods."
While
government
spokespeople
-- and wannabe
government
spokespeople
-- attack the
messengers,
where is UN
Women on this?
Amid criticism
that Burundi's
Pierre
Nkurunziza
seeks only to
negotiate with
himself and
not the real
opposition to
his third
term, and of
the mediation
process as a
mere photo-op
as the UN
deploys
abusers into
its
peacekeeping
missions,
Inner City
Press on
December 28,
29, 30 and 31
asked the UN
questions. See
below for
(non) answers.
After
refusing to
comment or
even respond
to Press
questions
about
Nkurunziza's
threats
against
peacekeepers
and deployment
of alleged
human rights
abusers to UN
Peacekeeping
missions under
Herve Ladsous,
who also
refuses Press
questions,
after 4 pm on
New Year's Eve
Ban issued this.
Burundi's
Pierre
Nkurunziza
government
with the
agreement of
UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous
has undertaken
to deploy
officers
allegedly
involved in
human rights
abuses into
Ladsous'
Central
African
Republic
mission,
MINUSCA, see
below. Also
below, civil
society
statement in
advance of the
talks in
Kampala on
December 28.
Also on
Facebook (but
not Twitter),
Burundi's
Permanent
Representative
to the UN
Albert
Shingiro --
who blocks
Inner City
Press from his
Twitter feed
-- tried to mock
a protest by
follow
Burundians
which Inner
City Press covered
on December
23, here.
(Shingiro,
like the
presidential
adviser and
his
alter-ego(s)
liked to
channel Bill
Gates.) Some
diplomacy:
banning the
Press from his
statements,
mocking rather
than seeking
to dialogue
with his
countrymen. To
this has
Burundi sunk.
Back on
December 17
Inner City
Press was
told, the
third time it
asked, that
the Burundi's
Army spokesman
Gaspard
Baratuza's
deployment to
the UN mission
in CAR had
been
suspended, and
Baratuza was
being
repatriated.
UN spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, who
has shielded
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon from
such Press
questions,
said "it's an
example of the
[vetting]
policy
working."
But
Inner City
Press has
obtained the
Burundi
government
document for
the deployment
not only of
Baratuza but
other officers
in Ladsous'
MINUSCA. Today
we focus and
ask about
Major Pierre
Niyonzima.
According to
Inner City
Press'
sources,
Niyonzima not
only defended
extrajudicial
executions, he
participated
in them.
On May 14,
they say,
Major
Niyonzima was
the Senior
army officer
who led the
attack on the
hospital where
those accused
of involvement
in the
attempted coup
were
slaughtered.
They say
Niyonzima
reports to
Guillaume
Bunyoni and
has been
involved in
killings in
Musaga,
Nyakabiga and
Mutakura.
We'll have
more on this,
and on other
deployees to
Ladsous'
MINUSCA,
including
Jimmy
Rusheshe.
On December 21
Inner City
Press asked
the UN's
Deputy
Spokesperson
Farhan Haq
about these
deployments,
and the
Burundian
government's
rejection of
the African
Union's
proposed
deployment, video here, transcript
here.
On
December 16
Inner City
Press was
banned from
questions to
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon, but
learned from
the mission
MINUSCA that
Baratuza was
already in
Entebbe. Inner
City Press
asked several
Security
Council
members, then
Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric on
December17.
Dujarric told
Inner City
Press
Baratuza's
deployment is
suspended and
he is being
repatriated:
"based on the
information
we've received
regarding the
Lieutenant
Colonel, his
deployment has
been
suspended, and
he will be
repatriated
back to
Burundi." Video here. Dujarric told Inner
City Press
this shows the
UN system
working - on a
day when a
report on
rapes was
issued showing
UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous not
sufficiently
vetting for
human rights.
We'll have
more on this.
Amid the
escalating
killings in
Burundi, last
weekend's
summary
executions in
neighborhoods
opposed to
Pierre
Nkurunziza's
third term
stand out. But
Burundi Army
spokesman
Gaspard
Baratuza was
quoted on
December 12
blaming all of
the deaths on
attempts to
steal weapons
to free
prisoners.
Inner City
Press had
heard that Mr.
Baratuza was
already in the
process of
being deployed
to the UN
Peacekeeping
mission in the
Central
African
Republic
(MINUSCA) even
when he was
giving these
quotes,
issuing
statements and
speaking to
state-owned
radio, and so
asked
MINUSCA's
acting
spokesperson,
“Is Gaspard
Baratuza of
Burundi's army
getting a
MINUSCA job?”
On
December 16,
hours before
UN Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon held a
rare press
conference,
MINUSCA's
acting
spokesperson
sent this to
Inner City
Press:
"To:
Matthew.Lee
[at]
InnerCityPress.com
From: Vladimir
MONTEIRO [at]
UN.org
Date: Wed, Dec
16, 2015
Subject: ICP
question:
Gaspard
Baratuza of
Burundi's army
getting a
MINUSCA-related
post?
Cc: FUNCA [at]
funca.info
"No decision
related to Lt
Col Baratuza's
deployment can
be taken
before we
finish looking
into the
matter. We can
confirm that
Lt Col
Baratuza is in
Entebbe but he
has not yet
deployed to
MINUSCA.
Regards. VNM"
There are some
questions
about
Baratuza, a
Colonel in
Burundi's
Army, being
listed by the
UN as “Lt.
Col.”
Despite
multiple
follow-up
questions by
Inner City
Press, Mr.
Monteiro -
previously a
spokesperson
for the UN
electoral
mission in
Burundi -
replied that
“This is what
we can say
about this
issue.”
But the UN
should have to
say more.
Inner City
Press has
repeatedly
asked the UN
how its
Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations
under Herve
Ladsous vets
those who
deploy to UN
missions;
Inner City
Press exclusively
reported
on an October
1, 2015
meeting in
which Ladsous
told Burundi's
Vice President
Joseph Butare
that he is
“pragmatic” on
human rights.
Ban
Ki-moon and
his spokesman
declined to
take Inner
City Press'
questions on
December 16,
as they did on
December 14. Vine here. But concerned
members of the
UN Security
Council have
now been asked
about Baratuza
by Inner City
Press. Watch
this site. Follow @innercitypressFollow @FUNCA_info