Children in
Myanmar Are Political Football, UNICEF Has No Answer, Rohingya
Ignored
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED
NATIONS,
May 10, updated May 11 --
While Myanmar wants off the UN's children and armed
conflict list and the UN strangely praises them, three
non-governmental organizations last week said that big problems
remain, and spoke of Thai and Myanmar pressure on UNICEF to stay off
of their border. Inner City Press asked about this pressure, and
passed on to UNICEF the quote. Video here,
from Minute 25:35.
UNICEF's
spokesman on May 6 said he would get an answer. The next day, he
said that "both the Thai and Myanmar reps are en
route from a meeting and so I have no answers yet but hope to by
tomorrow. Just wanted you to know we have not forgotten your questions."
Five days later, there is nothing. Children are the
future, but in terms of explaining how it deals with pressure from
repressive governments like Myanmar's, UNICEF is no better than its
UN brethren.
This is a
problem or conundrum of the UN. Charged with defending children, it
has to work with governments. So even the biggest recruiter of child
soldiers in the world, Myanmar, gets treated with respect. The UN's
expert on the problem praised the government last week. UNICEF
promises a response, but provided none.
UNICEF's director, answer on NGO's
allegation of Myanmar and Thai pressure not shown
The NGOs were better. Watchlist had the courage to criticize UNICEF.
Human Rights Watch, asked
for its position on elections, promises to revert to Inner City Press
with an answer and did, that the 2010 elections have no promise of
effecting real democratic change inside Burma. This process is a
clearly orchestrated process to ensure continued military rule with a
civilian facade, the 2008 constitution ensures that. There is no
possibility under present conditions that these elections can promise
a more open Burma, or be in any measure a free expression of what
people inside Burma want.
Still, and this
is telling, neither group had an answer on the problem of Rohingya,
the multiply oppressed Muslims of Myanmar. The UN's envoy Ibrahim
Gambari had said it is beyond his mandate. Watch List said, we can
get that (info) to you, but has not followed up. Video here,
from
Minute 30:28. A group that is ignored not only by the UN, but even
NGOs, is suffering indeed. We will continue on this issue -- watch
this site.
Update of May 11
-- after the publication of the article above, five days after the
critique was made and question asked, the following arrived from
UNICEF, which we publish in full:
Subj:
Answer
From:
UNICEF
To:
Inner City Press
Sent:
5/11/2009
I
have received a response from my colleagues in Myanmar, and they
advise that UNICEF Myanmar Field Offices covers all parts of the
country including the border area. Children from the border area
included in the 1612 reporting as well as ILO mechanism to monitor
forced labour which includes underage recruitment. The present UNICEF
coverage in Myanmar is considered adequate and there is no immediate
plan to beef up presence.
That's not what Watchlist on Children and Armed
Conflict and Human Rights Watch say...
Update
of May 11,
6 p.m. -- while Watchlist answered the questions in real-time, it has
provided the appreciated information below about the Rohingya, in
response to the article above:
Subj:
Follow up from Watchlist on Children and Armed Conflict
From:
watchlist.org
To:
Inner City Press
Sent:
5/11/2009 5:13:29 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
Thank
you for covering the launch of our report and sorry for not getting
back earlier to you on the question of the Rohingya... In general, as
we clarify in our methodology (p. ii), our report mainly focuses on
the impact of armed conflict on children in Myanmar following our
core mandate. In contrast, the situation of the Rohingya is mainly
one of discrimination and neglect as a result of exclusion and
discrimination by the Myanmar authorities on the basis of their
ethnicity and religion. The Rohingya live under appalling
circumstances as the Myanmar authorities deny them citizenship in
their own country.
To
alert to the dire needs of the Rohingya, we also further elaborated
on their situation in our chapter on Refugees (p. 21):
Refugees
in Bangladesh
Ethnic
discrimination and religious persecution has caused 250,000 Muslim
Rohingya to flee to Bangladesh since the early 1990s. Since 1982, the
ruling authorities in Myanmar have refused to accept the Rohingya as
Burmese citizens, turning them into stateless people in their own
country, according to RI, “Rohingya: Discrimination in Burma and
Denial of Rights in Bangladesh,” July 21, 2006. [The 1982 Myanmar
Citizenship Law has had the effect of rendering the Rohingya
stateless. Their status as citizens had already been downgraded under
the 1974 Constitution.] Many are denied basic rights to freely move,
work or marry without an official permission. At the same time, SPDC
officials have exploited refugees for forced labor during the day and
forced sentry duty at night without any form of compensation,
according to RI.
While
most of the Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh have been forcibly
repatriated to Myanmar, many returned to Bangladesh because the
situation in Myanmar was not safe for them. Approximately 26,300
Rohingyas still live in two camps in the southern Cox’s Bazar area,
according to the USCRI, World Refugee Survey 2008 – Bangladesh,
June 19, 2008. An additional 100,000 to 200,000 live as unregistered
refugees outside the camp areas, according to the same source. Since
2006, the Government of Bangladesh has allowed UNHCR to construct new
shelters for refugees in both camps and allow other UN agencies and
NGOs to run programs in the refugee camps. In addition, a very small
number of Rohingya refugees have been able to resettle to a third
country.
We will continue
to follow these issues, click here
for today's coverage of the
bloodbath in Sri Lanka and the UN
Security Council's inaction, the
Secretary
General's delayed trip.
Click here
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|