On
Cameroon Dutch
and HRW
Overplay UK
Pres Vague
Line on
Violence As
Guterres Bans
Press
By
Matthew
Russell Lee, 30/7 CJR,
19/6
Video, Filing
UNITED NATIONS
GATE, August 10 – As the
Cameroon
government of
36 year
President
Paul
Biya
slaughters
civilians in
the Anglophone
regions as well as in
the North, it
has
re-engaged Washington
lobbying firm
Patton Boggs,
on a retainer
of $100,000 per
quarter
plus
expenses, documents
show.
Now on August
10, with Inner
City Press
banned from
entering the
UN for the
38th day by UN
Secretary
General Antonio
Guterres, the
Dutch
Mission to
the UN
and HRW
started
bragging about
a UN
Security Council
Presidential
Statement
which they
said embodied
deep concern. At first
banned
Inner City
Press, thanks
to Guterres
who took Biya's
golden statue
in
October 2017,
couldn't even
see the Statement:
it was not on
the Security
Council's
website
now run
by the (Dutch)
husband of
the chief of
staff of the UN
Department of
Political
Affairs'
Rosemary DiCarlo,
and was not
emailed out to
those not
(allowed) in
the UN. But by
mid afternoon
it came out: and it was
just a single
line, about
the "worrying
increase in violence
in the
north-west and
south-west
regions of
Cameroon." Why did
Human Rights
Watch make so
much of this,
after earlier
this year
telling
Inner City
Press - before
Antonio
"Golden
Statue" Guterres
banned it from
the UN - that
HRW omitted
Cameroon
from its 2018
World Report because it
didn't view it
as a top-90 problem? That's
here.
As Guterres
and his Alison
Smale and their stooges
try to keep
Inner City Press
out even
longer, we'll
have more on
this. After
twice asking
the Spokespeople
for UN
Secretary
General
Antonio
Guterres (from
the bus stop
outside the
UN Delegates'
Entrance since
Guterres
has banned
Inner City
Press since
July 3), UN Deputy
Spokesman
Farhan Haq on
August 8
belatedly told
Inner City
Press, "On
your first
question, we
can confirm
that, on 11
July, a
high-level
Cameroonian
delegation was
dispatched to
UNHQ to brief
the
Secretary-General
on the efforts
carried out by
the Government
to address the
crisis in the
North-West and
South-West
regions. The
Secretary-General
stressed the
importance of
finding a
peaceful
resolution to
the crisis
through an
inclusive
dialogue and
reiterated the
UN’s readiness
to support
such efforts,
including the
provision of
humanitarian
assistance to
the affected
regions." But
Inner City
Press'
question was,
"On Cameroon
beyond the
questions you
have left
unanswered
from August 3
and August
6-1, please
state if
anyone in the
UN Secretariat
met with a
Cameroonian
government
delegation in
the US from
July 11 (whcn
they met UK
Ambassador
Pierce) to
July 20 and if
the UN was
aware that
this Biya
delegation's
lobbying trip
was stage
managed by the
DC-based
lobbying firm
Patton Boggs."
No answer on
this, nor on
August 10,
when Guterres'
Deputy Spokesman Haq
answered a past
question from
August 6,
on using and
paying for
Biya's troops:
"Regarding
your earlier
Cameroon
question,
here’s what we
have for you: "August
6-1: On
Cameroon,
important and
not answered -
please
immediately
confirm and
explain: “A
295-strong
Cameroonian
contingent
including four
doctors, will
be deployed in
the
intervening
weeks to the
Central
African
Republic
(CAR).They
will be part
of the United
Nations
Multidimensional
Integrated
Mission for
the
Stabilization
of CAR
(MINUSCA),
ministry of
Defense
sources in
Cameroon
disclosed on
Thursday.”
Given not only
this
military's
torching of
villages in
the Anglophone
areas but
summary
executions,
why is the UN
accepting this
deployment at
this time? How
much of the
money goes to
/ stays with
the Biya
government?
What vetting
has been done?
Does the UN
know the
identity of
the Cameroon
soldiers
recently shown
killing women
and children?
What assurance
does the UN
have these
soldiers will
not “serve”
the UN in
CAR?"
The 295-strong
Cameroonian
contingent
referred into
in the article
is not a new
deployment. It
is in fact a
rotation of
two
Cameroonian
Formed Police
Units (FPUs)
already
deployed in
MINUSCA.
In this
specific case,
the two
Cameroonian
FPUs will
finish their
tour of duty
by
mid-September,
will
substitute
them. As per
established
procedures,
all FPU
personnel
undergo
extensive
pre-deployment
training to
ensure they
understand the
rules,
regulations
and, standards
and values
expected of
personnel
deployed to UN
operations,
including
respect for
human rights.
With regard to
the vetting
process, the
Policy on
Human Rights
Screening of
United Nations
Personnel
places primary
responsibility
on Member
States to
ensure that
the personnel
they appoint
for deployment
have not been
involved in
violations.
All countries
contributing
uniformed
personnel to
UN
peacekeeping
operations
have primary
responsibility
for screening
individuals
and for
ensuring that
personnel they
nominate for
service have
not been
involved, by
act or
omission, in
violations of
international
humanitarian
law or human
rights law,
and have not
been
repatriated on
disciplinary
grounds from a
UN operation.
Contributing
countries have
to provide a
certification
to that effect
when they
nominate
personnel for
deployment.
The Policy
thus sets
forth
procedures to
strengthen the
ability of the
United Nations
to ensure that
its personnel
meet the
highest
standards of
efficiency,
competence and
integrity, and
to promote and
encourage
respect for
human rights,
in accordance
with the
United Nations
Charter. These
procedures
have notably
led to
strengthen
pre-deployment
screening and
certification
by
contributing
countries.
On your
question
regarding
payment,
countries
contributing
uniformed
personnel to
peacekeeping
operations are
reimbursed by
the UN at a
standard rate,
approved by
the General
Assembly, of
US$1,428 per
person per
month."
After
Guterres remained disturbingly
quiet
about Biya's
killing for a
full year, when Cameroon
was the chair
of the Budget
Committee
whose support
Guterres
wanted for his
proposal like
moving jobs
from Geneva to
Budapest,
New York to
Mexico City,
Entebbe to
Kenya? We'll
have more on
this. This
also means that the
July 11
meeting with Cameroonian
ministers
bragged about
by this
month's UN
Security
Council
president,
Karen Pierce of
the UK, was
actually in
connection
with a
lobbying trip
stage
managed by
Patton Boggs.
Inner City Press has
asked the
UK Mission,
see below,
and also on
the morning of
August 7
asked
Secretary
General Antonio
Guterres'
deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq
before "his"
noon
briefing Inner
City Press
was banned
from for the
35th day in a
row. Guterres'
Haq never
answered
(though perhaps
relatedly
envoy Francois
Fall is
supposedly
going to
Cameroon). Now
Inner City
Press has
reviewed
Patton Boggs
long history
with Paul
Biya, as he
has become
more and more
brutal. It
began in 2004
with a letter
from Patton
Boggs' Joseph
Brand (still
involved in
2018) to Biya's
Pierre Moukoko
Mbonjo
for Peter
Mafany
Musonge, here.
We'll
have more on
this. UNanswered
as of August8
by Guterres'
team: "August
7-1: On
Cameroon
beyond the
questions you
have left
unanswered
from August 3
and August
6-1, please
state if
anyone in the
UN Secretariat
met with a
Cameroonian
government
delegation in
the US from
July 11 (whcn
they met UK
Ambassador
Pierce) to
July 20 and if
the UN was
aware that
this Biya
delegation's
lobbying trip
was stage
managed by the
DC-based
lobbying firm
Patton Boggs."
Neither Haq
nor the others
in Guterres'
team whom
Inner City Press
asked - Deputy SG
Amina J. Mohammed,
Eihab
Omaish, Alison
Smale and her
officer in
charge (of
censorship)
Hua Jiang
answered that
specific
question.
Instead Haq at the
briefing said
he trying
to "get
language"
about Guterres'
envoy Francois
Lounseny
Fall, who
equated secessionists
with extremists,
may go to the
country this
week. What,
some ask, for
Patton Boggs?
Inner City Press
asked the UK
Mission's two
spokespeople
Matthew Moody
and
Amy.Quantrill: "Good
morning. This
is a formal
Press request
for an answer
I have sought
from the UK
Mission to the
UN since
August 1. On
July 31
Ambassador
Pierce stated
on Twitter
that she (and
presumably
others at the
UK mission)
had met on
July 11 with
Cameroonian
ministers.
On August 1,
for the
Program of
Work press
conference I
was and am
banned from by
USG Alison
Smale and SG
Antonio
Guterres,
after being
roughed up by
UN Security
while covering
an event and a
meeting on
June 22 and
July 3, I
asked both of
you:
"Did she mean
government
ministers or
religious
ministers? If
the former,
who were they?
Which
departments?
And what was
it mean to say
“we were
watching the
situation
closely.” Does
this mean the
UK or the
Council? Is
there a role,
does the UK
think, for UN
envoy Francois
Lonseny Fall?
Or should
another
mediator be
assigned?"
I have
yet to receive
an answer,
including
after tweeting
substantial
the same
question to
Amb Allen
yesterday. Nor
did I receive
any response
to my August 3
question to
you,
explicitly
your UK's
capacity of
President of
the UNSC,
about Yemen
and a Saudi
letter.
This time I am
addressing
this to
Stephen Hickey
as well.
(Hello).
I am
requesting an
immediate
answer to
these Cameroon
questions:
Name the
ministers Amb
Pierce met
with on July
11.
State whether
Amb Pierce or
anyone else at
the UK mission
was aware this
this Biya
administration
"tour" July
11-20 was
stage managed
by DC-based
lobbying firm
Patton Boggs
(reflected on
documents
Inner City
Press has this
morning
published),
including US
ex-Amb Frank
Wisner.
State
whether any
non-Cameroonians
were present
at the July 11
meeting and if
so, who they
were.
state whether
Amb Pierce has
had any
meetings with
Cameroonian
opposition or
Federalists or
separatists,
and if not,
why not.
Also,
as I asked on
August 1 in
advance of
these week's
UNSC meeting I
remained
banned from,
Last month
Sweden said at
the beginning
of the month
that it would
be seeking
agreed Press
Elements from
every
consultation.
Will the UK be
seeking Press
Elements from
this Western
Sahara
consultation?
And if not,
why not?
On
deadline.
Thanks you in
advance.
-Matthew."
Nothing.
The
documents show
the agreement
is to run to
mid 2019,
long after
Biya's next
"election" in
October (also
made a
mockery of by
French
President
Emmanuel Macron
inviting Biya
to an event in
Paris as head
of state in November).
The
"confidential"
letter
agreement is
addressed by
Patton Boggs' Robert S.
Kapla to
Biya's Prime
Minister
Philemon Yang,
to be signed
by Ghogomu
Paul Mingo and
cites
Prof. Nkot.
It
says Joseph
Brand and "Ambassador
Frank
Wisner"
will work on
the Biya fileAfter
the abuses by
Cameroon's
security
forces have
been ignored
by the UN, as
Inner City
Press has
repeatedly
asked about
them until being
banned from
the UN on July 3
and since, new
leaked videos show
summary executions
and manhandling
of prisoners. On
July 14 and 25
Inner
City Press
raised the
issue, and
that of the
UN's censorship
to
the French
Mission to
the UN, and also
directly to
Deputy
Ambassador
Anne Gueguen.
Nothing,
from France
and from the
Security
Council as a
whole, not
even an "Any
Other
Business" briefing,
with none as
yet foreseen
under August's
Security
Council
president the
UK, whose
Liam Fox
bragged of UK
New Age's
gas deal with
Biya; Inner
City Press
asked UK
Ambassador
Karen Pierce about
it here,
before Guterres'
Security's
ouster and
ongoing ban on
which the UK
has done
nothing. July 20
video here.
After
that, Pierce said on
Twitter
- while ignoring
Inner City Press'
question as her
mission has in
recent days,
also on
Yemen - that she
had met with
Cameroon
ministers on
July 11. Inner
City Press
asked the UK
Mission in writing
on August
1 to
explain: "Amb
Pierce
disclosed in
yesterday's
Twitter
Q&A that
she “spoke to
a delegation
of Cameroon
ministers at
the UN on 11
July.” Did she
mean
government
ministers or
religious
ministers? If
the former,
who were they?
Which
departments?
And what was
it mean to say
“we were
watching the
situation
closely.” Does
this mean the
UK or the
Council? Is
there a role,
does the UK
think, for UN
envoy Francois
Lonseny Fall?
Or should
another
mediator be
assigned?"
Nothing, still
no answer as of
noon on August 6 from
the UK
Mission.
(Inner
City Press'
later on
August 6
online question
to returned-toTwitter
Deputy
Ambassador Jonathan
Allen on this
has yet to be
replied to.) Instead,
Pierce said
the initiative
is with
Biya
and his
government.
Now it
emerges that
Paul Biya sent a
delegation of
five from
July 11 to 20,
to DC and New
York to
meet members
of the UN Security
Council. This
while UNSG
Antonio
Guterres had banned
from the UN
Inner City
Press, which has ask
him for more
than a year
about the slaughter
in Cameroon and
his inaction,
as he needed the support of
the Cameroonian
chair of the
UN Budget Committee.
New filing on
Guterres and conflict
of interest, here.
We'll
have more on
this -
and this: ghoulishly
in Cameroon,
where there
is supposed to
be an election
in October,
French
Ambassador
Gilles
Thibault, of
whom Inner City
Press has
asked French
Permanent
Representative
Francois
Delattre
before being
banned from
the UN since
July 3,
has invited
Paul Biya to an Emmanual
Macron "Peace" event, as
Cameroonian
head of
state.. in
November. We'll
have more on
this. On
August
1 in a
briefing Inner
City Press was
banned from
Pierce said
the initiative is
with the
President and
government of
Cameron - that
is, 36 year
ruler Paul
Biya. On
August
2 Inner
City Press emailed
Guterres'
spokesmen and
team
including Alison
Smale and
officer in
charge Hua Jiang, "On
Cameroon and
refugees from
Cameroon in
Nigeria, what
is the
comment,
response and
action if any
of the
Secretargy
General to the
deaths of
eight
Cameroonian
refugees in
Ikom, Cross
River who died
of fumes from
a generator in
their room?
What has the
SG done about
the conflict
and crisis in
the Anglophone
areas of
Cameroon since
his visit to
Younde in
October 2017?
What has he
done in the
last 12 days?"
Haq did not
email any
response back
before heading
out to lunch.
On his
way back
in, Inner City
Press
reiterated the
question and he just
walked
by, as did Hua Jiang,
schooled in
this with
UNMIS in Sudan
it seems, part
of the censorship,
minutes later.
Video here.
This is
today's UN.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2015 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|