UN
Briber China
Energy Fund
Cttee
Belatedly Challenged
in NGO Cttee
By USUN As
Guterres Stonewalls
on CEFC
By Matthew
Russell Lee, CJR PFT CEFC
Video
UNITED NATIONS
GATE, January 21 – While UN
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres was refusing
throughout 2018 to begin any
UN audit into China Energy
Fund Committee, implicated in
the UN bribery prosecution US
v Patrick Ho, Guterres had a
secret: his role
on the board of Gulbenkian
Foundation which was trying to
sell
its Partex Oil affiliate to
CEFC. See Inner City Press'
first exclusive report here.
Now while
Guterres continues to ban from
entry the Press which asked
him about his CEFC links, in
the UN Committee on
Non-Governmental Organizations
on January 21 the US belatedly
requested the suspension or
dis-accreditation of CEFC from
the UN. This is what Guterres
has refused to act on for more
than a year, while concealing
his links to the group. Inner
City Press on the morning of
January 21 wrote to Guterres,
Alison Smale and their
spokesmen: "January 21-1:
Please immediately provide the
SG's response on the request
made this morning in the UN
NGO Committee to disaccredit
China Energy Fund Committee
whose Patrick Ho was indicted
and convicted of UN bribery,
explain why SG Guterres never
even started a OIOS audit of
CEFC and why he omitted his
paid directorship in
Gulbenkian Foundation from his
UN Public Financial Disclosure
form covering 2016, and on
Gulbenkian trying to sell its
Partex Oil to CEFC China
Energy in 2018." There's been
no answer - as there have been
no answers from Guterres and
Smale and Dujarric for two
weeks despite promises to UNSR
David Kaye and on camera.
Inner City Press also wrote to
three at the US Mission to the
UN: "I noticed in the UN NGO
Committee this morning that
USUN belatedly requested a
review of China Energy Fund
Committee, whose Patrick Ho
was indicted for UN bribery,
FCPA and money laundering in
2017, convicted in
2018. This
is a Press request for a copy
of the USUN statement read out
in the NGO Committee, for the
materials reference there in
and distributed to Committee
members, and for the Mission's
/ Amb Cohen's and Amb.
Currie's comment on it, why it
took so long, and on UNSG
Antonio Guterres having not
disclosed his paid
directorship of Gulbenkian
Foundation in his UN Public
Financial Disclosure form
covering 2016 and refusal to
start any OIOS audit of CEFC,
which was trying to buy Partex
Oil and Gas from Gulbenkian in
2018.
Also, on Guterres and Alison
Smale's ongoing ban on
US-based investigative Inner
City Press even entering the
UN, without hearing or appeal,
see 2 January 2019 Kaska-eque
denial of accreditation,
below." USUN Spokesperson John
Degory responded, so far, with
the text of Deputy Rep to ECOSOC
Courtney Nemroff's remarks
including: "Last week, we sent
a Diplomatic Note to the
Committee’s outgoing Chair and
to all members of this
Committee with our request
that this Committee recommend
withdrawing the ESOCOC special
consultative status of the NGO
China Energy Fund Committee,
or CEFC, which was granted in
2011. This request was
carefully considered and is
being made in the first
session of this Committee
following the conviction of an
individual in U.S. federal
court on serious criminal
charges relating to his use of
the organization as a platform
for criminal activity, the
details of which are provided
in the Diplomatic Note. It is
a shame to see an NGO subvert
and manipulate its ECOSOC
accreditation in this manner,
so it is with deep
disappointment that we bring
this situation to the
attention of the Committee
today. We are making this
request before the full
Committee in the full interest
in due diligence,
transparency, and openness. We
believe it is important that
the Committee carry out its
responsibility to protect and
ensure the continued integrity
of the ECOSOC accreditation
process by taking prompt
action to address this
case. CEFC is registered
in both Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region of the
People’s Republic of China and
in the State of Virginia in
the United States as a
not-for-profit or charitable
organization. CEFC received
ECOSOC special consultative
status in 2011. On
December 5, 2018, a jury in a
Manhattan federal court found
Chi Ping Patrick Ho, CEFC’s
Deputy Chairman and Secretary
General, guilty of taking part
in a multi-year,
multimillion-dollar scheme to
bribe foreign leaders in
exchange for business
advantages for CEFC China
Energy a Shanghai-based
corporate entity that was the
primary financial benefactor
of the CEFC. Mr. Ho was
convicted of violations of the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,
international money
laundering, and conspiracy to
commit both. According to
court documents and evidence
presented at trial, he
utilized CEFC’s ECOSOC special
consultative status to access
UN resources and people and
advance commercial goals,
including through bribery
schemes. We also have been
unable to document any
activity by this organization
out of its Virginia-based
location since Mr. Ho’s arrest
in 2016, and note that it has
not filed the requisite tax
documents required of
not-for-profit organizations
in the United States since
that date. We have provided
all NGO Committee members with
further details on the case,
including a press release from
the U.S. Department of Justice
on the conviction, and are
prepared to provide member
states with any additional
information they may
require. ECOSOC
resolution 1996/31 governs the
process for ECOSOC
consultative status. Article
57(a) of 1996/31 stipulates
that the consultative status
of non-governmental
organizations shall be
suspended up to three years or
withdrawn “if an organization,
either directly or through its
affiliates or representatives
acting on its behalf, clearly
abuses its status by engaging
in a pattern of acts contrary
to the purposes and principles
of the Charter of the United
Nations.” Article 57(b)
of 1996/31 further stipulates
that consultative status be
suspended up to three years or
withdrawn “if there exists
substantiated evidence of
influence from proceeds
resulting from internationally
recognized criminal activities
such as the illicit drugs
trade, money-laundering or the
illegal arms trade.” In
view of the conviction of Mr.
Ho on money laundering charges
and the use of the
organization for criminal
activity and bribery
activities that involved the
use of the organization’s
consultative status and other
organizational resources, the
United States has determined
that a request to withdraw
consultative status in
accordance with Article 57 of
ECOSOC resolution 1996/31 is
appropriate and necessary. We
believe the Committee has a
responsibility to ensure that
ECOSOC special consultative
status is not misused as a
platform for criminal
activity. We understand,
per ECOSOC resolution 1996/31,
that CEFC has the right to
respond to the request to
recommend withdrawal of its
consultative status. We
request that the Secretariat
inform CEFC of its right to
respond immediately. We
further request that if CEFC
chooses to respond, that the
Secretariat request it do so
before the tenth meeting of
this Committee on Friday,
January 25, to then allow this
Committee sufficient time to
consider the U.S. request
further. We also remain
prepared to provide additional
information regarding this
matter to the Secretariat, and
encourage the Committee and
the Secretariat to handle all
proceedings in this case as
openly and transparently as
possible." But will the US
administration, or if
necessary individual members
of Congress, ensure that
Guterres is held accountable
for the cover up and
proliferation of corruption
and censorship during his
tenure? CEFC has until January
25 to respond. China did not
respond in the ill-attended
Committee meeting which Inner
City Press, banned from entry
by Guterres, never the less
covered. Watch this site.
Inner City
Press continues its exclusive
series on some of the CEFC
connections in and through the
UN that should have been
identified in the audit that
Guterres corruptly refused to
begin, with his conflict of
interest. (Even his
predecessor Ban Ki-moon
ordered an audit after Ng Lap
Seng was indicted - Guterres
still hasn't after Patrick Ho
was convicted.)
One of the
people identified in the Ban
Ki-moon audit of Ng Lap Seng
and South South News was Ion
Botnaru. He was allowed to
retire, after changing a UN
General Assembly document
along with then President of
the General Assembly John
Ashe, who died under
indictment ostensibly crushed
by his own barbell, to benefit
Ng's Sun Kian Ip group.
Botnaru reappears again with
CEFC, here.
And, crying out for audit, the
President of the General
Assembly who swore in
Guterres, Peter Thomson of
Fiji, traveled like Ashe and
Vuk Jeremic and Sam Kutesa to
meet CEFC's Ye Jianming in
Hong Kong.
Inner City
Press has asked Guterres and
his spokespeople, among many
other questions, "Beyond the
37 questions from Inner City
Press you refused to answer
last week, still set forth
below for promised answer,
this is a request, given that
Peter Thomson is the SG's rep
on Oceans that you describe in
detail Thomson's 2017 meeting
with now disappeared Ye
Jianming of CEFC, name which
UN DSS officials were with him
and what reports they filed,
what their duties were; what
was seen by those accompanying
Thomson, at least two of whom
are still in the UN (one is
with China)."
Typically,
Guterres and his spokespeople
did not answer. So here,
pending listing those from UN
Department of Safety and
Security the group which
roughs up the Press without
accountability and maintains a
retaliatory "lifetime" banned
from the UN list, are the
names: "During his two-day
visit, the President of the UN
General Assembly was
accompanied by his senior
advisors Abdelghani Merabet,
and Zhang Yi, as well as by
the UN Department of Economic
and Social Affairs’s Director
of the Division for
Sustainable Development, Zhu
Juwang." Now, Thomson staffer
or embed Zhang Yi has gone
(back, or more openly) to working
for the Chinese government:
"On August 14 [2018], Deputy
Director-General of China
International Center for
Economic and Technical
Exchanges Zhang Yi was invited
to attend the FOCAC -
Africa-China Poverty Reduction
and Development Conference, an
important sub-forum under the
FOCAC hosted by the State
Council Leading Group Office
of Poverty Alleviation and
Development and co-organized
by the International Poverty
Reduction Center in China and
the China Belt and Road
Institute for Agricultural
Cooperation of China
Agriculture University.
Attending were more than 300
participants including
government officials,
international organizations’
representatives,
non-governmental
organizations’ officials,
business leaders, experts and
scholars from China, United
States, Japan, Denmark and 40
African countries like Angola,
Botswana and Mauritius."
What did
they see during Thomson's
meeting with now-known briber
Ye Jianming? Zhu Juwang
is still with UN DESA;
Abdelghani Merabet is
with the current PGA. We'll
have more on this: the UN
should be answering these
questions, now.
In 2017,
the year in which CEFC's
Patrick Ho was indicted and
arrested for UN bribery, CEFC
in the UN engaged at least
twice with Lenni Montiel,
including for example on 6
July 2017, and also with DESA
official Pingfan Hong. Some
photos here.
Inner City Press before
Guterres had it roughed up and
banned now 176 days for its
inquiries into Guterres'
corruption has politely
questioned both Montiel and
Hong - but Guterres has made
that impossible and his
Spokesmen refused to answer
any written questions, for
more than a week now. There
are more connections.
Guterres
got favors from Peter Thomson
when Thomson was President of
the General Assembly.
Rudimentary open source
research - including on the
UN's own website here - finds
that Thomson, like implicated
Sam Kutesa and John Ashe and
Vuk Jeremic, visited CEFC's Ye
Jianming in Hong Kong. What
was discussed? Inner City
Press previously covered,
critically but civilly,
Thomson. Now corrupt Guterres
has had Inner City Press
roughed up and banned 175
days, with his Spokesman
Stephane Dujarric refusing to
answer any questions despite
the promise of Guterres' USG
Alison Smale.
After receiving favors from
Thomson as PGA, Guterres gave
him a job in his Secretariat,
Representative on Oceans. Here
is Patrick Ho, interviewed by
Guterres' DESA, on Oceans.
There should have been an
audit. There still should be.
Another of Guterres' special
advisers, Jeffrey Sachs, after
denying Inner City Press'
documented report Sachs was on
a UN - CEFC board, abruptly
closed his Twitter account,
story here.
Guterres goes on robo-tweeting
from parts unknown, spending
public money undisclosed.
Guterres should explain and /
or resign. We will have
more in this series.
A
now-removed
Gulbenkian Foundation web page
says Guterres continued as a
board member into 2018. Archived
here.
In
fact it was on 9 February 2018
that Gulbenian tweeted
that Guterres was no longer on
the board - AFTER it was
reported that Gulbenian was
trying to sell, or even had
already sold, Partex to CEFC.
This is called guilty
knowledge.
While
Guterres' spokesman Stephane
Dujarric is refusing to answer
Inner City Press' written
questions, contrary to
promises by Guterres' Global
Communicator Alison Smale, it
appears Guterres' evasive
defense is claiming that he
left Gulbenkian in November
2016 and therefore somehow had
no conflict of interest in
refusing and blocking the
obviously needed UN audit of
CEFC after the arrest of its
Patrick Ho for UN bribery.
This defense is dubious.
Why did
Gulbenkian take
down its webpage
disclosing that Guterres
remained on board into 2018?
Why - sixteen months after
Guterres ostensibly left - did
they wait until February 2018
to tweet
that he left? Because their
negotiations with CEFC became
public (see 2 February 2018
Bloomberg here,
and 6 February MacauHub here:
"CEFC China Energy buys
Portugal’s Partex Oil &
Gas.")
In any
event, Guterres' "2017"
Financial Disclosure, which
explicitly says it covered the
year 2016 in which even in
this new story he remained on
Gulbenkian's board into
November, more than 80% of the
year - did not disclose his
role in Gulbenkian, only on
the Club of Madrid. Guterres
has had previous financial
disclosure omissions, for
example in Portugal, here.
CEFC was hardly unknown: it
bought a Portuguese insurance
company in November 2017, here.
Guterres' failure to disclose
and, separately and even more
so, his refusal to audit CEFC
in the UN was a direct
conflict of interest, which he
has tried to cover up by
roughing up and banning Inner
City Press which asked him
about it. (See January 2018
press conference here,
July 2018 roughing up by
Guterres' UN Security here,
banning letter via Press
Freedom Tracker here.)
Three times now
Dujarric, his deputy Farhan
Haq and Office of the
Spokesperson colleagues Marcia
Soares Pinto
and Keishamaza
Rukikaire, as
well as
Guterres, his
chief of staff
Maria Luiza
Ribeiro Viotti
and Deputy SG
Amina J.
Mohammed have
refused to
answer this:
"Beyond the 36
questions from
Inner City
Press you
refused to
answer last
week, still
set forth
below for
promised
answer, this
is a
reiterated
request past
deadline that
you (1) state
when SG
Guterres left
his position
on the
Gulbenkian
Foundation,
(2) state why
Gulbenkian was
not listed on
SG Guterres'
public
financial
disclosure
which covered
2016; (3)
explain how it
is not a
conflict of
interest for
SG Guterres to
have refused
to start an
audit of CEFC
in the UN, as
requested by
Inner City
Press in
January 2018,
given CEFC's
bid for the
oil business
of Gulbenkian.
Also, again,
state why
under SG
Guterres there
have been no
updates to the
UN public
financial
disclosures
since those
filed for
2016. Also,
again, explain
your refusal
to answer any
of Inner City
Press'
questions this
week despite
USG Smale's
statements to
GAP, me and UNSR
David Kaye."
No response at
all, even as
spokesman
Dujarric for
example tweets
at actor Seth
Rogin.
Dujarric, as
simply
one example, on 1 March
2018 evaded
Inner City
Press'
in-person
questions
about CEFC and
Guterres, less
than a month
after Gulbenkian said
Guterres was
off the board,
amid oil negotiations
with CEFC. Video
here.
Then
Guterres and
Dujarric had
Inner City
Press roughed
up and banned
from the UN. Guterres'
wife Catarina
Vaz Pinto also
worked for Gulbenkian. This
is today's
corrupt UN.
For
years Guterres received money
as a board member of the
Calouste Galbenkian
Foundation, which despite its
name is the 100% owner of
Partex Oil and Gas. Partex
has operations in Angola, Abu
Dhabi, Brazil, Kazakhstan, the
Netherlands, Oman and
Portugal. It was to a
Portuguese court that
Guterres, while justifying
no listing some of his income,
disclosed in 2016 that he was
paid at least € 2735 per month
for his position with the
Gulbenkian Foundation.
But
while a now deleted Foundation
web page (archived here)
stated that Guterres continued
with Gulbenkian into 2018,
Guterres did not list it on
his most
recent, and so far lone,
UN Public Financial
Disclosure, which covered 2016
("Disclosing financial and
other interests for the 2016
reporting year").
So why did
Guterres disclose his position
with the Club of Madrid, but not
with the Gulbenkian Foundation
/ Partex Oil and Gas? It is
worth noting that Guterres'
wife Catarina Vaz Pinto has
also been connected
to Gulbenkian.
Following the roughing up and
banning from the UN of Inner
City Press which has covered
the CEFC scandal throughout,
Guterres' head of Global
Communications Alison Smale promised
UN Special Rapporteur for
Freedom of Expression David
Kaye, who asked,
that the UN would still answer
Inner City Press' written
questions.
But
as 2018 came to a close
Guterres' spokesmen Stephane
Dujarric and Farhan Haq left
unanswered 36 questions in a
row from Inner City Press,
including this: “Beyond the 35
questions from Inner City
Press you refused to answer
this week, this is a request
on deadline that you (1) state
when SG Guterres left his
position on the Gulbenkian
Foundation,
(2) state why
Gulbenkian was not listed on
SG Guterres' public financial
disclosure which covered 2016;
(3) explain how
it is not a conflict of
interest for SG Guterres to
have refused to start an audit
of CEFC in the UN, as
requested by Inner City Press
in January 2018, given CEFC's
bid for the oil business of
Gulbenkian.
Also, again,
state why under SG Guterres
there have been no updates to
the UN public financial
disclosures since those filed
for 2016. Also, again, explain
your refusal to answer any of
Inner City Press' questions
this week despite USG Smale's
statements to GAP, me and UNSR
David Kaye. On deadline.”
The
question was also sent to the
e-mail addresses of Guterres,
his chief of staff Maria Luiza
Ribeiro Viotti, his Deputy
Amina J. Mohammed, and Smale,
who earlier in the week told
Inner City Press she would
take “under advisement” her 17
August 2018 pretextual
withdrawal of Inner City Press
decade long UN media
accreditation.
It seems clear that
Guterres and his team have
engaged in censorship for
corruption, to conceal a
blatant conflict of interest
by Guterres. It has been
raised by Inner City Press to
the UN Office of Internal
Oversight Services, and
others. Watch this site.
Back on 5
December 2018 Patrick Ho was
found guilty of seven of eight
counts of violating the US
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
and month laundering. (He was
only not guilty on money
laundering in Chad - where the
bribe was not through any US
bank but in cash, $2 million
in a gift box). The evidence
showed that the NGO he ran,
China Energy Fund Committee,
used its ongoing UN
consultative status to pay
bribes to Ugandan foreign
minister - and Ashe's
successor as President of the
UN General Assembly -- Sam
Kutesa.. He was working
with precedessor Vuk
Jeremic while Jeremic
was UN PGA. CEFC even offered
weapons, tanks and drones, to
Chad's long time president
Idriss Deby for oil blocks or
a stake in the Chad Cameroon
pipeline. (Inner City Press
published documents here.)
The night of the
verdict I asked UN Secretary
General Antonio Guterres what
he will do to clean up the UN,
where he has left CEFC without
any audit, still in
consultative status with the
UN. On his way from his
Mercedes to a glitzy
fundraiser including George
and Amal Clooney, Guterres refused to
answer. The next day when
asked by another journalist
why Guterres had refused to
answer banned Inner City
Press' question, his spokesman
Stephane Dujarric claimed that
the UN has “cooperated” with
the prosecution. But the
bribery group remains in the
UN, unaudited.
Why has the case
of US versus Ho, and now the
guilty verdicts, garnered
relatively so little interest,
with the corruption of the UN
exposed by it scarcely
mentioned all? SG Guterres is
hoping it goes away. In terms
of corruption, he did not
disclose and refuses to answer
on the African business links
of his son Pedro Guimarães e
Melo De Oliveira Guterres. He
refuses to answer how much he
spends in public funds flying
to his home in Lisbon
at least sixteen times sofar
as SG.
So
CEFC remains an accredited non
governmental organization with
the UN's Economic and Social
Council, while investigative
Inner City Press for which I
have been covering the case
has been dis-accredited by and
ousted from the UN, put on a
list of those permanently
banned without notice, due
process or appeal. On December
7 I was
informed I am banned
from a “UN Human Rights” event
on December 10 to be addressed
by Guterres and his human
rights commissioner Michelle
Bachelet. But this reporting
will not stop - Guterres'
corruption of the UN must be
addressed, through oversight
or as is discussed elsewhere,
impeachment. From the lofty
goals of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights to
Guterres' censorship for
corruption is UNacceptable.
With UN High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights
Michelle
Bachelet
and her Deputy Andrew Gilmour
set to speak in the UN on
human rights day on December
10, Inner City Press responded
to an invitation and was told,
"Thank you for registering to
attend the Human Rights Day
event at the United Nations on
Monday 10 December. On Monday,
please come to the UN
Visitors’ Gate on First Avenue
opposite 45th street starting
at 2pm, at which time entry
passes will be distributed."
Then, past six
p.m. on Friday, December 7 this
from Bachelet's and Gilmour's
Office of the High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights: "Dear
Matthew, We
have received
notification
from UN
Security that
your name was
flagged as
"BARRED" on
the list we
submitted for
passes for
Monday's event
(3pm, ECOSOC
Chamber). We
will therefore
not have a
pass for you
and are unable
to facilitate
entry.
Thank you for
your interest
and best
regards,
OHCHR New York
Office." Photo
of email here.
Inner City Press
immediately wrote back,
to the sender
and
Bachelet and
her assistant, to
Andrew Gilmour
and to the
moderator of
the event, "Particularly
since you are the UN Office of the
High Commissioner for *Human
Rights,* did you not ask why a
journalist who asks the Secretary
General and his spokesmen about
the killings in Cameroon,
Burundi, UN
corruption, UN peacekeepers'
sexual abuse of civilians,
and Sri
Lanka, is “BARRED” from
attending your human rights event
- without any hearing or appeal? I
will appreciate your Office's
answer to this." We'll
have more on this.
Bachelet
gave a speech on
October 15 in the UN's Third
Committee, she emphasized a
prioritization of social and
economic rights and said one
of the officials of her office
is "on mission in
Silicon Valley" in the
US. There are questions
about this - but Inner City
Press which has covered human
rights and the UN for more
than a decade was for the
first time banned from access
a High Commissioner's speech.
This has been raised repeated
to Bachelet since she took
office but she has so far done
nothing, not even responded.
Meanwhile on October 12
Cameroon, from whose Paul Biya
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres took a golden statue
and favors in the Fifth
(Budget) Committee and remains
silent on the slaughter of
Anglophones, was elected to a
seat on the UN Human Rights
Council. This system is
failing - but if Bachelet
cannot even answer on Guterres
maintaining a secret banned
list including not only Inner
City Press but also "political
activists" - and anti-corruption
campaigners -
then the UN of Guterres has
hit its
newest low.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office, past & future?: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now UNder
Guterres: UN Delegates
Entrance Gate
and mail: Dag H.
Center
Box 20047, NY NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|