Accused
China Spy NYPD Officer Gets Sept 2022
Trial Date After CIPA, UN Mission Cited
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Podcast
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
EDNY COURTHOUSE,
Sept 9 – The penetration of
the Chinese Communist Party
into New York City, not only
the nearly fully purchased
United Nations of Antonio
Guterres but even the NYPD,
became clearer on September
21, 2020. Inner City Press'
first tweet here.
On February 12,
2021, Angwang was ordered free
on bond, with no GPS location
monitoring, below.
According
to an Eastern District of New
York filing, on Inner City
Press' Document Cloud here,
NYPD Officer Angwang, an
ethnic Tibetan from China, had
CPC handlers in the Chinese
consulate just south of the
United Nations and reported to
them information on
pro-independence Tibetans in
New York.
This also happens
through the UN. So what about
indictments there? So far SDNY
has only gone after the
bribers - Ng Lap Seng and
Patrick Ho - and not the
bribees, for example Antonio
Guterres. Inner City Press,
banned from the UN for asking
about this, continues to
report on it.
Now on September
9, 2021, a trial date has been
set: September 12, 2022. By
September 30, a Classified
Information Procedures Act
filing. Inner City Press live
tweeted it here
(podcast here)
AUSA: We are
engaged with the powers that
be in DC to meet the new
deadline set by your Honor for
the classified information. We
are limited in what we can do
without the approval of the,
uh, proper person. The
briefing will be ready before
Sept 30
Judge
Komitee: What's the path
forward?
AUSA: We'll make
a length submission then be
guided by your Honor. I don't
know what your reaction to the
briefing will be. Judge
Komitee: The briefing is
mostly about sealing and
redactions, right? How long
might it take?
AUSA from the
National Security Division: I
obviously can't get into the
details... We'll request a
protective order under CIPA
Section 4. Many judges grant
that without any further
briefing. Or you could
schedule an ex parte, in
camera briefing.
Judge
Komitee: My inclination is to
set a trial date for the
second or third quarter of
2022. Does DOJ think that is
realistic? AUSA: I don't think
it's unreasonable.
Defense: I'm an
innocent bystander here, I
have no way to know if it's
reasonable.
Judge Komitee:
I'll set a trial date for
September 12, 2020. And status
conference after the CIPA
deadline, on Oct 18 at noon.
Time is excluded under the
Speedy Trial Act. Adjourned.
Back on
January 6, EDNY Judge Komittee
held a proceeding and Inner
City Press live tweeted it, here
and below.
Now on February
12, Judge Komittee has ordered
Angwang freed on bond, with no
GPS monitoring due to COVID.
Inner City Press live tweeted
it, here:
(Podcast here)
AUSA is asked why
DOJ allowed others accused of
pressuring people to "return"
to China. He says, Angwang had
a duty to disclose his link,
and is tied to Chinese
diplomatic mission in New York
(UN).
Judge Eric
R. Komitee asks if DOJ
appealed other releases on
bond. No, is the answer. But
AUSA emphasizes again
Angwang's failure to disclose,
and links to Chinese Mission
on 35th Street.
Judge Komittee:
If I were to release Mr.
Angwang, how would the fact
that he has tested positive
for COVID be addressed? AUSA:
If MCC is presented with a
release order, he would be
released and be instructed to
quarantine.
AUSA: The
Court could also stay its
order until the releasee tests
negative for COVID. Defense
lawyer: The Angwangs' house in
Williston Park has a finished
basement. He could be
quarantined down there. [Echo
of Chris Cuomo earlier in the
pandemic]
Pre-trial
services: Given Mr. Angwang's
positive COVID status, we
could not put on GPS location
monitoring bracelet. Instead,
we have a program that
randomly calls him on a video
call to see where he is. It
uses facial recognition.
[Sounds like China]
Judge
Komitee: There are new data
points since October. Mr.
Angwang has proposes a more
robust bond offer, two more
properties - in Maryland.
There's a spike in COVID in
the prison. Also, we now know
there are CIPA issues that
will slow the case.
Judge
Komittee: Also, since October
other charged with being
agents of the People's
Republic of China have been
release, in one case over the
government's objection and the
appealed. In others, the
government agreed to bail.
Judge Komittee:
For all these reasons I am
inclined to order Mr.
Angwang's release now.
Defense: All the
suretor's agreed to a $1
million bond. But now it's a
$2 million bond.
Judge Komittee:
The Magistrate Judge will do
that, my law clerk will tee
that up.
Now on
February 2, Angwang's lawyer
offers a new gloss on the
conversations: "Mr. Angwang
cultivated the relationship
with PRC#2 for one reason: PRC
#2, an ethnic Tibetan, was the
community liaison for the
Chinese consulate. PRC #2 was
exclusively vested with the
power to grant or deny
visas applications for
ethnic Tibetans in the New
York area who sought to return
to China. Mr. Angwang was one
such ethnic Tibetan. We are
only now learning about the
Chinese “social credit system”
which is used by the
government to deny Chinese
citizens the right to travel
within the country where they
have been deemed
“untrustworthy” or have spread
“false information.” It has
long been that case that
ex-patriot ethnic Tibetans
have suffered from severe
restrictions on their ability
to obtain visas based upon the
same concerns. The Chinese
government routinely withholds
travel permission from anyone
who has a demonstrated history
of criticizing the PRC
government or who is, merely
Tibetan. The entirety of the
back and forth between Mr.
Angwang and PRC #2, takes
place against this backdrop.
Mr. Angwang plies PRC #2 with
compliments and respect and at
all times adopts a solicitous
and reverential manner – all
with a view towards making
sure that he says or does
nothing that would give PRC #2
concern about vouching for
him. Throughout, it is clear
that Mr. Angwang’s purpose for
having these conversations is
to open PRC #2 up to the idea
of recommending the relaxation
of visa restrictions for
Tibetans. Mr. Angwang can be
seen not only lobbying for his
own visa, but for all ethnic
Tibetans who desire improved
opportunities to visit the
place of their birth. The idea
that Mr. Angwang is an
“intelligence asset”
collecting information about
his fellow Tibetans is simply
not borne out by the
transcripts of the
conversations.
Now,
"SCHEDULING ORDER as to
Baimadajie Angwang re [36]
Letter MOTION for Release from
Custody filed by Baimadajie
Angwang -- The government
shall file a response by
February 5, 2021; and
Defendant shall file a reply,
if any, by February 9, 2021. A
hearing will be held
telephonically on February 12,
2021." Watch this site.
EDNY Judge
Komitee: What is the status of
discovery? AUSA: A second
batch in next week or 2. We
have extended a plea offer. We
are finalizing our motion
under Classified Information
Procedures Act Section II.
[Inner City Press has covered
same on DPRK crypto case]
Judge Komittee: I
thought you'd file CIPA motion
before today. The defendant is
incarcerated so I'd like to
move with speed. When can you
file CIPA motion? AUSA: By end
of this week. We're getting
head of agency declarations.
Judge Komittee:
Tell me about the CIPA status
conference. AUSA: We'll set up
motion schedules under Section
4 to delete or restriction
discovery. [Why does this
scheduling portion have to
exclude Press and public?
Inner City Press may pursue,
in both cases]
AUSA: At
the CIPA status conference, no
classified information will be
discussed. At that point, we'd
request a Classified
Information protective order
under Section 3, with CIPA
officer appointed. Judge
Komittee: When shall we do it?
AUSA: In a month of the motion
Angwang is in the
MDC, where Ghislaine Maxwell
is as well. But he is in
General Population, which
Maxwell says she'd like to be
in. Angwang as been offered
the SHU, since he was / used
law enforcement. This is why
Judge Komittee is, correctly,
trying to move case
"86 MDC
staff members have been
diagnosed with COVID, and even
more inmates," Angwang's
lawyer says. [This morning
Inner City Press covered the
guilty plea proceeding of a
defendant in the MCC who has
tested positive twice for
COVID, story soon on that]
Defense
lawyer implies that Angwang
might consider a resolution
short of trial (that is, a
guilty plea) if he could
review the electronic
discovery. But it is
difficult. Lawyer is
considering another bail
package in, uh, new
circumstances.
Judge Komittee: I
understand just how Draconian
some of the procedures at the
MDC are. Some of them may be
justified. But I am acutely
aware. [Angwang's detention
was upheld by 2d Circuit -
there is no extradition treaty
with China, etc
Judge
Komittee: What is the
defense's view if this is a
complex case for purposes of
the Speedy Trial Act? Defense
lawyer: The discovery is
voluminous. I have no sense of
what is in there. I am not
prepared to consent.
Judge Komittee to
AUSA: Let's not let case be
slowed by access to documents
issue. I expect the parties to
cooperate. The government
should justify Complex Case by
a week from Friday, in a
letter by January 15. AUSA: We
may fold it into our CIPA
Section II motion
Judge Komittee:
For now I'm excluding time
under the Speedy Trial Act.
What about Angwang's medical
issues? I'm happy to consider
any request... Defense may
file something. Adjourned.
Podcast here.
Back on
October 2, Angwang was ordered
freed, with a stay until the
end of the day. Then in an
appeal, the stay was extended
until October 6 or 7, pending
briefings. Inner City Press
live tweeted the appeal
arguemnt, below.
On October 7,
Judge Eric Komitee ordered
Angwang's continued detention.
Full 16-pagedecision here,
free, on Inner City Press'
DocumentCloud.
On November 17,
Angwang's appeal was heard in
the Second Circuit Court of
Appeals. Inner City Press
again live tweeted, here:
Judge Wesley: The
District Court was troubled by
your client's untruthfulness.
Angwang's lawyer
John Carman: I had no contact
with him at that time. So
there's an incomplete record.
His employment with private
Chinese individual in 2014 is
irrelevant.
Judge Wesley: Did
you misspeak about it?
Carman:
I didn't have all the info
about his relationship with
this private individual.
Judge Wesley: Is
there a trial date?
Carman:
They intend to introduce FISA
information - could take
months. No trial to 2022-23.
Judge Wesley: In
similar cases, there is
detention.
Carman:
But Angwang is a US citizen.
Judge Katzmann:
Judge Wesley raised the issue
of deceit...
Carman: The
District Court replied on
holes in the pre-trial
services report... He
acknowledged NYPD job, just
not the private employment
AUSA Matthew
Haggans: Angwang said to his
handler, he hoped the info
would boost his status with
the PRC government - while
serving with NYPD. The
District Court was also
concerned with severe risk of
flight in this case. He said
he would be content to return
to China for gov't
Judge: What about
deceit? AUSA: There more
context. During the arrest and
search pursuant to warrant,
the gov found NY drivers'
licenses, passports and
applications, for St Kitts
& Nevis.
Judge: He was
going to use another's
identity? IDs not useful if
for a woman
Judge: I don't
understand the risk of
flight... Now he's a US
citizen. He's got a little
child and his wife. How could
they leave? If they weren't a
risk of flight you wouldn't
charge them bail.
AUSA: Angwang
knows where to turn, PRC
consulate Judge: That's fair
Judge: Why not
send this back to be
reconsidered without
denaturalization being in it?
AUSA: Uh... the court has that
power. Angwang's lawyer: The
Consulate, Angwang was only
dealing with because he's an
ethnic Tibetan. He can't get a
10 year visa for $50.
Judge Walker:
He's not just a Tibetan
walking in off the street into
the consulate.
Lawyer: But they
don't give him a visa. So did
he give them anything, for all
of his posturing? I think, No.
He doesn't get what he's
looking for. Judge: Time's up
And now on
December 11, the Second
Circuit has upheld Angwang's
detention: "Appeal from an
order of the United States
District Court for the Eastern
District of New York (Komitee,
J.). UPON DUE CONSIDERATION,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,
ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the
order of the district court is
AFFIRMED. Defendant-appellant
Baimadajie Angwang appeals
from an order entered on
October 7, 2020, in the United
States District Court for the
Eastern District of New York
(Komitee, J.), detaining him
pending trial. Angwang is
alleged to have, inter alia,
acted as an unregistered agent
of the People’s Republic of
China (“PRC”) by communicating
with a PRC official while
serving as an NYPD officer.
The district court denied bail
on the ground that “no
condition or combination of
conditions w[ould] reasonably
assure the appearance of”
Angwang as required under 18
U.S.C. § 3142(e). D. Ct. ECF
No. 16 (“Bail Order”) at
3. 1 We assume the
parties’ familiarity with the
underlying facts, the
procedural history of the
case, and the issues on
appeal...Even excluding any
considerations of
denaturalization, there was no
such error here. The district
court carefully considered the
18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) factors,
including both mitigating
facts such as Angwang’s
military service, as well as
aggravating facts. We find no
clear error in the district
court’s conclusion that, on
balance, the aggravating
facts—including Angwang’s
strong ties to the PRC, his
access to significant
financial resources, and the
seriousness of the allegations
against him—render Angwang a
flight risk. This holds true
even absent any consideration
of Angwang’s possible
denaturalization, particularly
in light of Angwang’s two
failed arguments above.
Accordingly, the district
court did not clearly err in
its ultimate denial of
bail. 5 We have
considered Angwang’s remaining
arguments and find in them no
basis for reversal.
Accordingly, the judgment of
the district court is
AFFIRMED."
Inner City
Press has asked
China's UN Ambassador Zhang
Jun about it: "What about
today's indictment &
detention of your citizen
Baimadajie Angwang for spying
on New Yorkers from Tibet for
your consulate? Is it for your
Mission that
@AntonioGuterres has
banned Inner City Press from
#UNGA? What's your view of
Patrick Ho/CEFC? Xièxiè." We
said "we will report any
answer(s)."
The response as
been for China's "Ambassador"
to the UN Zhang Jun to block
Inner City Press on Twitter.
Now on
October 1, still blocked and
banned from UNSC press
conference, Inner City Press
has learned that Angwang will
be arguing for bail on October
2: "USA V.
ANGWANG. Criminal
Cause for Bail
Application.* Deft. –
Baimadajie Angwang, NYPD
police officer charged with
acting as an agent of a
foreign government (People’s
Republic of China) without
prior notification to the
Attorney General, wire fraud,
false statements and
obstruction of an official
proceeding. United
States Magistrate Judge Lois
Bloom." We'll be there.
Inner City Press
published the detention memo,
here.
More than
an hour late at 4:30 pm on
September 21, Angwang was
presented in EDNY. Inner City
Press live tweeted it, here:
EDNY Magistrate
Judge Roanne L. Mann asks
Baimadajie Angwang if he
understands his rights.
He says, "Yes
your honor." [How many people
has he Mirandized? For whom?]
She says the
charge involves not telling
the DOJ he was working for
China. [Note: in SDNY
there's also a case of UN
staffer Karim Elkorany for
false statements, about him
drugging and raping women in
Iraq. The UN covered that one
up - what's its role here?]
Mann: You obstructed National
Security investigation, per
the charges.
Angwang has
privately retained as his
lawyer John Carman. [Who is
paying him?] Angwang is
consenting to detention,
unlike for example PPP
fraudster Muge Ma, and Patrick
Ho was he was arrested.
Magistrate Judge
Mann: I am entering a
permanent order of detention
without prejudice and am
terminating the
proceeding.
Watch this
site.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|