Community Reinvestment Act
Credit For Coronavirus Means Comment Period
Must Be Extended
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Periscope
BBC
- Decrypt
- LightRead - Honduras
-
Source
BRONX / SDNY,
March 20 -- With the
Community Reinvestment Act
under attack by US Comptroller
of the Currency Josephy
Otting, Fair Finance Watch and
Inner City Press on March 11
submitted a third comment this
time making an obvious
request.
They ask that in
light of Coronavirus /
COVID-19 the comment period on
the assault on CRA be extended
for months. See
also here.
Now, with
Otting still
resisting
postponing his
dream of
weakening the
CRA, his OCC
has joined not
only his
sometime
partner in
crime the FDIC
but also the
Fed in
speaking on
the
Coronavirus
COVID-19
crisis,
offering banks
CRA credit for
any and
everything
they do in any
way related to
the virus.
Fine - but
doesn't that
make it
absolutely
clear Otting
has to
indefinitely
postpone
closing the
comment period
on his
destructive
proposal?
Watch this
site.
Here
it was: March 11, 2020
Re: Docket ID OCC-2018-0008 -
3d opposition to OCC/FDIC plan
to weaken CRA - demand that
comment period be extended for
months in light of Coronavirus
COVID-19 & OCC inaction
To whom it may
concern at the OCC and
FDIC: On
behalf of Fair Finance Watch,
and Inner City Press, and in
my personal capacity, this is
a third timely comment
opposing the proposal by
Comptroller Joseph Otting and
the FDIC to weaken the
CRA. To be
clear: the comment period must
now be extended for months in
light of Coronavirus /
COVID-19. This is based on the
Administration's own
statements on the topic, and
what we can only interpret at
the OCC's furthering weakening
by it, with no response to our
timely comments on Northfield
Bank - Victory State Bank, no
documents response to our FOIA
request about this CRA
proposal and the Comptroller's
schedule, and the OCC's
failure to inquire into even
branch closings int he CBNA -
Steuben Trust proposal we
comments on. This is not the
time to be slipping through an
undermining of
CRA.
Note,
simply as examples, that
Federal courts have shut down
(see, e.g., the Eastern
District of Washington), whole
law firms have, and the
containment of New Rochelle,
NY just above The Bronx. The
comment period must be
extended.
Enforcing the CRA
including through commenting
to the Federal Reserve and
FDIC, and OCC under previous
Comptrollers, the results have
been new bank branches in the
South Bronx, and lending and
consumer protection
commitments well
beyond. Now under
Otting the OCC is ignoring,
rebuffing and sometimes simply
rejecting such public
comments. This as Otting says
he is personally unaware of
discrimination. So, during and
in connection with this
comment period on his attempt
to more systematically defang
the CRA, Fair Finance Watch
has commented on a proposed
acquisition by a national bank
which settled race
discrimination charges, Evans
Bank: "Evans had redlined
Buffalo’s predominantly
African-American East Side
neighborhoods, intentionally
excluding these neighborhoods
from its lending area.
Evans Bank also allegedly
developed mortgage products
that it made unavailable to
these neighborhoods,
notwithstanding the
creditworthiness of the
applicants; and refused to
solicit customers, market
mortgages or provide banking
facilities in those
neighborhoods. The
lawsuit alleged that by
redlining the East Side
neighborhoods, which are home
to more than 85,000 people,
Evans excluded an area that is
home to the vast majority of
Buffalo’s African-American
population from the marketing
and sales of its mortgage
products and
services."
This is a
national bank. Its Fairport
Savings application should be
denied. And for the record,
the CFPB's elimination of the
HMDA informaiton that has been
available on the FFIEC's and
even its own website for 2017
data is part of the
destruction of CRA and HMDA of
which the OCC is a
part. Also for the
record, "Nasca says there may
be consolidation of some back
office staff." Public hearings
should be held. But Otting
routinely denies such
requests.
Aain, since Otting became
Comptroller, we have seen
timely comments ignored, and
been denied access to bank
merger applications by a
retaliatory imposition of FOIA
fees. The Federal Reserve and
other federal agencies, like
the OCC pre-Otting, grant
Inner City Press FOIA fee
waivers. Under Otting, the OCC
does not. On Chinatown FSB,
the OCC refused to consider a
timely comment. The OCC
unilaterally determined not to
accept public comments on a
major bank's charter
conversion application, which
it rubber stamped. This has
been rogue-like
behavior. As
a proud member of NCRC we join
in its comments. The
central point of CRA is
ensuring that banks meet local
needs. For agencies to
ascertain that, they must
listen carefully to the
public. But Otting
has shown that he does not, or
does so only selectively. The
proposal must be rejected. We
will have further comments.
Matthew R Lee Fair Finance
Watch (and Inner City Press)
New York.
Your comment was
submitted successfully!
Comment Tracking Number:
k7n-zxq6-onzv Your
comment has been sent for
review. This process is
dependent on agency public
submission policies/procedures
and processing times. Watch
this site
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|