CRA Litmus
Test As M&T People's Challenged On
Racial Disparities In Lending in NY CT PA
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
FEDERAL COURT / S
Bronx, March 27 – Whether or
not the U.S. Community
Reinvestment Act will be again
enforced until the new
Administration and its
regulators is an open
question. And the proposed
merger of two redlining banks,
M&T and People's United,
will be the litmus test.
On March
27, Fair Finance Watch and
Inner City Press on the FOIA
filed a challenge with the
Federal Reserve to the banks'
application: "This is a timely
first comment opposing and
requesting an extension of the
FRB's public comment period on
the Applications by M&T
Bank Corporation to acquire
People's United
Financial.
The
applicant M&T in New York
State in 2019 made 8,613 home
loans to whites and only 629
to African Americans.
M&T in New York State in
2019 made 3.4 loans to whites
for each denial to whites. It
made only 1.4 loans to African
Americans for every denial to
African Americans.
This is
totally
unacceptable.
The
applicant M&T in
Connecticut in 2019 made 251
home loans to whites and only
27 to African Americans.
M&T in Connecticut in 2019
made 2 loans to whites for
each denial to whites. It made
only 1.28 loans to African
Americans for every denial to
African
Americans.
This is unacceptable.
The applicant M&T in
Pennsylvania in 2019 made 3565
home loans to whites and only
106 to African Americans.
M&T in
Pennsylvania in 2019 made 2.52
loans to whites for each
denial to whites. It made only
1.15 loans to African
Americans for every denial to
African Americans.
This is
totally unacceptable.
Meanwhile, People's says it
will close some 140
branches.
FFW and Inner City Press have
been deeply concerned about
the rush by the FRS' penchant
to rubberstamp mergers by
redliners, particularly during
the pandemic. We note the
Fed's recent website statement
that a comment period has been
extended to allow
participation amid the
Coronavirus crisis. This
should be done, by the Fed's
logic, on this and other
applications. We timely
request public
hearings.
The
hearings, and your review,
should also address M&T's
discrimation, see, e.g., (EEOC
v. Manufacturers and Traders
Trust Co., d/b/a M&T
Bank., Civil Action No.
1:16-cv-03180-ELH) in U.S.
District Court for the
District of Maryland, Northern
Division. See also, this.
The
comment period should be
extended; evidentiary hearings
should be held; and on the
current record, the
application should not be
approved.
Meanwhile
in Federal court, PNC Bank and
its Midland Loan Services have
been sued for usury, predatory
lending and civil conspiracy,
under New York and Federal
law.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|