BMO Harris
BNP Faced Fed Qs After Admitting
Mislabeling Info Now Promises, Promises
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Story
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
FED COURT / S
Bronx, Nov 2 – Whether or not
the U.S. Community
Reinvestment Act will actually
be enforced under the
Administration and its
regulators remains an open
question. Consider: Inner City
Press immediately reported
that BMO Harris' application
to buy Bank of the West and
its more than 500 branches
from BNP would be a litmus
test.
Fair
Finance Watch noted, from Day
1, that in 2020 BMO Harris
denied many more mortgage
applications from African
Americans than it approved:
509 denied versus only 223
loans made to African
Americans, nationwide. BMO's
numbers for whites were the
reverse: 9270 loans made,
versus less then six thousand
denials. As noted, there are
also climate and secrecy
issues. Fair Finance Watch and
other raised branch closings.
On October 14, the banks' counsel sent
Fair Finance Watch what purported to be a copy
of its submission to the Fed under the Ex
Parte Rules -- but the entire thing was
withheld, under this cover message: "Attached
is the public portion of the BMO response to
the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago’s request
for additional information received on October
3, 2022. Please
feel free to reach out to me with any
questions. Best,
Ro Ro Spaziani
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz." No
substance was attached, just a request for
confidential treatment
This is
outrageous. The Fed itself
should make these exhibits
public.
On October 17,
the Fed sent Fair Finance
Watch a copy of letter to "Ro"
- "Dear Ro: Please provide a
response including supporting
documentation, to the
following request: 1. Provide
the cover page for the FR Y-3F
and responses to any questions
that were not already covered
in the initial FR Y-3 filing.
Provide your response by
October 25, 2022, eight
business days from the date of
this letter."
On October 26,
belatedly more formal, the Fed
asked: "Dear Rosemary:
Please provide responses to
each of the following
requests. Supporting
documentation, as appropriate,
should be provided... Describe
whether the combined banking
organization would expand upon
each bank’s community
development activities if the
proposal is consummated, and
identify those community
development activities."
On November 2, to
that, this: "Describe whether
the combined banking
organization would expand upon
each bank’s community
development activities if the
proposal is consummated, and
identify those community
development activities. BHB is
in the final stages of
completing a Community Benefit
Plan that will cover the first
five years after consummation
of the Proposed Transaction.
In connection with that plan,
BHB will increase its overall
level of community development
lending, investments and
philanthropic giving above
current levels. When
considering its qualified
community development lending,
investments and philanthropy
during the five year plan
period, BHB will prioritize
investments in affordable
housing, rural housing needs,
economic development,
workforce development,
sustainability, digital
inclusion and financing for
homeowners and small
businesses. BHB will be in a
position to share the
Community Benefit Plan
shortly. 3 The
Proposed Transaction will
expand the combined
organizations community
development activities in a
number of ways. BHB has an
experienced community
development team that lend to
and invest in affordable
housing and economic
development projects and will
bring their expertise and
innovative approach to
affordable housing,
revitalization and economic
development to the BOTW
markets. With respect to
community development lending,
BHB and BOTW both provide
loans in connection with Low
Income Housing Tax Credit
(“LIHTC”) financing products.
However, BHB also owns a
“qualified Community
Development Entity” (“CDE”),
which allocates federal new
market tax credits (“NMTC”)
for economic development and
social service projects. As a
combined organization, BHB’s
CDE would expand its
allocation focus to BOTW’s
footprint and surrounding
rural markets. BHB will also
continue to support
government, non-profit and
middle market lending that
benefit LMI communities and
communities of color. BHB will
continue to expand its
investments in bonds to school
districts and municipalities
that assist with
infrastructure for LMI
communities or constituents,
and loans to municipalities to
aid with infrastructure and
other needs, especially those
that benefit LMI geographies
or other underrepresented
groups. With respect to
community development
investments, both BHB and BOTW
currently invest in LIHTCs,
which BHB will continue
following closing. BHB is also
an active investor in asset
classes beyond those of
BOTW’s, with investments in
CRA-qualified private equity
funds, Small Business
Investment Company-licensed
funds, loan funds and
Community Development
Financial Institutions. The
combined organization will
increase BHB’s current
investment activity in these
asset classes to target BOTW’s
CRA assessment areas. In
addition to the foregoing, BHB
recognizes that organizations
led by women and persons of
color face obstacles in
attracting funding and
investments, and BHB will
prioritize its philanthropic
giving to these organizations
where possible. In connection
with the upcoming Community
Benefit Plan, BHB will reserve
75% of its philanthropic
commitment for endeavors that
serve minority organizations
or communities, or are led by
people of color or women. In
connection with the Community
Benefit Plan, BHB will support
at least 75 organizations it
has not supported in the past
over the five years of the
plan, with at least 10 new
philanthropic partnerships in
BHB’s top three states by
deposits (IL, CA and WI) and
five new philanthropic
partnerships in next four top
states by deposits (MN, AZ, CO
and IN). BHB also will work to
increase the average size of
CRA-qualified grants from an
average of approximately
$32,000, to an average of
$40,000-50,000 by the end of
the five year plan period."
Watch this site.
The banks in an
August 3 letter belatedly
admitted: "One commenter
requested that certain
confidential exhibits to the
April 12, 2022 responses to
the Federal Reserve as well as
certain confidential exhibits
to the initial Federal Reserve
application be made public.
The parties have reviewed this
information and have concluded
that some of this information
can be public." So why did
they mislabel it, and the Fed
allow it? The comment period
must be reopened. Especially
in light of this:
The banks now
claim: "Commenters criticized
BNP Paribas S.A.’s15 and BMO’s
efforts related to climate
resiliency and lending to the
fossil fuel
industry...Similarly, BNP
Paribas and BOTW have some of
the financial services
industry’s most restrictive
financing policies concerning
the most damaging forms of
fossil fuel extraction and
have minimal exposure to the
fossil fuel exploration and
extraction sectors."
But consider:
"Following the UK government's
decision to give "final
regulatory approval" to
Shell's Jackdaw gas field in
the North Sea, a coalition of
climate organizations
sent a letter to the oil
major's biggest bankers
calling for a halt to the
project. The letter was sent
to 25 financiers of Shell,
including the top five
financiers in the period 2016
- 2021: BNP Paribas... Almost
all of the bank recipients of
the letter have commitments to
reach “Net Zero” in their
financed emissions by 2050,
including the top five – all
members of the Net Zero
Banking Alliance (NZBA). The
letter highlights the
incompatibility between these
banks’ financial relationship
with Shell and their own
climate commitments,
potentially exposing them to
significant reputational,
legal, financial and other
risks."
We'll have more
on this- watch this site.
Inner City
Press (and Fair Finance Watch,
on the HMDA) will have more to
say about this. Watch this
site.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|