Old National
- 1st Midwest Was Protested on MN &
Indiana CRA Now Fed Has 14 Questions
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Story
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
FEDERAL COURT / S
Bronx, July 22 – Whether or
not the U.S. Community
Reinvestment Act will be again
enforced until the new
Administration and its
regulators is an open
question. And the proposed
merger of two redlining banks,
M&T and People's United,
will be a litmus test, see
below.
And this one: Old
National's proposal to buy
First Midwest. On June 28,
Fair Finance Watch and Inner
City Press on the FOIA) filed
the below with the Fed.
And now on July
21-22, these Federal Reserve
questions to Old National's
outside counsel at Patton
Boggs: "July 21, 2021
Ms. Katie Wechsler Of Counsel
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
2550 M Street, NW Washington,
DC 20037 Dear Ms. Wechsler:
This correspondence relates to
the application submitted by
Old National Bancorp (Old
National), Evansville,
Indiana, to acquire through
merger First Midwest Bancorp
(First Midwest), and its
subsidiary, First Midwest
Bank, both of Chicago,
Illinois, pursuant to section
3 of the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 and Section 225.15
of Regulation Y of the Board
of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (Board). Based
on staff’s review of the
current record, the following
additional information,
including the information in
the Confidential Attachment,
is requested. Supporting
documentation, as appropriate,
should be provided. Financial
and Managerial 1. Provide pro
forma financial statements and
capital ratios as of June 30,
2021 for Old National and Old
National Bank, as soon as
available. 2. Provide the
employment agreement for
Michael Scudder. 3. Provide an
update, if any, on the status
of other required regulatory
approvals for the proposed
transaction, including state
approvals. 4. Confirm the
anticipated closing date of
the merger. Confirm whether
the bank merger and the
holding company merger will
occur on the same date. Legal
5. In response to Question 16
of the FR Y-3 application
dated June 18, 2021 (“the
Application”), you state that
First Midwest Bank has five
active wholly-owned operating
subsidiaries. The list of five
subsidiaries includes “First
Midwest Holdings, Inc.” twice,
and indicates that First
Midwest Holdings, Inc. has a
wholly-owned subsidiary, FMB
Investments Ltd. a.
Confirm the number of active
wholly-owned operating
subsidiaries held either
directly or indirectly by
First Midwest Bank. If any of
these subsidiaries were not
listed in response to Question
16, identify them and provide
brief descriptions of their
respective activities.
b. Confirm whether First
Midwest Securities Management,
LLC is a wholly- owned
operating subsidiary of First
Midwest Bank. If so, provide a
brief description of its
activities. 6. As
referenced in the Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated May
30, 2021, provide the First
Midwest Disclosure Schedule
and Old National Disclosure
Schedule. 7. The response to
Question 21(d) of the
Application does not indicate
whether any state community
reinvestment laws apply to Old
National. 12 U.S.C. §
1842(d)(3)(B) requires the
Board to consider an
applicant’s record of
compliance with applicable
state community reinvestment
laws. Confirm that the Old
National organization (i.e.,
Old National and its
subsidiaries) is not subject
to a state community
reinvestment law in any
jurisdiction in which it
operates. If the Old National
organization is subject to a
state community reinvestment
law, discuss the Old National
organization’s record of
compliance with the applicable
state law(s). Convenience and
Needs and Consumer Compliance
8. Page 4 of the Application
states that the “Resultant
Bank” will continue to
maintain all the current
branches of both Old National
Bank and First Midwest Bank;
however, the response to
Question 20(c) also states,
“As of this date, no final
decision has been made with
respect to branch closing or
consolidations.” a. Clarify
whether a decision will be
made prior to consummation on
which branches will be closed
or consolidated as a result of
the merger. b. Provide
information about how branches
will be evaluated when
determining whether branches
will be closed or consolidated
as a result of the merger. c.
Discuss how the impact of any
branch closures in low- and
middle-income and/or
majority-minority communities
will be mitigated. 9.
Describe which components of
First Midwest Bank’s and Old
National Bank’s consumer
compliance programs will be
adopted into the Resultant
Bank’s consumer compliance
program.
10. Provide
information on the Resultant
Bank’s processes and
procedures in the event that
products are discontinued for
existing customers and
existing customers are
transitioned into new products
as a result of the merger. 11.
Confirm whether the Resultant
Bank plans to expand its
Community Reinvestment Act
assessment areas after the
merger beyond the existing
assessment areas of both Old
National Bank and First
Midwest Bank. Please submit
your response to the Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis
within eight business days. In
accordance with the Board’s
procedures regarding ex parte
communications, provide a copy
of the public portion of your
response (together with any
attachments) directly to the
commenter."
The comment: Dear
Chair Powell, Secretary
Misback and others in the FRS:
This is a timely first comment
opposing and requesting an
extension of the FRB's public
comment period on the
Applications by Old National
Bancorp, Evansville, Indiana;
to merge with First Midwest
Bancorp, Inc., and thereby
indirectly acquire First
Midwest
Bank.
The
applicant Old Nationa in
Indiana in 2019 based on its
disparate marketing made 3312
mortgage loans to whites, with
1060 denials to whites --
while making only SIXTY TWO
loans to African Americans,
with more than that in
denials: 65. This is
outrageous. This
is unacceptable.
Worse, in 2020 in
Indiana Old National made MORE
loans to whites than in 2019
(3976) and essentially the
same to African Americans
(65).
In 2020 in
Minnesota, based on its
disparate marketing, Old
National made 1387 loans to
whites, and only fifty to
African
American.
This is totally
unacceptable.
So is this:
"First Midwest CEO likely to
see pay jump following Old ...
First Midwest's merger with
the Evansville, Ind.-based
parent of Old National Bank
will have the unusual
distinction of employing two
bank CEOs and two bank...."-
Crain's Chicago
Business
There is no public benefit to
this
proposal.
FFW and Inner City Press have
been deeply concerned about
the rush by the FRS' penchant
to rubberstamp mergers by
redliners, particularly during
the pandemic. We note the
Fed's recent website statement
that a comment period has been
extended to allow
participation amid the
Coronavirus crisis. This
should be done, by the Fed's
logic, on this and other
applications. Inner City Press
has already filed a FOIA
request with the Board for
records, today, with the
application still not on the
Board's website, which has no
comment period running past
June 17 - the responsive
records must be provided
before the comment period can
close.
Inner City
Press (and Fair Finance Watch,
on the HMDA) will have more to
say about this. Watch this
site.
While
M&T - People's United
still pends in the Federal
Reserve, with a promised
expedited FOIA response still
not forthcoming, the Fed in
mid May approved PNC - BBVA,
with a rare abstention by
Governor Lael Brainard, albeit
on antitrust and not CRA or
fair lending grounds.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|