In
Sudan
Alchemy,
Ladsous' UN
Peacekeeping
Excused, Bashir
Meeting
Airbrushed Out
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, April
9, 2014 -- How
can one write
about the
corruption of
a UN Peacekeeping
mission, at
length,
without naming
the person in
charge? Why
would one
airbrush that
person, in
this case
Herve Ladsous
the UN Under
Secretary for
Peacekeeping
Operations,
out?
The former
spokesperson
of the UNAMID
mission in
Darfur quit,
spoke out and
finally leaked
documents.
Radio Dabanga
as well as
Foreign Policy
began
publishing
them on April
7 (FP did not
mention Dabanga,
and calls it back
to back
Ladsous-less
pieces an
exclusive
investigation).
Today's piece
focuses on the
US role, all
to the good,
but not only
doesn't
mention that
the UN's
Ladsous met
with
International
Criminal Court
indictee Omar
al Bashir in
July, without
providing any
read-out,
but also omits
France's
hosting of
Darfur rebels,
for example.
There are also
other UN
agencies
thrown out of
Sudan - Inner
City Press has
questions in
about just
such a story,
watch this
site.
On April 8
Inner City
Press asked UN
deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq
about the
leaks, until a
scribe in the
seat of the UN
Correspondents
Association
cut off the
questioning to
suggest a
background
briefing "not
today, not
tomorrow," but
sometime in
the future.
From the UN
transcript:
Inner
City Press: I
wanted to ask
about, again,
the former
Spokesperson
of
UNAMID
(African
Union-United
Nations Hybrid
Operation in
Darfur),
Aicha Elbasri.
She, in the
document that
she’s given to
Radio
Dabanga and
Foreign
Policy, one
thing in
particular I
wanted to ask
you about is
an e-mail to
Michael Meyer,
then, I guess,
as the Head
of
Communications
of UNAMID, and
she says
specifically:
“I believe
that by
selecting
certain facts
and providing
the media,
including
Nesirky’s
office, with
incomplete/somewhat
inaccurate
information
may constitute
a breach of
the PI policy
of the UN.”
This had to
do with an
attack on a
peacekeeping
base. And I
wanted to
know, one,
you said that
you won’t
comment on
leaks. This
seems to go to
the
heart of the
credibility of
the process
here.
Basically, the
person
providing
information
from Darfur
protested that
inaccurate or
incomplete
information
was being
given to your
office. So, I
wanted
to know, it
seems like you
would want to
comment on it,
but, if not
on that, does
your office
still stand
behind the 19
April 2013,
statement by
the
Secretary-General,which
now is cast in
entirely
different
light by the
leaked
documents?
Deputy
Spokesman
Farhaq Haq:
The statements
we put out
reflect the
most
accurate
information
that were
available to
get at the
time. If
further
information
comes along
down the line,
we try to
adjust the
records so
that we have
the most
up-to-date
information.
And in all
cases, we do
try to get
further
information,
including on
cases in
Darfur. Yes?
UNCA:
Farhan, rather
than
cherry-picking
[cutting off
questioning] Video here
That Ladsous'
Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations
would cover up
attacks on the
troops it
receives from
Rwanda,
Nigeria,
Gambia and
elsewhere is a
trend -- but
the leaving
unprotected,
or even active
harming, of
civilians is
something
else. This is
what has
happened under
Ladsous' DPKO
-- but it
cannot or will
no be exposed
without naming
Ladsous.
Nor is this
problem
limited to
UNAMID in
Darfur. Just
from the four
corners of a
quoted email,
the new head
of the mission
in Cote
d'Ivoire
Aïchatou
Mindaoudou
Souleymane of
Niger is
included. Is
that mission
less tightly
bound to the
government,
and to the
French troops
in the Force
Licorne?
On the 20th
anniversary of
the Rwanda
genocide's
beginning,
when then and
now Eastern
Congo player
Herve Ladsous
told Inner
City Press "I
never answer
your
questions,"
more questions
of Ladsous'
veracity were
put to UN
deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq, video here.
As if to
explain not
only Ladsous'
refusal to
answer Press
questions
about rapes in
Minova by his
partners in
the Congolese
Army but also
the
discrepancy
between his
statements in
New York and
memos to his
mission in
Darfur, Haq in
response
contrasted the
"good will of
the host
Government
required to
allow
peacekeepers
to do their
jobs, and the
sometimes
contradictory
imperative to
report
accurately and
candidly."
In Kigali
earlier in the
day, Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon said
that his
Rights Up
Front program
-- adopted in
the wake of
the UN's 2009
failure in Sri
Lanka -- sends
a signal to UN
representatives
to "Speak up,
even if it may
offend." But
then Haq again
said that the
need for the
good will of
governments
like Sudan's
contradict
reporting
accurately and
candidly,"
transcript
below.
Ladsous throws
this out the
window: simply
refusing to
answer
questions or
questioners he
doesn't like.
That is
Ladsous'
"Rights Up
Front."
From the UN's
April 7, 2014
transcript:
Inner
City Press:
Sure, Farhan.
I wanted to
ask you about
these memos,
including by
Under-Secretary-General
Ladsous,
leaked by
Aicha Elbasri
of the former
Spokesman of
UNAMID. I
wanted to ask
specifically
about the
incident in
March 2013
where the
kidnapping
took place. I
had asked here
in this room
about it and
your office
had said you
were checking
back with
them. And a
memo has
emerged from
Mr. Ladsous to
Mr. Chambas of
10 April 2013,
making
references to
reports being
made that he
was still
unclear. One,
I wanted to
know what’s
your response
— what was
ever done,
actually done,
to ensure —
what were the
findings? What
were the… I
have seen Mr.
Ladsous’
statement, but
what were the
actual
findings about
this incident,
about the
peacekeepers
that were
involved, and
basically,
what more can
you say about
it? Seems to
be that Mr.
Ladsous and
DPKO
[Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations]
were saying
things here in
New York that
were not, or
tend to be
disproved by
some of the
memos that
have been
released,
including by
Radio Dabanga
and Foreign
Policy.
Deputy
Spokesman
Farhan Haq:
Well, first
off, of course
I don’t have a
comment on the
leaked memos.
We’ll try to
follow up and
see what was
done regarding
the specific
March 2013
incident
because there
was follow-up,
some of which
I believe we
reported here
at the time
from this
podium. If we
have any
further
details we’ll
share it with
you then.
Inner
City Press:
What about the
end-of-mission?
I’d also asked
about Ms.
Elbasri; she
seems like she
had, before
making this
leak, she had
said, gone
public and
said that she
did an
end-of-mission
report in
which she
accused UNAMID
of basically
covering up
crimes in
Darfur. So
one, I mean,
if you are not
commenting on
the memos —
they have all
kinds of
markings and
stampings — do
you contest
their
veracity? And
two, what can
you say about
her
end-of-mission
report? What
steps were
taken? Did
DPKO
disbelieve
her? Did they
make any
changes? And
if she tried
internally,
why can’t she
go externally
by leaking?
Deputy
Spokesman Haq:
Well, first of
all, like I
said, I won’t
comment.
Trying to make
a comment on
the veracity
is commenting,
and I’m not
commenting on
leaked memos.
Beyond that,
regarding the
sort of
criticisms,
part of what
we’ve been
trying to do
is deal with
the problems
that the
mission faces.
In the case of
UNAMID, as
with every
other mission,
there is
tension
between the
necessity to
preserve the
consent and
good will of
the host
Government
required to
allow
peacekeepers
to do their
jobs, and the
sometimes
contradictory
imperative to
report
accurately and
candidly on
any and all
incidents of
violence.
UN
Peacekeeping
is aware of
the issues
raised,
including in
this series of
articles and
foreignpolicy.com,
and it takes
them very
seriously. As
far as that
goes, the
Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations
launched a
strategic
review
recently to
assess
UNAMID’s
performance in
an environment
in which new
conflict
dynamics have
emerged and
old ones
remain
unaddressed.
You’ll have
seen the
special report
of the
Secretary-General
on the
strategic
review of
UNAMID, which
was published
in February.
It identifies
three main
challenges
faced by the
mission in
implementing
its mandate:
the
cooperation of
the
Government;
internal
managerial and
coordination
issues,
especially
with the UN
country team;
and the
capabilities
of our troops
and police
contributors.
And so that
strategic
review has
gone to the
Security
Council, where
it has
received
support from
the Security
Council. And
we’ll see what
we can do to
further
improve the
work of the
mission.
Back
on March
25, 2013,
Inner City
Press asked
the UN
Spokesperson
about how the
UN
Peacekeeping
in Darfur
could have let
a group of
Internally
Displaced
People be
kidnapped
while they
were
ostensibly
protected:
Inner
City Press:
there is this
incident where
IDPs were
taken hostage
or kidnapped
by people that
were in
Government
army uniforms,
and somehow
UNAMID is
saying that
they opposed
it and they
denounced the
kidnapping,
but some
people are
wondering how
armed UN
peacekeepers
could have
IDPs under
their care and
they could all
be kidnapped.
Can you
clarify how it
took place and
how it is
consistent
with
protection of
civilians?
Spokesperson:
Well, I have
asked the
Mission for
more details
on that, and I
think if you
were listening
carefully you
will have
heard me read
out precisely
what you just
said to me.
Inner
City Press:
But what I am
asking about
specifically
about how it
could take
place?
Spokesperson:
I heard what
you said, and
I’ve said that
I’ll see if I
can find out
more, which is
what I have
already asked
the Mission
and
Peacekeeping
Operations.
Now
Radio Dabanga
has published
a memo by UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous, from
April 10, 2013,
still saying
he didn't know
how it
happened.
What is
Ladsous doing?
Then, and
apparently
now, he
refuses Press
questions
about topics
ranging from
Sudan -- why
did he meet
with
International
Criminal Court
indictee Omar
al Bashir in
July 2013? --
to rapes
in the DR
Congo by UN
Peacekeeping's
partners in
the Congolese
Army.
Dabanga
to
its credit says it is reporting the
memos along
with FP.
The FP
story,
at least the
first one,
does not
mention
Dabanga,
nor Ladsous'
meeting
with Bashir.
Previously an
explanation
was provided
for not
reporting on
Ladsous'
extraordinary
and public
"non-answering,"
noted
from the UK by
the New
Statesman,
here.
Will
the
publication of
these leaks,
in a non
Ladsous
protective way
by Radio
Dabanga,
finally help
bring
accountability?
The
citation is to
former UNAMID
spokesperson
Aicha Elbasri.
Back on
February 4,
2014, Inner
City Press
asked UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesperson
about the
full-on
critique of
UNAMID and
DPKO by Ms
Elbasri:
Inner
City Press: On
Darfur, maybe
you have
something on
the Government
ordering the
ICRC
(International
Committee of
the Red Cross)
to suspend
operations.
And I also
wanted to know
if there’s any
response from
the UN to
former UNAMID
[African
Union-United
Nations Hybrid
Operation in
Darfur]
spokesperson
Aicha Elbasri.
She’s gone
public, saying
basically
that, while
serving as
spokesperson
of UNAMID, she
wasn’t given
information;
that the
Mission
under-reports
abuses of
civilians and
other
developments
in Darfur. I
wanted to
know, what’s
the response
of the UN to
that?
Spokesperson:
I’d
have to check
with the
Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations on
both of those.
So,
respecting
that, Inner
City Press
waited. The
answers
weren't
directly
provided by
e-mail as the
UN does with
other, but
read out at
the noon
briefing,
apparently to
see if anyone
else might
report more
positively on
them (no one
did)
"we
were asked
about
reporting by
the African
Union–UN
Mission on
developments
in Darfur.
UNAMID notes
that it
reports
verified
information on
the situation
in Darfur to
the United
Nations and to
the African
Union on a
daily basis.
This
information is
then made
public in the
Secretary-General’s
quarterly
reports to the
Security
Council and,
as the
situation
warrants, in
press
statements."
To a
casual or
ill-informed
listener, it
sounded like a
legitimate
answer. But as
the UN and its
Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations
under Herve
Ladsous know,
this was part
of Aicha
Elbasri's
critique, even
then:
"On 24
April I
resigned from
UNAMID and
wrote my
end-of-mission
report
requesting the
Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations to
look into
UNAMID’s
violations of
the UN Public
Information
policy which
calls for
open,
transparent
and honest
information-sharing
with the
media. I
didn't receive
any response.
On past
August, I
requested the
UN Office of
Internal
Oversight
Services to
open an
investigation
into the
matter. The
information I
shared with
them should
have made
anyone who
cares about
the people of
Darfur and the
UN values and
policies jump,
call me and
take a quick
action. What I
received so
far is a
deafening
silence. And I
can no longer
wait, because
every day that
goes by, more
men, women and
children die
in Darfur in
total impunity
and
invisibility.
So today I
will break the
UN code of
conduct and
share with you
some
confidential
photos and
information
that show the
African Union,
the United
Nations and
UNAMID’
conspiracy of
silence."
Surely
Ladsous' DPKO
(and Carman
Lapointe's
OIOS) knew
what Aicha
Elbasri
submitted. But
the public
response was
as set forth
above. Now,
will the
publication of
these leaks,
in a non
Ladsous
protective way
by Radio
Dabanga,
finally help
bring
accountability?
We'll be
following
this. Watch
this site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|