FEDERAL COURT,
Sept 30 --
Months after
the DC
Circuit's
decision in US
v. Munchel, on September
30 DDC Judge Christopher
R. Cooper
had before him
Capitol breach
defendant EDUARDO
NICOLAS ALVEAR
GONZALEZ, who
came to
plead guilty
to one count
of parading in
the Capitol.
Inner City
Press live
tweeted it here,
podcast here
(with GPS
issue)
EDUARDO
NICOLAS ALVEAR
GONZALEZ,
there's a
change of
pleas
scheduled
before DDC
Judge Cooper.
This while
DOJ's videos
in US v.
Padilla etc
are still
withheld.
Inner City
Press has
requested
Judge
Cooper: This
is your plea
hearing. I'll
review the
rights you
will be giving
up. Where were
you born?
Gonzalez:
Caracas,
Venezuela.
Judge Cooper:
Did you say
Minnesota?
Gonzalez: No,
Venezuela.
Gonzalez:
I studied
psychology,
film making
and
horticulture.
Judge
Cooper: Any
drugs?
Gonzalez:
No.
AUSA:
At 2:30 pm on
January 6 Mr
Gonzalez was
unlawfully on
the Capitol
Grounds and
entered the
Rotunda to
2:47... He
knew he did
not have
permission.
Judge
Cooper: What
is your plea?
Gonzalez: I
plead guilty
to the one
count,
parading in
the
Capitol.
Judge Cooper:
Sentencing
January 5 at
10 am.
[Not
a year and a
day, but a
year MINUS a
day. ]
Then
Judge Cooper
denied
Gonzalez'
motion to have
GPS monitor
removed.
Podcast here.
Meanwhile, still no videos that DOJ
used in
US v. Padilla. We'll have more on this.
On Kenneth
Harrelson on
August 5,
Inner City
Press filed a
letter and
motion with
Judge Mehta, on
its
DocumentCloud
here.
On August
16, this:
"Judge Mehta
is in receipt
of your email
requesting
access to the
videos filed
in United
States v.
Harrelson, No.
21-cr-28-10.
Under Standing
Order No.
21-28, in
order for the
court to grant
Inner City
Press access
to the videos
filed in Mr.
Harrelson’s
case, you will
need to file
an application
for access
pursuant to
D.D.C. Local
Criminal Rule
57.6."
That rule provides:
"Any news
organization
or other
interested
person, other
than a party
or a
subpoenaed
witness, who
seeks relief
relating to
any aspect of
proceedings in
a criminal
case... shall
file an
application
for such
relief with
the Court. The
application
shall include
a statement of
the
applicant's
interest in
the matter as
to which
relief is
sought, a
statement of
facts, and a
specific
prayer for
relief."
So,
citing the
Rule, Inner
City Press
filed another
letter, one page,
docketed
here
Now on
August
19, it's been
granted (shouldn't
have been
necessary):
"MINUTE ORDER
as to KENNETH
HARRELSON (10)
granting Inner
City Press's
343
Application
for Access to
Video
Exhibits. The
United States
shall make
available to
Inner City
Press the
video exhibits
entered into
evidence
during the
detention
hearing of
KENNETH
HARRELSON
(10),
consistent
with the
procedures set
forth in
Standing Order
21-28. Inner
City Press is
granted
permission to
record, copy,
download,
retransmit,
and otherwise
further
publish these
video
exhibits.
Signed by
Judge Amit P.
Mehta on
8/19/2021."
So now,
immediately,
put on Inner
City Press'
YouTube, video here
Similarly,
Inner
City Press
asked DOJ and
then Judge
Timothy Kelly
for access to
the videos
that DOJ had
shown to the
court in the
case: judicial
documents
that, under
case law, must
be made
available to
the public. But
it was denied
access, on the
theory that
Judge Kelly's
order earlier
in the month
limited access
to these judicial
documents to a
particular
sub-set of the
public.
Inner
City Press on
July 27 wrote
to Judge
Kelly,
including in
the form of a
motion, now on DocumentCloud, here.
By noon the
next day, July
28, nothing -
no responses,
no response.
We'll
have more on
this. For now,
podcast here;
music video here.
Inner
City Press
live tweeted
Riley June
Williams on
January 25, here.
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com