In Jan 6
Case Richard Barnett Trial Recedes, April
12 Next After Feet Up In Pelosi
Office
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
Podcast Song
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
FEDERAL COURT,
Feb 1 – Back on April
27, 2021 more
and a months
after the DC
Circuit's
decision in US
v. Munchel,
there was a detention
challenge by
Richard
Barnett, who
put his legs
up on a desk
in Nancy
Pelosi's
office. Song here.
Inner
City Press
live tweeted here and
below.
On
August 28,
another
proceeding, in which
Barnett's
lawyer said his tour
of the Capitol
excluded a
"relevant"
area, and the
Assistant US Attorney
said that may
not be
possible - visiting Nancy Pelosi's
(assistant's)
office where
Barrnet put
his feet up.
Inner City
Press live
tweeted it here
(podcast here)
On February 1,
2022,
there was
still no trial
date. There
was a
proceeding
before Judge Cooper,
with another
set for April
12. Inner
City Press
live tweeted,
here:
Assistant
US Attorney:
There is
plenty of
discovery for
the defense to
review, more
will be
produced
before a bench
trial in a
Capitol case
in April.
Defense
counsel: They
are
power-washing
my windows, so
pardon the
noise. I'm not
comfortable
setting a
trial date
Inner City
Press
@innercitypress
·
Judge
Cooper: I told
you to come
back today
with some
thing
concrete, or
with a trial
date. You've
know for quite
some time.
This is an
important
matter, under
indictment for
a year. I'm
not going out
to winter, it
won't be 2
years from Jan
6 Inner City
Press
@innercitypress
·
Judge
Cooper: I was
prepared to
offer dates in
July or
August. I'd
like to pick
one of them.
Counsel can
file a motion
about their
own trials and
the judges
involved.
Inner City
Press
@innercitypress
·
Judge
Cooper: Next
conference
April 12 at 2
pm, with time
excluded under
the Speedy
Trial
Act.
Adjourned.
From August 28: Now
Jan 6 case of
US v. Barnett
/ Biggo. AUSA
says
"thousands"
involved on
Jan 6, cites
Deloitte
database &
says will have
more info in
the future, as
DOJ withholds
Josh James
video, see here.
Barnett's
lawyer:
Because he is
at home, we
can accept
excluding time
under the
Speedy Trial
Act. I do have
one additional
request: we
had our
attorney
walk-through
of the Capitol
but some areas
were not
accessible to
us. We need a
second tour
Assistant
US Attorney: I
don't have
ready a
fulsome answer
to that
question right
now, today.
We're talking
about an area
with certain
private rooms
that the US
Attorney's
Office does
not have
control over.
I don't know
if they'll
even be
available
Judge
Cooper: If you
all can't come
to ground on
those issues,
file a motion.
If we're not
going to see
you folks for
60 days, let's
try to get a
report on
file. Let's do
90 days - Nov
23 at 1 pm
Back on
April 27: Judge
Cooper: I
suspect the
government is
going to make
a plea
offer... I
don't know
what his
sentencing
guidelines
would be. His
detention
could coincide
with the
guidelines.
Isn't there a
need to move
more
expeditiously,
since he's
detained?
AUSA:
We have had
discussions
with the
defense. We
had done some
calculations
of the
guidelines.
Judge: Has the
government
extended a
plea offer?
AUSA: I
don't have the
authority to
do so. I have
only discussed
the
guidelines.
Judge: The
defense wants
bond review
Judge
Cooper: This
is rather
unique.
Usually I
review a
Magistrate's
decision de
novo. But here
it was a
determination
of Chief
Justice
Howell. So
what's the
standard of
review?
AUSA: I
can't speak to
the standard.
Judge Cooper:
I don't
understand the
defense's
argument that
January 6 was
a protest by
the working
poor against
the American
elites, that
is was on par
with Black
Lives Matter.
I'm confused.
I thought it
was a protest
to overturn
stolen
election
results
Barnett's
lawyer: The
notion of
protest is
that people
gather to
voice their
displeasure.
2020 into 2021
was unique.
There were a
litany of
protests all
the time.
Judge Cooper:
How is that
relevant?
Barnett's
lawyer: There
was violence
in
Minneapolis.
And NYC.
Barnett's
lawyer: Courts
have generally
released
protesters.
[Alludes to
NY-
firebombing of
empty NYPD
car, Inner
City Press
covered that
too]
Judge
Cooper: Your
papers
referred to
1960s radicals
too. That's
not helpful.
Please focus.
Barnett's
lawyer:
Understood.
Barnett's
lawyer: What
he had was a
walking stick.
But no
evidence of
prior
planning. The
US Attorney's
Office tries
to manipulate
lawful
Arkansas
conduct into a
plan. But
there is no
manifesto
Barnett's
lawyer: OK
it was a stun
gun walking
stick. But it
was disarmed
the night
before. Judge
Cooper:
Where's the
evidence of
that?
Barnett's
lawyer: I am
representing
that he took
the batteries
out. And video
shows that
when the light
is on, it is
charged up
Barnett's
lawyer: He was
60 years old,
swept up in a
throng. Judge
Cooper: The
statute says
whoever
knowingly
enters or
remains in a
restricted
building. Even
if he was just
sucked in, no
one forced him
to stay there,
did they?
Barnett's
lawyer: We
concede that.
Judge
Cooper: The
government
says he is an
adherent of
QAnon, they
found slogans
in his home.
He has taken
up arms -
albeit legally
it would
appear - for
the Save the
Children
movement,
associated in
some way with
Q-Anon
Barnett's
lawyer: He has
eight acres.
He has a First
Amendment
right - and
the Second
Amendment too.
It's not
indicative of
anything more.
The sanctity
of his home.
Judge Cooper:
We're talking
about
predictions of
risk.
Protected
speech could
indicate risk.
[Hmm]
Inner
City Press
@innercitypress
· 43m Judge
Cooper: What
if he was
talking about
cop killing?
[Inner City
Press reports
on this, with
skepticism, in
SDNY detention
proceedings
where hip hop
lyrics are
used.]
AUSA:
He brought out
volatile
conditions on
his property.
Very young
people with
very big guns.
AUSA:
He covered his
face and
turned off
location
services on
his
devices.
Judge Cooper:
That's
consciousness
of guilt. But
how does it go
to danger?
AUSA: He is
willing to die
in pursuit of
the war he is
waging against
domestic
enemies
AUSA:
His guns are
out of the
house, at a
friend's, but
we can't tell
whose are
whose. Judge
Cooper:
There's the
Munchel
decision.
AUSA: Munchel
didn't pose
for
photographers
and speak
disrespectfully
in a member of
Congress'
office.
Judge
Cooper: While
provocative
and impudent,
does the
government
concede Mr.
Barnett's
carrying [in a
past incident]
was legal
under Arkansas
law?
AUSA:
We don't
concede that.
Two civilians
saw the need
to call and
report his
behavior.
[Hmm]
AUSA:
He left a note
for a member
of Congress.
Then he took
to a bullpen
to rile up a
crowd. Judge
Cooper: What
does that
show, that
he's a wannabe
leader? AUSA:
The crowd
cheered. He is
cultivating
influence
wherever he
can get it.
AUSA:
I'd be happy
to play the
exhibit I sent
in. [Are these
all even made
public by DOJ?
We've asked
Judge Cooper.
Judge Cooper:
I don't see
the need to
receive them
here in court.
[But they are
still judicial
documents]
OK -
now after
Judge Cooper
"locked the
conference"
he's back.
"January 6
caused the
death of 5
people... But
the DC Circuit
has instructed
that cannot be
considered on
individual
defendants.
Munchel is
binding on
this court.
Judge
Cooper: He
adheres to
QAnon. He has
carried arms
in a
provocative
manner,
perhaps
legally. The
concern is
this could
lead to a
Pizzagate
situation. But
I cannot
articulate
anything
concrete. My
view of the
video is he
remains in the
Capitol with a
stun gun
Judge
Cooper: I've
read Munchel
several times.
They are very
much like Mr.
Barnett. One
had a taser
and zip ties,
but did not
use them.
Barnett left
offensive
notes - make
no mistake,
they were
offensive,
regardless of
what words he
actually used.
Judge
Cooper: The
Munchel
defendants
also told the
crowd to go
in. There was
no advance
planning, and
Barnett had no
real powers.
Judge
Cooper: The
Court is
prepared to
grant the
order [of
release] with
conditions, no
travel outside
of 50 miles
without
approval, no
contact with
anyone
associated in
any way with
January 6, no
weapons
including stun
guns.
Judge
Cooper: We
will transfer
to the Western
District of
Arkansas.
Pre-Trial
Services: Stay
out of DC,
too.
We will
have more on
this.
Inner
City Press
live tweeted
Riley June
Williams on
January 25, here.
From January
22, song here:
Thread here.
Inner City
Press' John Earle Sullivan
song on SoundCloud here.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|