In Jan 6 Case Langeurand
Wants Out of Jail But US Cites Brass Knuckles
and Drugs
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
Podcast Song
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
FEDERAL COURT,
August 5 --
On August
5,
months
after the DC
Circuit's
decision in US
v. Munchel, DDC Judge John D.
Bates
had before him
Capitol breach
defendant Nicholas
Langeurand,
seeking
release from
pre-trial
detention.
Inner City
Press live
tweeted it here
(podcast
here)
Languerand's
lawyer: My
client has
grandparents
in South
Carolina who
would have
him.
Judge
Bates: Didn't
he live in
Vermont? What
are his roots
in South
Carolina?
Defense:
His
grandparents
moved and
asked him to
come down once
he lost his
job. He's a
hard worker
Languerand's
lawyer: He
digs footings
for
foundations,
his former
boss would
love him back.
The risks to
the public
could be
addressed by
turning in the
weapons that
the government
discovered -
and did not
seized, mind
you. He could
be on a
curfew.
Judge
Bates: Are you
contesting
anything that
the government
is putting
forth by
proffer, what
they say Mr.
Langeurand
said or his
activities on
January 6?
Defense: For
purpose of
this hearing,
I won't
contest that
seizing.
Defense: He
did not
personally
injure anyone.
He threw
things.
Judge
Bates: If a
person were to
throw a rock
at a police
officer and
missed, it
would still be
serious. What
about past
incidents the
US says Mr.
Languerand was
involved in?
Defense: No
convictions
Defense:
Maybe he needs
some
attention. Not
all attention
needs to be
detention.
Perhaps they
are using or
abusing drugs
or alcohol.
Pre-Trial
Services can
address
it.
Judge Bates:
Thank you.
Government?
AUSA: We've
set for the
reasons under
Chrestman.
AUSA:
This is a case
based on video
submitted to
the court,
Exhibit 1A and
1B. [Inner
City Press:
Are these
fully publicly
available
yet?]
Judge
Bates: What's
the basis of
calling him a
leader? AUSA:
He was on the
front line of
rioters, in
the face of
officers.
Judge
Bates: Did he
says, "Come
on, guys?"
AUSA: He did
not hang
back... In the
Army, with his
drug problem,
he was unable
to comply with
rules or
regulations.
So it does not
bode
well.
Judge Bates:
So he's a
danger? Or not
comply with
conditions?
AUSA:
There were
drugs in his
apartment. We
assume his
grandparents
didn't know,
but there was
no control.
Judge Bates:
Let's talk
danger, and
Munchel. We
need to look
forward and
find a danger
that is clear
and convincing
and is in the
future.
AUSA:
His social
media postings
after January
6 said the
violence was
justified. So
the risk
continues. And
he has few
ties to South
Carolina.
Judge Bates:
Why weren't
the guns
seized? AUSA:
They were
legal, he has
no
convictions.
But he also
had brass
knuckles
AUSA:
There's also
the order of
protection.
Look at the
record. That
no one was
hurt was a
miracle. This
is the kind of
person that
keeps slipping
through the
cracks until
something
horrible
happens. On
January 6
something
horrible did
happen.
AUSA:
The media in
Vermont said
when people
looked up his
social media.
they got
scared. He
said to the
police, I
don't give an
F... If you
shoot my dog,
I'll shoot
you. He
attacked riot
gear attired
police. On Jan
6 he didn't
have weapons,
but used
sticks
AUSA:
He used a big
orange prism
shaped object.
We're sure his
grandparents
love him, but
it didn't
prevent his
conduct on Jan
6. Defense:
The US
submitted a
Vermont
protective
order - it was
never
violated, in
the year it
was in effect.
Judge
Bates: On
discovery, I
encourage the
government to
turn over
every rock to
find video
about the
defendant.
With respect
to Deloitte, I
like other
judges am
concerned at
how long it is
taking. Please
speed up.
There may come
a time we have
to deal with
it.
Defense:
In the next
months I have
to jury
trials. Even
if I had a
plea offer,
he's housed
more than two
hours from the
courthouse. So
60 days would
be reasonable.
Judge
Bates: I'm
jammed up in
early October.
So in the area
of the 14th.
How about 10
am?
Judge
Bates: I'll
exclude time
under the
Speedy Trial
Act until
October 14.
I'll promptly
get out a
decision on
detention, in
the next
couple of
days.
Adjourned.
Inner City
Press has
asked DOJ for
the videos in
US v. Harrelson, a case
before Judge Amit
P. Mehta -
but does not
(yet?) have
them. We'll
have more on
this. For now,
podcast here;
music video here.
Inner
City Press
live tweeted
Riley June
Williams on
January 25, here.
From January
22, song here:
Thread here.
Inner City
Press' John Earle Sullivan
song on SoundCloud here.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|