Before
Chagos Vote in UNGA Banned
Inner City Press Asks Guterres
About UK Relinquishing Control
By Matthew
Russell Lee, New
Platform
UNITED NATIONS,
May 22 –
In the UN, even as restricted
by colonial Portuguese censor
UNSG Antonio Guterres, most
decolonization fights are in
the Fourth Committee or C-24.
But Mauritius on 22 June 2017
got a UN General Assembly vote
to seek an advisory opinion of
the International Court of
Justice on the dismemberment
of the Chagos Archipelago by
the United Kingdom in 1965.
The resolution was approved,
on which Inner City Press
before it was roughed up and
banned now 322 by Guterres
first reported from in front
of the GA, passed by 94 yes,
15 no with 64 abstaining.
(Voting list here,
on Patreon).
Now even
banned from any entry of the
UN by Guterres who tries to
conceal his financial links to
P5 powers like China and its
CEFC China Energy, through
Gulbenkian Foundation whose
payments to Guterres went
undisclosed in his form
covering 2016 (and has other
undisclosed colonial
business interests through his
son Pedro Guimarães e Melo De
Oliveira Guterres in Lusophone
Africa and Timor, Inner City
Press has asked in writing,
"on colonialism and the P5,
please immediately state the
SG's position on calls for the
UK to relinquish control over
the Chagos Islands."
Back on 19 June 2017, a photo
exhibit is in the UN
Secretariat Lobby (along with
a sign that this is not an
endorsement by the UN).
Tweeted photo here.
Mauritius' “Aide
Memoire” obtained by Inner
City Press had a more than two
page section entitled “Actions
taken by the UK in violation
of international law.” It
recounts how the agenda item
was put on the agenda of the
71st session of the General
Assembly “on the understanding
that it would not be
considered before June 2017
and that thereafter it may be
considered upon notification
by a Member State.” It
concludes that Mauritius will
be submitting a draft
resolution, and “would be
grateful for the support of
all Member States in its
endeavor.” Inner City Press tweet
of pages 1-4; 5
to 8 (end).
On June 1
as Inner City Press staked-out
of the General Assembly
meeting, even with the
still-required UN Department
of Public Information minder,
one well-placed state's
Permanent Representative told
it “there probably will be a
vote.” Another, while
sympathetic to Mauritius (or
anti-UK), said it might set a
tricky precedent for other
states. We'll have more on
this.
The
day before on May 31 when the
UN General Assembly's incoming
President Miroslav Lajcak came
to take questions in from the
GA Hall, Inner City Press
asked him as the last question
about the bribery case
involving former PGA John
Ashe, and whether he would
commit to disclose who pays
for his travel and his staff,
and try to codify this in a GA
resolution during his year. Video
here. Lajcak to his
credit stayed and took the
question, ending with “There
will be no secrets.” If so,
that will be rare in today's
UN, where basic questions
about who is paying who, which
staff are seconded, go
unanswered. Other questions to
Lajcak were about US President
Donald Trump. When the UN
Security Council's 15 members
traveled to Washington on
April 24 for lunch with US
President Donald Trump, NBC
News' Andrea Mitchell in one
of many curtain-raisers reported
that only the Permanent
Members ever chair the Council
(false) and that the Elected
Ten cannot vote (also false).
Trump in five minutes of
remarks now online here
chided the Council for
inaction on Syria, called for
action on North Korea and
hoped for cost savings and,
more importantly, better
performance. In one step for
UN reform and transparency, a
resolution was adopted on
April 19 to henceforth webcast
to the public the UN Committee
on Non-Governmental
Organizations, which Inner
City Press has
covered and critiqued
for some time. Inner City
Press notes that a similar,
even more basic reform is
needed: due
process rules for
journalists at the UN, where
currently there are none. As
to the NGO webcasting, US
Ambassador Nikki Haley on
April 19 said, “Today's vote
will bring increased
transparency and
accountability to the United
Nations. Now all of these
meetings and votes will be
open for the world to see.
This major win at that will
greatly assist organizations
that stand up to oppressive
governments around the world.”
We agree: see below. But when
will the needed reforms - any
reforms - for content neutral
accreditation of media at the
UN, and due process of some
sort before UN censors can
throw the Press, happen? After
the UN Department of Public
Information gave Inner City
Press two hours to leave, for
having covered an event in the
UN Press Briefing Room related
to the Ng Lap Seng UN
corruption case, there has
been no appeals process.
Pro-UN media only recently
arrived have been given office
space; Inner City Press' long
time shared office is being
given to an Egyptian state
media Akhbar al Yom whose
correspondent Sanaa Youssef
rarely comes in and never asks
questions. For fifteen months
and for now ongoing, Inner
City Press is required to have
UN minders to cover events on
the Conference Building's
second floor, unlike other
media. It is lawless
censorship and must be
addressed.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past (and future?)
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2017 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|
,
