US
& UK on
Diego Garcia
In UN
Disarmament's
Evening, Saudi
Sushi
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
October 23 --
Wednesday was
Disarmament
Night in and
across
from the UN,
with the Latin
American
nuclear free
zone of the
Treaty
of Tlatelolco
collecting its
award,
complete with
classical
music,
sushi and four
kinds of beer.
When the award
was announced,
the Free
UN
Coalition for
Access
pressed to
that questions
be allowed:
for
example on
nuclear UK's
use of the
Malvinas
Islands.
Wednesday
night
diplomats
approached
Inner City
Press on both
sides of First
Avenue with
their own
tales of abuse
by the UK and
US, on the
African
nuclear free
zone or Treaty
of Pelindaba.
It
is
diplomatically
stated that
"the status of
the Indian
Ocean
island of
Diego Garcia,
controlled by
the United
Kingdom and
used as
a military
base by the
United States,
with regard to
the Treaty is
unclear."
UNclear?
If
the US and UK
are so high
and mighty on
nuclear
proliferation,
why
not just
commit to not
landing there?
Fueled by
finger food
and
liquor, an
African
diplomat told
Inner City
Press neither
country
wants to say
which of its
ships are
nuclear. "It's
absurd,"
he said. In
the UN's First
Committee,
this is heard
at much, much
length.
Inner
City Press has
been following
the end of
session rights
of reply in
the First
Committee,
usually
involving
North Korea
taking on
South
Korea or
Japan. North
Korea wins
many of these
skirmishes:
their
speaker is
articulate and
sassy, for
example asking
South Korea to
"talk to its
master" -- the
United States
-- if it has
the
courage, or
ask another to
do it.
In
the time
allotted after
6 pm, Inner
City Press has
been
live-tweeting
these
exchanges, and
getting
responses.
Some agree the
North Koreans
are well
trained, and
others don't.
There's talk
of the South
Korean
mission
melting down
last year at
how they were
losing the
exchanges,
and of a
trash-talk
school.
Down
at the
disarmament
award
reception on
the UN's first
floor
Wednesday
night, talk
turned to the
Nuclear Free
Middle East
proposals, and
Saudi Arabia's
renunciation
of a Security
Council seat.
Was it about
Israel, on
this, or Iran?
The consensus
was Iran. And
we'll have
more
on that
tomorrow.
Watch this
site.