Sudan
Meeting
of Security Council Postponed Amid Addis Ababa Confusion, S. Kordofan
Pull Out UNcommented On
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
June 13 -- The UN Security Council postponed its June 10
meeting about Sudan and Abyei to the afternoon of June 13, in order
to watch the weekend
meetings in Addis Ababa between Khartoum's Omar
al Bashir and Juba's Salva Kiir. But then the June 13 meeting was
also postponed.
US
Ambassador
Susan Rice tweeted, “UN Security Council watching closely ongoing
negotiations on Sudan in Addis. We will meet when we can assess the
outcome... SAF must immediately end fighting and abuses in Kadugli
and withdraw unconditionally from Abyei.”
Wire
services
were already reporting an agreement on Abyei, for the Sudanese Armed
Forces (SAF) to withdraw and Ethiopian peacekeepers to go in. But
sources in Addis were saying it wasn't really done, that conditions
were being set.
The
stated
purpose of the open Security Council meeting postponed from Monday
was to have each Council member publicly make clear their position.
But what about their positions on the UN's own performance?
Inner
City Press replied to @AmbassadorRice, “The only withdrawing seems
to be by UN from Kadugli. What does the US Mission to the UN think of
UNMIS performance there?” So far there's been no answer.
Susan Rice & French DPR in Rajaf, action on UN
Kadugli pull out not shown
Here
was the
question as put to Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Martin
Nesirky on Monday at noon:
Inner
City
Press: can you confirm that UN staff are being pulled out of
South Kordofan? And do you have any response to the allegations by
their top SPLM [Sudan People’s Liberation Movement] official in
South Kordofan, Al-Hilu, and his spokesmen that Egyptian peacekeepers
committed rape in South Sudan and that they turned over people to the
Sudanese Armed Forces who were later killed?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
Well, on that very last point, allegations that UNMIS has
abandoned — there were reports that we’ve seen refer to one
national staff member and allegations about the UN Mission in Sudan
having abandoned a national staff member who was killed, are simply
completely false and baseless. The Mission will continue to provide
all the protection needed to all the staff, regardless of their
ethnic, religious or political affiliations. And just to be clear,
UNMIS is not evacuating its personnel from Kadugli. However, the
Mission started relocating civilian staff as of today to Khartoum,
including nationals, because they can’t operate in the current
circumstances. And an UNMIS convoy under the escort of Egyptian
peacekeepers was able to reach El-Obeid with its nonessential
international staff. And also, I can tell you that the Mission has
extracted the majority of its national staff from town, and they are
now safe in the Mission compound receiving the necessary assistance.
Question:
No, no, and thanks for that. I was saying, in this Sudan Tribune,
certainly over the weekend, maybe even as much as 24 hours ago, there
are these
quotes by Al-Hilu, who is the one who ran against Ahmed
Haroun --
Spokesperson:
I heard what you said, and what I have responded is the answer that
I have. Okay?
Question:
But they seem to be alleging different things?
Spokesperson:
Well, as I have said, we sought to have guidance from the UN Mission
in Sudan, and they have given as very clear guidance on what is
actually happening.
Question:
And one more thing on Sudan, there is… the SPLM
has said that the
territory of South Sudan has been bombed from the air by Khartoum
using Antonov aircraft; Jau in Unity State. Is that something that
UNMIS has been able to verify or deny?
Spokesperson:
Well, it wouldn’t be for us to deny, I think. But to try to
verify is another matter. I don’t have anything on that at the
moment, but we’re certainly aware of the reports. If my colleagues
have anything further, I am sure that we would be able to provide
that.
More
than four
hours later, no information had been provided. Watch this site.
, 
