By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
February 1 --
The full
extent to
which the
current UN may
be
a faceless
bureaucracy
that cannot
reform itself
is on display
in the
belated
answers to
questions
raised on
January 17 by
the new Free
UN
Coalition for
Access.
The
also new chief
of the UN
Department of
Public
Information,
Peter
Launsky-Tieffenthal,
had repeatedly
asked to meet
with FUNCA in
response to
issues it
raised in
e-mails to him
beginning in
December.
These
issues ranged
from due
process for
journalists
when a
government,
official or
other media
files a
complaint
against them
through the
duty of UN
officials to take and
answer answers
to the need
for the
UN to allow an
open
democratic
space for a
group beyond
the UN
Correspondents
Association,
a/k/a the UN's
Censorship
Alliance.
In
2012,
according to
documents
Inner City
Press has
obtained from
Voice
of America
under the US
Freedom of
Information
Act, UNCA
"met
with UN
officials
(very
quietly)"
to seek the
expulsion of
Inner
City Press.
Soon
thereafter,
VOA which said
it had the
support of Reuters
bureau chief
Louis
Charbonneau
and Agence
France Presse's
Tim
Witcher, filed a
complaint with
UN official
Stephane
Dujarric seeking
the "review"
of Inner City
Press'
accreditation.
Dujarric
thanked
VOA's Steve
Redisch and
promised to
call him later
in the
week. But
Dujarric never
informed Inner
City Press
about the
dis-accreditation
request.
It
was this that
led the New
York Civil
Liberties
Union to
publicly ask
DPI Under
Secretary
General
Launsky-Tieffenthal
to state the
UN's
content
neutral
policies for
accreditation
and for due
process on any
complaints
received.
Launsky-Tieffenthal
never
answered this
request: the
NYCLU has told
Inner City
Press it
received a
short (and
unsatisfactory)
letter from
Maher Nasser,
the charge
d'affaires
at the time,
and a cursory
cell phone
call from
Dujarric. No
due process
rules were
disclosed. The
question
remained,
and remains,
outstanding.
While
it was
Launsky-Tieffenthal
who requested
the January 17
meeting with
FUNCA, once
there on the
UN's 10th
floor it was
Dujarric who
answered
on most
issues.
Dujarric said,
in essence,
that FUNCA
should disband
and
"work with
UNCA." That is
not going to
happened, not
least
because of the
dis-accreditation
attempts and
now refusal to
allow
any democratic
space.
At the
meeting,
Dujarric said
that the day
after FUNCA's
complaint
about Under
Secretary
General for
Peacekeeping
Herve Ladsous
directing his
spokesman to
seize the UNTV
microphone
to avoid an
Inner City
Press question
about 126
rapes by the
UN's partners
in the
Congolese
Army, he told
the spokesman
it was wrong.
But Dujarric
never told
anyone else,
and has
refused to put
it in writing.
This UN cannot
reform: it
only covers
up.
After
the January 17
meeting, it
was Dujarric
and not
Launsky-Tieffenthal
who sent
some
cursory
written
answers.
FUNCA
reiterated the
outstanding
issues, also
stating with
all due
respect that
Dujarric given
his
role in the
Voice of
America and
UNCA
complaints was
and is not the
right
interlocutor,
in UN-ese.
There are more
connections,
left out, in
good UN form.
Dujarric's
response was
to ask that
question that
had already
been handed
over as a page
and a half
flyer
on January 17
asked be sent
again,
electronically.
They were.
In
the meantime,
the UN's or at
least
Dujarric's
partners in
UNCA began
tearing down
flyers posted
by FUNCA.
This is
thuggish
behavior,
given that
UNCA has its
own glassed in
bulletin board
on which for
months in 2012
they posted a
five page
letter
denouncing
Inner City
Press.
FUNCA
wrote to
Launsky-Tieffenthal
about the
bulletin board
problem,
twice, and
raised it
again in
person.
But no
response was
received;
rather first one Media
Accreditation
&
Liaison Unit
staffer
then other
sent a copy of
an inapplicable
flyer
policy that
applies to
invitations to
events by
Permanent
Missions or
UN Departments.
The second
message noted
that
correspondents
can post
flyers on the
doors to their
cubicles.
On
January 31,
after ten days
of silence and
inaction by
DPI, the UNCA
"leaders" tore
the FUNCA
flyers even
off Inner City
Press'
cubicle door.
Also
that week,
UNCA's
"leaders"
created an
anonymous fake
Twitter
account to try
to undermine
both FUNCA and
Inner City
Press. Click
here for
that story; UN
DPI is aware
of these acts
by its
partner, its
UN Censorship
Alliance.
The UNCA
"leaders" made
spurious
allegations,
as they had
tried in 2012,
of terrorist
funding --
even
as they and
even their Dag
program for
young
journalists
are funded
by, among
others, the
Italian oil
company ENI.
These are the
UN's
partners.
On
the afternoon
of Friday,
February 1
some even more
bureaucratic
and non-responsive
answers were
sent by
Dujarric,
along with a
request
that they be
published in
full. Read
them and weep
-- at what the
UN
has become.
Where
do things
stand? FUNCA
will continue
to push
forward. Some
continue
to say that
Launsky-Tieffenthal
might think in
a new and
fresh way,
and not simply
be captured.
Rather
desperately,
the new
president of
UNCA on
January 31
went to a
normal noon
briefing and
made a point
of
telling the
Deputy
Spokesperson,
the only one
on the podium,
"on
behalf of
UNCA, thank
you for being
here." Video
here, at
Minute 5:29.
There
was more than
a little
laughter in
the room.
Inner City
Press for
FUNCA thanks
the deputy
spokesman
Eduardo Del
Buey as well,
"for
all you do,"
then asked
questions. Had
it seem
Dujarric's
non-responsive
answers it
would have
asked more
pointedly.
Here
are those
"answers," in
full, with
FUNCA's
responses
marked and in
bold:
Subject:
Answers
From: Stephane
Dujarric [at]
UN.org
Date: Fri, Feb
1,
2013 at 3:18
PM
To: Matthew
Russell Lee
[at]
innercitypress.com
Cc:
funca@funca.info
Dear
Matthew,
Further
to
our response
to you of 23
Jan, I wanted
to come back
to you on
your
questions.
On
the issue of
your
suggestion of
the
withholding of
white P passes
to
long-time
correspondents,
these
accreditation
badges are
provided to
UN Resident
Correspondents,
as per the
Renewal of
Accreditation
guidelines on
the UN media
accreditation
website.
FUNCA:
This totally
ignores the
point FUNCA
has been
raising since
December
2012 -- that
for example a
photographer
who's covered
the UN for
twenty years
still has a
"Green" P pass
and has to go
through metal
detectors --
and can't
enter the
Delegates'
Lounger,
according to
UNCA -- while
any
photographer
who work for
example for
AFP gets a
white P, since
AFP has an
office.
UNfair.
Regarding
the
issue of
encouraging
senior
officials to
speak to the
media, DPI
has
consistently
encouraged UN
officials to
speak to the
media when
appropriate
and is
providing more
opportunities
for briefings
for UN
correspondents,
including
through live
briefings from
field
situations.
FUNCA:
This totally
ignores both
the request
that DPI tell
Under
Secretaries
General to
hold press
conference,
and the
specific
complaint that
USG
Herve Ladsous
refuses to
answer Press
questions and
told his
spokesman to
seize the UNTV
microphone on
December 18,
2012. Dujarric
claims to have
told the DPKO
spokesman it
was wrong, but
he didn't
tell UNTV
staff and
won't put it
in writing.
UNreal.
With
regard to the
assignment of
office space,
DPI continues
to review and
revise the
allocation of
rent-free
office space
to media
outlets, in
consultation
with
journalists
and the CMP.
Our aim is to
accommodate as
many outlets
as possible in
the limited
office space
that is
available.
FUNCA:
Among the
issues raised
is unfair
treatment of
media based on
where
in the world
they are from,
and a specific
question about
State
Department
affiliates
like Voice of
America
getting three
separate
offices at the
UN. And yet
limited space
is slated to
be given to an
"UNCA Club,
"UNCA Office"
(at least
half) and even
an
"UNCA Pantry."
The
Media
Guidelines for
UN
Headquarters
in New York
are
established by
DPI. The
specific
guidelines on
media access
at UNHQ
contained in
the
Media
Guidelines
represent an
agreement by
DPI, the UN
Department of
Safety and
Security, the
Office of the
Spokesperson
of the
Secretary-General,
UNCA and the
Office of the
President of
the
General
Assembly.
FUNCA:
What is the
basis of
having as a
party a
purportedly
private group,
UNCA, which
doesn't
represent all
journalists at
the UN and has
moved
to get even
its own
members thrown
out? Now, the
UNCA "leaders"
have created a
fake Twitter
account to
accuse other
corresponents
of
being funded
by terrorists.
UNsustainable.
DPI
has consulted
UNCA on
questions
related to
media access
to ensure
that the needs
of journalists
are considered
and reflected
in these
arrangements,
which seek to
facilitate the
work of
journalists in
covering UN
activities to
the greatest
extent
possible. DPI
is always
open to the
views and
needs of all
in-house
correspondents
on these
issues. DPI
has, and will
continue, to
provide all
in-house
correspondents
with
up-to-date
information on
issues related
to media
access.
The
granting of
the first
question in
press
briefings to
UNCA, when an
UNCA
representative
is present, is
a tradition in
recognition of
the
establishment
of UNCA soon
after the
creation of
the United
Nations.
FUNCA:
Again, UNCA
does not
represent all
journalists at
the UN,
attacks
some, does not
ask good or
even
interesting
questions (!),
and UNCA
"leaders" have
created a fake
Twitter
account to
accuse
other
corresponents
of being
funded by
terrorists.
UNacceptable.
With
regard to
access to open
segments of
informal
meetings of
the General
Assembly that
take place in
the North Lawn
Building, DPI
is
discussing
arrangements
for access
with the
Office of the
President
of the General
Assembly and
will inform
all
correspondents
about the
future
arrangements.
At the same
time, open
segments of
informal
meetings of
the General
Assembly are
available on
the live UN
webcast.
The
UN live
webcast is
available on
any platform
that supports
flash
video. Owing
to technical
issues that we
working to
resolve, only
some of the
live meetings
are viewable
on iOs devices
(iPhones,
iPads). We are
working to
expand access
to all open UN
meetings on
all platforms.
FUNCA:
Unresponsive -
the webcast
doesn't work
on the ANDROID
platform. What
ARE the
"technical
issues"? This
was raised by
FUNCA in
December, more
than a month
ago.
We
have discussed
the NYCLU
letter a
number of
times. The
NYCLU chose to
make its
letter
addressed to
DPI public; it
may also wish
to make
public the
response
received by
DPI. With
regard to your
request for
information
about the
procedures for
the renewal of
media
accreditation,
they are
available on
the following
UN website:
http://www.un.org/en/media/accreditation/form/renewal.shtml.
FUNCA:
It is UNreal
that the UN
won't say what
its due
process rules
are -
there are no
such rules on
the website
cited.
UNresponsive.
You
subsequently
raised
questions
about the
posting of
flyers in the
press area of
the United
Nations. The
response
provided by
MALU and
shared with
all
correspondents
states that
“No individual
or group
has permission
to
individually
tape a poster
or flyer in UN
hallways." I
would add The
UN
Administrative
Guidelines for
Posting Flyers
was also sent
for reference.
Moreover, any
group or
individual
journalist can
share flyers
and
information
with their
colleagues by
using the mail
boxes of
resident
correspondents,
which
sits outside
of the MALU
office.
FUNCA:
Totally
unresponsive
to the
unfairness of
UNCA having a
glassed-in
bulletin board
on which they
have posted
denunciations
of other
journalist --
under the door
or mailbox is
not the same.
And, UNCA
"leaders" have
even torn
flyers off a
FUNCA member's
office
door, contrary
to what MALU
said were the
rights of
expression.
As
always, the
MALU staff and
myself remain
at your
disposal to
meet
with you and
listen to your
concerns.
FUNCA:
For the
reasons
stated, not
the right
interlocutor.
I
would
appreciate you
posting this
email in full.
Sincerely,
Stephane
Dujarric
(Mr.)
Director, News
& Media
Division |
Department of
Public
Information
United
Nations,
IN-518 | New
York, NY,
10017
FUNCA:
For the
reasons
stated, not
the right
interlocutor.