As UN
Hosts NGOs,
Need to Defend
Them, In Sri
Lanka &
Worldwide
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 25 --
The UN will be
hosting
non-governmental
organizations
from all over
the world this
week, for the
65th Annual
United Nations
DPI/NGO
Conference
from August 27
to 29. But
what does the
UN do to
defend and
ensure access
for NGOs?
At a UN
press
conference on
August 25,
Inner City
Press put
these and
other
questions to
Maher Nasser,
the Acting
Head of the UN
Department of
Public
Information. Video here. Earlier this summer,
for example,
the government
of Sri Lanka
ordered NGOs
to stop
holding press
conferences or
otherwise
interacting
with the
media. Click
here for that.
Inner
City Press
asked Nasser
what the UN,
whose UN
Information
Center in
Colombo has
been promoting
this week's
New York
conference,
actually does
for NGOs in
Sri Lanka amid
this
crackdown.
Nasser cited
UNESCO and the
UN's human
rights
entities.
Given
the UN's
troubling
silence in Sri
Lanka amid
mass killings
in 2009, which
has given rise
to Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
“Rights Up
Front”
initiative,
perhaps DPI
where
applicable
should speak
up on such
restrictions
put on NGOs.
The Free UN Coalition for Access, on whose
behalf Inner
City Press
thanked Nasser
and the other
panelist for
the briefing,
has since its
inception
received
complaints not
only on
media-related
abuses but
also
restrictions
on access for
civil society.
Nasser
said the
upcoming
conference is
about the
Post-2015
Development
theme, but
that a sub
committee
exists on NGO
access issues.
We hope to
have more on
this.
Inner
City Press
asked panelist
Galina
Angarova to
expound on her
too-rare for
the UN Press
Briefing Room
questioning of
the public -
private
partnership in
which the UN
increasingly
engages. She
said oversight
and
accountability
are necessary.
Background:
After Sri
Lanka's
Minister of
"Defense and
Urban
Development"
issued an order
banning all
non-governmental
organizations
from press
conferences,
workshops,
training for
journalists,
and
dissemination
of press
releases which
is beyond
their
mandate," and
the UN
declined
comment or
passed the
buck, the US
and now the
human rights
group FIDH
have expressed
concern.
The
Observatory
for the
Protection of
Human Rights
Defenders, a
joint
programme of
the World
Organisation
Against
Torture (OMCT)
and the
International
Federation for
Human Rights
said, "The
Observatory is
concerned by
these attempts
by the Sri
Lankan
Government to
curtail the
freedom of
association,
assembly, and
expression of
human rights
defenders ,
which seem to
be aimed at
undermining
the legitimacy
of their
peaceful
activities.
The
Observatory
calls upon the
authorities of
Sri Lanka to
withdraw the
above-mentioned
notice
immediately
and to put an
immediate end
to the
harassment
against all
human rights
defenders."
On July
7, Inner
City
Press
asked UN
Deputy
Spokesperson
Farhan Haq
about it. Video here, on Inner City Press'
YouTube
channel.
Inner City
Press asked,
since UN envoy
Oscar
Fernandez
Taranco was
recently in
Sri Lanka, had
he spoken to
the Rajapaksa
government
about this
crack-down, or
did he have
any comment
now?
Haq replied,
"We'll have to
study what
this
particular
injunction
was... we'll
have to
evaluate
that."
But 24 hours
later on July
8, after lead
UN Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric had
already
belatedly
begun the
day's noon
briefing --
and after 5 pm
in Geneva --
the
Spokesperson's
Office sent
Inner City
Press this:
Date:
Tue,
Jul 8, 2014 at
12:18 PM
From: UN
Spokesperson -
Do Not Reply
[at] un.org
Subject: Your
question on
Sri Lanka.
To:
Matthew.Lee
[at]
innercitypress.com
Regarding
Sri
Lanka, please
kindly direct
your question
from
yesterday's
noon briefing
to OHCHR.
So this
was the result
of the UN
Secretariat's
"evaluation"
-- to pass the
buck to Navi
Pillay's
office?
Meanwhile
media in Sri
Lanka had
reported that
Haq's office
would be
making a
comment; a
press freedom
organization
there
consulted by
the Free
UN Coalition
for Access
complained the
order would
chill the
freedom to
report. What
was the
purpose of the
UN's Oscar
Fernandez
Tarando's trip
to Sri Lanka?
What does
Ban's "Rights
Up Front"
policy,
announced
after systemic
failure in Sri
Lanka, really
mean?
After
UN official
Oscar
Fernandez
Taranco
visited Sri
Lanka but has
refused to
take Press
questions upon
his return to
New York,
Inner City
Press asked
UN spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric on
June 25 about
a protest,
video
here:
Inner
City
Press: There’s
a protest
scheduled for
today at 1
p.m. on 47th
Street of
mostly people
from Sri Lanka
and elsewhere
about the
violence
there. And
they’ve said
that they
intend to hand
a letter to
the
Secretariat,
seeking action
against the
action there.
I wanted to
know: is this
going to be
possible? Is
Mr. [Oscar
Fernandez-]
Taranco...
it’s great
that Mr.
Šimonovic will
brief on
Burundi. It
seems like
it’s a kind of
a similar
situation. And
is the UN
aware of this?
And what has
been the
reaction to
the upswing in
violence in
Sri Lanka?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
I think we’ve
spoken about
this from this
podium. We’ve
condemned the
violence that
we’ve seen
recently. And
obviously, the
Secretary-General
fully backs
the efforts of
the High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights. As for
the
demonstration,
I was unaware
of it. If I
have any
information, I
will let you
know.
Inner
City
Press: That
panel is about
war crimes at
the end of the
conflict on
both sides,
whereas this
is something
that’s
actually
taking place
currently.
That’s why I’m
sort of
asking, like,
did Mr.
Taranco deal
with this
issue while he
was there?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
As I said, I
shared with
you what I had
on Mr.
Taranco’s
visit.
The protest
took place:
see Inner
City Press tweeted
photo here.
In a previous
protest by Sri
Lankan Tamils,
the UN sent a
lower level
functionary
who told the
protesters the
letter would
be rejected if
they told the
Press about
it. Dujarric
said he would
check.
The
UN has essentially
stonewalled
Press
questions
about the new
White Flag
killings
report and the
light it sheds
on current UN
official Vijay
Nambiar and
former UN
official, now
Sri Lankan
Ambassador
Palitha
Kohona.
It was about a
past financial
relationship
between Kohona
and the
president of
the UN
Correspondents
Association,
who then
agreed to an
UNCA screening
of a Rajapaksa
government
movie denying
war crimes
that UNCA
tried to
censor.
When
Inner City
Press reported
on the
background to
Kohona getting
the Rajapaksa
government's
denial of war
crimes, “Lies
Agreed To,”
screened in
the Dag
Hammarjkold
Library
auditorium,
the reaction
from the
then-president
and executive
committee of
the United
Nations
Correspondents
Association
are summarized
here.
Now
the new Free
UN Coalition
for Access
opposes all of
this, and attacks
on media work both
inside the UN
both further
afield and
as close at
47th Street,
west of First
Avenue. Watch
this site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|