UN
Complains ICP
Quoted Its UN
Censorship
Alliance,
Reforms Not
Shown
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
February 27 –
The way some
in the UN try
to use their
UN
Censorship
Alliance was
made clear
Wednesday
evening.
Mid-level
Department of
Public
Information
staffer Stephane
Dujarric, who
previously
accepted
or even encouraged
dis-accreditation
requests
without
providing any
notice or
opportunity to
be heard,
complained
to Inner City
Press about an
article
it wrote.
Of
course it
would be
improper for
the UN
official in
charge of
accrediting
the media to
complain about
the substance
of an article.
So Dujarric
complained
about HOW it
was reported:
with direct
quotes
and audio to
substantiate
them.
Click
here where
Inner City
Press says
"you're on the
record" and
Pamela Falk of
CBS, UNCA's
President,
says "he's
going to write
this up." Yes.
But the letter
of the UN's
Dujarric, who
was there,
pretends this
was never
said.
It
concerned a
February 22
meeting to
which DPI
invited Inner
City
Press, as a
co-founder of
the Free
UN Coalition
for Access.
The
invitation,
sent only the
night before,
did not say
the meeting
would
be off the
record. And at
the meeting,
Inner City
Press
repeatedly
said, yes this
is on the
record.
Another
invitee,
Pamela Falk of
CBS who is the
president of
the UN
Correspondents
Association
(now also
known as the
UN Censorship
Alliance),
even said,
he's going to
report this,
several times.
She
was right. And
at no point in
the meeting
did she or
anybody else
try to put it
off the
record. And
since she
claimed that
she was
previously
misquoted,
she herself
brought on the
need for audio
to accompany
the story and
confirm her
quotes.
Since
Falk during
the meeting --
at which she
called Inner
City Press “a
mugger” and
tried to say
that writing
to media
organizations
about
their policies
“might be a
crime” --
characterized
the use of her
name as part
of a question
in the UN noon
briefing of
February 21 as
“slander,”
Inner City
Press in its
first report
did not use
her
name.
Inner
City Press
waited from
February 22 to
the afternoon
of February 25
before
publishing the
story.
In the
interim, just
as Falk urged
in a
February 15
annual UNCA
meeting on
which Inner
City Press
also
reported, an
UNCA Executive
Committee
member plopped
down in the
UNCA
branded front
row seat at
the February
25 noon
briefing and
demanded
and got the
first
question.
That
is precisely
what Inner
City Press for
FUNCA, on
February 21
and at
the February
22 meeting
with DPI, said
it would
oppose, each
and
every time.
Still,
Inner City
Press went out
of its way not
to include
Falk's name,
nor
that of her
first vice
president,
Louis
Charbonneau of
Reuters.
Charbonneau
during the
meeting, as he
did repeatedly
in 2012, said
that Inner
City Press'
website is
“the problem.”
It is not for
Reuters to try
to dictate
content to
anyone else.
But Dujarric
at the
February 22
meeting did
not say
anything about
this.
It
appears, while
the head of
DPI is out of
the country in
Vienna, that
Dujarric is
trying to use
Inner City
Press'
February 25
report as a
rationale for
not doing
anything for
example about
the ten
needed reforms
FUNCA
submitted on
February 10.
But Inner City
Press stands
entirely
behind the
story,
ironically just
as Dujarric's
ultimate boss
Ban Ki-moon
stood behind
his answer to
Inner City
Press that his
staff
opponents are
“selfish,”
Inner
City Press has
responded
asking
Dujarric if
his formal
letter is
meant to go
into some
dis-accreditation
file, and to
state once and
for all his
knowledge and
/ or presence
at meeting
with UNCA in
2012
seeking to
dis-accredit
Inner City
Press:
I
have just
received your
letter and
must reply. I
said
repeatedly at
the meeting
that it was on
the record.
FUNCA
did not ask
for the
meeting. As I
said, while
FUNCA's
co-founder
suggested we
should not
attend, I did
so as a
courtesy to
Peter.
However
at the
meeting, to
which DPI
invited me,
you allowed
Pam Falk of
UNCA to scream
and call me a
mugger, and
say “you call
yourself a
journalist” --
and you said
nothing.
Louis
Charbonneau of
UNCA (and
Reuters) said
that the
problem is the
Inner City
Press website.
This is
inappropriate,
given freedom
of the press.
But you said
nothing.
If
you will
notice -- and
only as a
courtesy to
Peter -- the
article you
cite did not
at that time
use the names
of the two
UNCA
representatives
you invited,
nor describe
the venue.
Please state
whether your
formal letter
about
an article I
wrote,
sent to me
after 6 pm as
I write about
the Mali
stakeout and
brown bag
session an
answer
promised at
which has not
yet been
provided, is
intended to be
placed in some
file,
regarding
discipline or
accreditation,
and what my
due process
rights are.
Given
that you
yourself have
told me you do
not object to
being quoted,
and that FUNCA
sessions with
DPI were on
the record and
recorded, and
that at the
February 15
meeting I said
repeatedly
that it was on
the record, I
find your
letter
inappropriate.
I reiterate my
question: the
description in
the Voice of
America
document I
cited
http://www.innercitypress.com/unofficials1unca061112.pdf
which
says UNCA met
with the UN
"very quietly"
in the middle
of 2012 about
dis-accreditation
-- please
state who was
at the
meeting(s)
from the UN
(and UNCA)
sides.
Due process
rules are
absolutely
needed. I
will
appreciate
your soonest
response.
Watch
this site.