UN
Admits No
Mission Has a
Claims Commission,
Like on Haiti
Cholera, No
Remedy
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
November 26 --
When the UN
got sued on
charges of
bringing
cholera to
Haiti which
has killed
over 8000
people, a
major reason
was the UN's
failure to set
up the
Standing
Claims Commission
provided for
under its
Status of
Forces
Agreement (or
Status of
Mission
Agreement).
And so
starting nine
days ago,
Inner City
Press has been
asking UN
spokespeople
whether any UN
Peacekeeping
mission has a
standing
claims commission.
UN acting
deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq
told Inner
City Press it
is "not a yes
or no
question,"
then that
counting days
without an
answer wasn't
helpful.
Inner City
Press waited
more days,
then on
November 26 --
nine days
after asking
the question
-- asked it
again at the
day's noon
briefing.
Minutes later,
this
admission:
Subject:
Your
question on
claims
commissions
From: UN
Spokesperson -
Do Not
Reply [at]
un.org
Date: Tue, Nov
26, 2013 at
1:13 PM
To:
Matthew.Lee
[at]
innercitypress.com
Regarding
your
question at
today's noon
briefing, we
can confirm
that no
peacekeeping
mission has a
claims
commission in
place.
Clearly
something is broken;
people in countries
ostensibly
helped by the
UN have no recourse
when things go
wrong, even
deadly
wrong.
So what will
be done by
Secretary General
Ban Ki-moon
and Herve
Ladsous, the
UN head of peacekeeping
selected like
his three
predecessors
by France?
The impunity is
flagrant. With
the UN now
akin to a
scofflaw, its
acting deputy
spokesperson
Haq last
Thursday
refused to
confirm or
explain
refusing even
service of the
court papers.
When the
lawyers in the
class
action suit
for victims
of the UN
bringing
cholera to
Haiti tried
to serve the
complaint,
they told
Inner City
Press last
Wednesday, the
UN "refused to
physically
receive
process."
Inner
City Press
asked UN
spokesperson
Farhan Haq the
next day to
confirm and
explain -- but
he said there
was nothing
more to say,
that previous
statements
explain it. Video here and embedded below.
So did then UN
lawyer
Patricia
O'Brien ruling
the
adminstrative
claims were
"not
receivable"
mean her
successor
Miguel de
Serpa Soares
wouldn't even
"receive" the
court case
papers?
The
lawyers tell
Inner City
Press they aim
to ask for
permission for
an alternate
mode: service
by
publication.
Those are the
legal notices
published in
newspapers,
often putting
deadbeat
parents on
notice their
wages will be
garnished. How
has the UN
fallen this
low?
The
victims'
lawyers
anticipate the
UN, once it is
served if only
by newspaper
publication,
making a
motion to
dismiss on the
grounds that
it is immune.
But, they say,
no remedy has
been provided,
nor any
alternative
mechanism.
Just
as Sri Lanka
military
figure, now
Deputy
Permanent
Representative
Shavendra
Silva
successfully
did, the US
State
Department
will be asked
to make a
court filing
supporting
immunity.
This time, the
lawyers say,
there will be
a campaign to
ask the State
Department not
to support
impunity, with
letters to
Secretary of
State John
Kerry
including from
members of
Congress.
Would newly
appointed US
Mission reform
ambassador
Leslie Berger
Kiernan play a
role in this?
On
last Tuesday
evening, Inner
City Press filmed as
State
Department
official
Victoria Holt
heard the UN's
Edmond Mulet essentially
blame the
cholera deaths
on Haitian
under-development;
when given the
floor, Holt
said nothing
about this. Video here; longer
form analysis
by this author
here, on
Beacon Reader.
In the
UN Press
Briefing Room,
for seven days
now Inner City
Press has
waited for a
UN answer to a
yes or no
question: has
UN
Peacekeeping
established
any of the
Standing
Claims
Commissions
provided for
its its Status
of Forces
Agreements.
On
November 14,
UN acting
deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq
said that
actually
setting up a
standing
claims
commission
depends on the
request of the
mission's host
government.
But that not
only ignores
the power
relations, it
did not answer
the yes or no
question.
Haq
referred to
the Department
of
Peacekeeping
Operations.
But its chief
Herve Ladsous
has refused to
answer basic
questions,
such as about
the 135 rapes
at Minova by
UN
Peacekeeping's
partners in
the Congolese
Army. Video
here, UK
coverage here.
So would will
this simple
question be
answered?
Not on
November 18.
Asked again,
Haq said the
question had
been put to UN
Peacekeeping,
but it's "not
a yes or no
question." Video here. If the answer's yes,
can't it be
said in four
days? And if
no - what's
the
explanation?
Or does the UN
Peacekeeping
under Ladsous
think they can
just not
answer?
Waiting
two
days, and
after filming
UN
Peacekeeping
deputy Edmond
Mulet Tuesday
night, here,
Inner City
Press, on
November 20
asked Haq
again, saying
it had been
six days. Haq
replied that
counting days
is not
helpful. But
why did UN
Peacekeeping
not answer a
basic question
for eight
days? Would it
have ever
answered, if
not asked
again and
again? Watch
this site.
Footnote:
also last
Thursday,
Inner City
Press asked
the UN's Haq
for an update
on previous
answers that
the UN Mission
in the Congo
MONUSCO was
"verifying"
reprisal
attacks in
Bunagana and
Kiwanja. These
was no update.
So is the UN
checking or
not?
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2013 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|