For
Darfur
Service, Female
Peacekeeper Is
Punished, UN
Has No Comment
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, March
15 -- The UN
talks a lot
about how much
it values
peacekeepers,
and stresses
the importance
of having
women as peacekeepers
in its
missions.
On March 14,
Inner City
Press asked UN
spokesperson
Stephane
Dujarric:
What
is the UN's /
UN
Peacekeeping's
response to an
Indian police
officer
now facing
punishment for
having served
in the UNAMID
mission in
Darfur? See,
http://www.ndtv.com/article/south/tamil-nadu-suspends-woman-ips-officer-who-served-in-un-mission-in-sudan-495423
While Dujarric
later on March
14 replied
that he had no
comment on
another
questions
Inner City
Press asked,
about doubts
if UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon was
validly
invited to
play any role
in Thailand,
the question
about the
woman
peacekeeper
punished for
serving the UN
in Darfur was
not even
acknowledged,
much less
answered.
On March 15,
UN
Peacekeeping
run by Herve
Ladsous who
refuses to
answer Press
questions,
about child
soldiers or
anything else,
tweeted,
perhaps on
automatic
pilot, "Almost
1,000 female
peacekeepers
serve in AU -
UN Mission in
#Darfur
#womenpeacekeeping."
Inner City
Press immediately
replied, "What
has #Ladsous
done for this
one? No
answer. http://www.ndtv.com/article/south/tamil-nadu-suspends-woman-ips-officer-who-served-in-un-mission-in-sudan-495423."
UNPeacekeeping,
as usually,
did not
respond. But
then Dujarric
did: "No
comment on the
Indian troops...
Your other
questions will
be addressed
on Monday."
How can the UN
have no
comment or
response when
a peacekeeper,
in this case a
woman
peacekeeper,
is punished
for having
served in a
Mission? And
as to Monday,
there are a
number of
questions
pending, from
Nigeria to UN
envoys to
Ban's
responsiveness
(or not) to
directives of
the General
Assembly.
Watch this
site.
A week
ago a mid
attacks on
civilians in
Darfur in late
February, and
the blocking
of African
Union - UN
peacekeepers
of UNAMID from
accessing the
sites, the UN
Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations
under Herve
Ladsous in New
York had said
little.
Back in July
2013 Ladsous
met with
Sudan's
president Omar
al Bashir,
indicted for
genocide in
Darfur by the
International
Criminal
Court, but has
refused to say
why, despite
critiques from
some human
rights groups,
the Press and
implicitly
Fatou Bensouda, prosecutor of the ICC. This
is Ladsous:
film &
UK.
On the morning
of March 8 US
State
Department
Spokesperson
Jen Psaki
issued this
statement:
We are
deeply
concerned by
the recent
escalation of
violence by
the Sudanese
Government-supported
Rapid Support
Forces (RSF)
in Darfur. The
United States
strongly
condemns
attacks on
civilians and
calls upon the
Government of
Sudan to
prevent
further
violence and
to cease its
own campaign
of aerial
bombardments.
On
February 27th,
the RSF, with
media reports
of support
from the
Sudanese Air
Force, burned
homes and
attacked
civilians
outside of
Nyala,
resulting in
multiple
casualties and
thousands of
displaced
civilians in
Darfur. On
February 23rd
members of the
RSF attacked
and robbed
internally
displaced
persons from
the Kalma Camp
in South
Darfur,
according to
media reports.
The Government
of Sudan has
refused to
allow UNAMID
peacekeepers
access to the
area to
investigate
these
incidents.
We
urge the
Government of
Sudan to
uphold its
commitments
and allow
UNAMID
peacekeepers
unhindered and
immediate
access to
these areas,
as mandated by
the African
Union and the
United
Nations.
The
people of
Darfur have
suffered
insecurity,
violence and
atrocities for
far too long.
Together with
the
international
community, we
urge the
Government of
Sudan and the
armed
movements
active in
Darfur to
begin an
inclusive and
comprehensive
political
dialogue to
achieve a
peaceful
resolution to
the conflicts
in Sudan and
reestablish
the rule of
law.
But where is
Ladsous' DPKO?
Back
on February
4, Inner
City Press asked
UN Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's lead
spokesperson
Martin Nesirky
about a
full-on
critique of UN
Peacekeeping's
Darfur mission
by its former
spokesperson,
Aicha Elbasri:
Inner
City
Press: On
Darfur, maybe
you have
something on
the Government
ordering the
ICRC
(International
Committee of
the Red Cross)
to suspend
operations.
And I also
wanted to know
if there’s any
response from
the UN to
former UNAMID
[African
Union-United
Nations Hybrid
Operation in
Darfur]
spokesperson
Aicha Elbasri.
She’s gone
public, saying
basically
that, while
serving as
spokesperson
of UNAMID, she
wasn’t given
information;
that the
Mission
under-reports
abuses of
civilians and
other
developments
in Darfur. I
wanted to
know, what’s
the response
of the UN to
that?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
I’d have to
check with the
Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations on
both of those.
So,
respecting
that, Inner
City Press
waited. The
answers
weren't
directly
provided by
e-mail as the
UN does with
other, but
read out at
the noon
briefing,
apparently to
see if anyone
else might
report more
positively on
them (no one
did)
"we
were asked
about
reporting by
the African
Union–UN
Mission on
developments
in Darfur.
UNAMID notes
that it
reports
verified
information on
the situation
in Darfur to
the United
Nations and to
the African
Union on a
daily basis.
This
information is
then made
public in the
Secretary-General’s
quarterly
reports to the
Security
Council and,
as the
situation
warrants, in
press
statements."
To a
casual or
ill-informed
listener, it
sounded like a
legitimate
answer. But as
the UN and its
Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations
under Herve
Ladsous
know, this is
part of Aicha
Elbasri's
critique:
"On
24
April I
resigned from
UNAMID and
wrote my
end-of-mission
report
requesting the
Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations to
look into
UNAMID’s
violations of
the UN Public
Information
policy which
calls for
open,
transparent
and honest
information-sharing
with the
media. I
didn't receive
any response.
On past
August, I
requested the
UN Office of
Internal
Oversight
Services to
open an
investigation
into the
matter. The
information I
shared with
them should
have made
anyone who
cares about
the people of
Darfur and the
UN values and
policies jump,
call me and
take a quick
action. What I
received so
far is a
deafening
silence. And I
can no longer
wait, because
every day that
goes by, more
men, women and
children die
in Darfur in
total impunity
and
invisibility.
So today I
will break the
UN code of
conduct and
share with you
some
confidential
photos and
information
that show the
African Union,
the United
Nations and
UNAMID’
conspiracy of
silence."
Surely
Ladsous' DPKO
(and Carman
Lapointe's
OIOS) know
what Aicha
Elbasri
submitted. But
the public
response was
as set forth
above.
Ban
Ki-moon tried
to send his
former
speechwriter
Michael Meyer
to Sudan as
communications
chief of
UNAMID; it
never
happened. Now
Meyer is in
Nairobi, "dean
of the
graduate
school of
media and
communications
at Aga Khan
University."
On the ICRC,
Inner City
Press checked
and has found
that inquiry
was made - by
the ICRC, not
the UN -- with
Sudan's "HAC."
We'll have
more on all
this. Watch
this site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|