UNITED
NATIONS, June
15 -- With
fighting
continuing in
Southern
Kordofan the
day after
shelling
killed a UN
peacekeeper in
Kadugli, a
statement
co-blaming
South Sudan
made and then
retracted
by the UN
Department
of
Peacekeeping
Operations
continues to
circulate on
the Internet.
This
seems like the
opposite of
"peacekeeping,"
like
this.
DPKO
chief Herve
Ladsous'
spokesperson Kieran
Dwyer put out
a statement
masquerading
as a UN News
article on
June 14,
that "'We
condemn
in the
strongest
terms this
shelling. It
is essential
that the
Governments of
Sudan and
South Sudan
immediately
cease
hostilities
and resume
ceasefire
negotiations,'
Mr. Dwyer
said."
This
statement
including
South Sudan,
though corrected
to
"SPLM-North"
without
explanation by
Reuters,
remains online
not
only on
Reuters'
website,
but also on
the
Daily Star in
Lebanon; RTTnews.com;
the
Premium
Times in
Nigeria, via
NAN; Euronews
and the Star
in Malaysia,
both again
with the
quadruple
byline
"Reporting By
Michelle
Nichols in New
York and
Khalid
Abdelaziz in
Khartoum;
Writing by
Maggie Fick;
Editing by
Michael
Roddy."
At
the June
14 noon
briefing,
Inner City
Press asked
Secretary
General
Ban Ki-moon's
spokesperson
Martin Nesirky:
Inner
City Press:
the attack on
Kadugli, there
have been
shelling in
the
past by the
SPLM-North
[Sudan
People’s
Liberation
Movement/Army]
of
the city of
Kadugli. So,
is it possible
to say either
who did it or
at least what
type of shells
were used? By
the same token
there is
also some
dispute about
an oil
pipeline that
was attacked
in Abyei
that caught
fire. But, the
main one I
wanted to know
is on Kadugli
since it is an
attack that
killed a
peacekeeper.
It seems like
there
is only two
parties could
do it, either
the Government
or SPLM-North,
or may be
another rebel
group, but
what type of
shell was
used?
Spokesperson:
Well, I do
know that
there is
already an
investigation
under way to
look into this
incident in
which, as we
have said, one
peacekeeper
was killed and
two more were
wounded. This
was obviously
a serious
incident which
the
Secretary-General
has condemned
and which he
also
referred to at
the stakeout
in his remarks
just a little
while ago as
well. The most
important
thing is that
the Government
of Sudan and
the SPLM-North
suspend their
hostilities
immediately
and resume
ceasefire
negotiations.
As I have
said, needless
to say, after
an
incident of
this kind,
there is an
investigation
to try to
understand
and establish
precisely what
happened. And
that is
something that
is
under way.
Therefore, we
cannot really
go into it any
further about
who may or may
not have been
responsible
for it, okay.
There
has
been no update
since by the
UN. But the
SPLM-North had
said
openly that
they shelled
Kadugli, and
are moving in
on it. So why
did
Ladsous' DPKO
say South
Sudan, then
half-retract
it, and now
say
nothing?
On
World Press
Freedom Day
this year,
Inner City
Press asked
Dwyer how DPKO
chief Herve
Ladsous refusing
to answer
Press
questions, on
topics ranging
from the UN's
introduction
of cholera
into Haiti
to accepting
advice from a
Sri Lanka
military
figure
depicted the
UN's own
report as
engaged in war
crimes to mass rapes in the Congo, is
consistent
with DPKO's
claim to
support free
press where it
runs missions.
Dwyer
defended
Ladsous'
stonewalling,
then changed
the topic to
return to what
he claimed
DPKO is most
concerned
with: South
Sudan. Video
compilation
here.
Watch
this site.