On
North Korea
Nukes, Ban
Ki-moon Takes
3 Handpicked
Q, Ignores
Africa
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
September
9 --
After
North Korea
conducted its
nuclear test,
UN Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon
scheduled a
stakeout press
encounter for
noon on
September 9;
the UN noon
briefing on
all other
topics was
canceled. Ban,
we noted, is
coyly running
for president
of South
Korea. That
seemed to be
the focus.
Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, even
as Ban read
his statement,
tried to catch
the eye of the
reporters he
wanted to ask
questions:
what does Ban
want the
Security
Council to do,
does he feel
disappointed
at how little
he's
accomplished
on this North
Korea file in
his ten years
as SG?
How
about Ban's
(many) other
failures?
Given that the
first meeting
in the
afternoon is
on Western
Sahara, a
“frozen”
conflict Ban
turned hot
through
distracted
sloppiness,
Inner City
Press asked
quite audibly,
“On Western
Sahara, why do
you want the
UN to build a
road for
Morocco?”
Ban did not
answer. Vine
here. Inner
City Press
scoop here.
But would Ban
answer why he
promoted
his own son in
law to top UN
job in Kenya,
without
recusing
himself?
The UN
Security Coouncil
was in South
Sudan, and US
President
Obama and
others in
China for the
G20 when North
Korea
conducted its
most recent
launch. On US
Labor Day,
with the
Council in
Ethiopia, a UN
Security
Council
meeting was
announced for
September 6 at
11:30 am.
After being
accompanied as
now required
by one of Ban
Ki-moon's
minders, click
here,
Inner City
Press arrived
at the UN
Security
Council
stakeout at 11
am. The only
Ambassador to
make remarks,
off UNTV,
before the
meeting was
France's
Francois
Delattre, who
said
“ballistic
launches by
NorthKorea...
are a grave
challenge to
the
non-proliferation
regime.” Vine
here.
After the
consultations
- and a UN
noon briefing
in which Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric once
again refused
to provide
information
about Ban's
promotion of
his own son in
law to the top
UN job in
Kenya and even
the costs of
Ban's current
two week
junket - US
Ambassador
Samantha Power
and her
Japanese and
South Korea
counterpart
spoke on UNTV.
The two
questions,
pointed to by
Power's
spokesman,
were
pre-selected;
these was no
question from
South Korean
media. One
question was
whether any
Press
Statement that
comes out will
refer to
Japan's
Exclusive
Economic Zone.
After New
Zealand as
President of
the Council
for September
read out the
statement
below, right
after the
Council's
short 3 pm
meeting on the
ICTY, Inner
City Press
asked if
there's been
any proposal
to refer to
Japan's EEZ.
But they said
they were not
taking
questions. Vine here. Next time? Watch
this site.
"The members
of the
Security
Council
strongly
condemned the
ballistic
missile
launches
conducted by
the Democratic
People’s
Republic of
Korea on 5
September
2016.
These launches
are in grave
violation of
the Democratic
People’s
Republic of
Korea’s
international
obligations
under United
Nations
Security
Council
resolutions
1718 (2006),
1874 (2009),
2087 (2013),
2094 (2013)
and 2270
(2016).
The members of
the Security
Council
deplore all
Democratic
People’s
Republic of
Korea
ballistic
missile
activities,
including
these
launches,
noting that
such
activities
contribute to
the Democratic
People’s
Republic of
Korea’s
development of
nuclear
weapons
delivery
systems and
increase
tension.
The members of
the Security
Council
further
regretted that
the Democratic
People’s
Republic of
Korea is
diverting
resources to
the pursuit of
ballistic
missiles while
Democratic
People’s
Republic of
Korea citizens
have great
unmet needs.
The members of
the Security
Council
expressed
serious
concern that
the Democratic
People’s
Republic of
Korea
conducted
these
ballistic
missile
launches after
the 15 April,
23 April, 27
April, 28
April, 31 May,
21 June, 9
July, 18 July,
2 August and
23 August
launches, in
flagrant
disregard of
the repeated
statements of
the Security
Council.
The members of
the Security
Council
reiterated
that the
Democratic
People’s
Republic of
Korea shall
refrain from
further
actions,
including
nuclear tests,
in violation
of the
relevant
Security
Council
resolutions
and comply
fully with its
obligations
under these
resolutions.
The members of
the Security
Council called
upon all
Member States
to redouble
their efforts
to implement
fully the
measures
imposed on the
Democratic
People’s
Republic of
Korea by the
Security
Council,
particularly
the
comprehensive
measures
contained in
resolution
2270 (2016).
The members of
the Security
Council
directed the
Committee
established
pursuant to
resolution
1718 (2006) to
intensify its
work to
strengthen
enforcement of
resolution
2270 (2016)
and assist
Member States
to comply with
their
obligations
under that
resolution and
other relevant
resolutions.
The members of
the Security
Council also
called on
Member States
to report as
soon as
possible on
concrete
measures they
have taken in
order to
implement
effectively
the provisions
of resolution
2270 (2016).
The members of
the Security
Council
reiterated the
importance of
maintaining
peace and
stability on
the Korean
Peninsula and
in North-East
Asia at large,
expressed
their
commitment to
a peaceful,
diplomatic and
political
solution to
the situation
and welcomed
efforts by
Council
members, as
well as other
States, to
facilitate a
peaceful and
comprehensive
solution
through
dialogue.
The members of
the Security
Council stress
the importance
of working to
reduce
tensions in
the Korean
Peninsula and
beyond.
The members of
the Security
Council agreed
that the
Security
Council would
continue to
closely
monitor the
situation and
take further
significant
measures in
line with the
Council’s
previously
expressed
determination.
6 September
2016
Watch this
site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2015 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|