After
UN's North
Korea
Resolution
&
Reaction,
Quiet
Committee
Meeting
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
January 30 --
Eight days
after the UN Security
Council
adopted a
resolution
about North
Korea's
missile launch,
the 1718 or
DPRK Sanctions
Committee met
in the UN's
North Lawn
building.
The
new
chairperson of
the committee,
Luxembourg's
Sylvie Lucas,
emerged past 5
pm from the
meeting room.
She accepted
the Press'
invitation to
provide a
brief summary,
as her
predecessor
Ambassador
Cabral of
Portugal used
to do.
She
said the first
part of the
meeting was
simply
acclimating
the five new
members to the
work of the
Committee. The
head of Panel
of Experts,
who recently
met with
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon, made
a
presentation.
Then, she
said, the
discussion was
about the
resolution and
implementation.
Inner
City Press
asked her if
there had been
any discussion
of North
Korea's
statements
after the
resolution.
No, she said.
Hong Kong
company? No.
Missile
launchers? No.
A gaggle
representing,
almost without
exception,
Japanese media
hung on her
every word,
and thanked
her afterward.
This is an
active or even
omnipresent
part of the
press corps
not treated
well enough by
the UN nor, it
seems, its
partners.
Earlier
on
Wednesday, the
Security
Council's
president for
January Masood
Khan of
Pakistan
answered a
DPRK question
by saying that
the members of
the Council
have been
monitoring the
statements
from
Pyongyang.
But apparently
this
monitoring is
done country
by country, or
at least not
in the
sanctions
committee.
Anyway, it is
a start. Watch
this site.
From
the US Mission
to the UN's
January
22
transcript:
Inner
City Press:
China had said
it would only
agree to a
resolution
that was, in
its view,
proportionate
to this
launch. Do you
think that
this
response-they're
claiming that
it doesn't
really-it's
putting new
names under
existing
sanctions but
it's not
really new
sanctions. Is
it a
proportionate
response?
Ambassador
Rice:
...Clearly
there are new
sanctions in
this
resolution. By
definition,
any time
additional
entities or
individuals or
items are
banned from
action that
they would
otherwise not
be banned
from, that's a
new sanction,
by definition.
So, we don't
need to have a
semantic
debate and
discussion
here.
But this is
also a
resolution
that built
upon 1874 and
1718 and was a
substantial
tightening of
the existing
regime, which
as you know is
already a very
robust
sanctions
regime. And we
think the
tightening of
it and strict
implementation
of it, in and
of itself, are
very valuable
steps. We
worked quite
closely and
cooperatively,
as I said, not
only with
China but
other partners
in the P5, and
the Republic
of Korea and
Japan and
other
interested
members of the
Security
Council to
arrive at this
outcome. We
think it is a
strong and
credible
outcome worthy
of the
collective
effort we all
invested in
it. Thank you
very much.
Summary
from the
January 22
stakeout of
RoK PR Kim
Sook:
Inner
City Press: It
seems the
resolution was
negotiated
between the US
and
China.
What was South
Korea's role
in those
negotiations?
Are you
satisfied by
the process?
Amb. Kim Sook:
I appreciate
the
demonstration
of solidarity
in the
security
council in the
process of
negotiating
the language
of the
resolution,
and I
especially
appreciate the
role that was
played by the
United States
and China, but
at the same
time, this is
the concerted
effort of all
the security
council
members.
So, we did
what we did,
and every
member had
played a
positive role,
I would
say. I'm
not going to
go into detail
about that,
but we did
actually
participate,
and I think I
contributed in
a positive
way.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-253, UN, NY 10017 USA Tel:
212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2013 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|