On
DRC,
France Won't
Answer If UN
Brigade Is a
Combatant,
Ladsous
Reversed
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 29 --
After the UN
Security
Council issued
a
French-drafted
press
statement on
the Democratic
Republic of
the
Congo
which tried to
distinguish
among
"peacekeepers"
between those
entitled to
protection as
civilians
under the
international
law of armed
conflict and
those not,
Inner City
Press
asked French
Ambassador
Alexis Lamek a
question about
it,
repeatedly.
But there was
no answer.
Inner
City Press
asked if the
UN's Force
Intervention
Brigade is a
party to
an armed
conflict -- it
has flown
attack
helicopter
sorties
against
the M23 armed
group. Lamek
did not answer
this yes or no
question. Are
members of the
FIB
"combatants"?
Again Lamek
would not
answer.
When
Rwanda's
Deputy
Permanent
Representative
Olivier
Nduhungirehe
followed Lamek
to the UN TV
microphone,
Inner City
Press asked
him if
he thought the
UN has become
less than
impartial in
this conflict.
His answer
included
noting that
while UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous on
July 11 said
his mandate
does not
include Rwanda
or the
attacks on
Rwanda
attributed to
the FDLR
militia, now
UN
Peacekeeping
reverses or
ignores that
limit and is
quick to say
the M23 rebels
fired
on Rwanda.
He
noted that a
Joint
Verification
official from
Uganda was
banned from
entering the
DRC. He noted
that the UN's
Group of
Experts, while
acknowledging
attacks on
Rwandaphones
in and around
Goma, tried to
blame these on
Rwanda.
Has
the UN lost
its way in
this conflict?
For now we'll
note that
France,
the country
that "holds
the pen,"
drafting all
Security
Council output
on DRC,
refuses to
answer basic
legal
questions. To
this has UN
Peacekeeping,
led four times
in a row now
by a Frenchman
(in this case
one
with history
in the Great
Lakes, in
1994)
descended.
When
a Tanzanian
soldier in the
UN's new Force
Intervention
Brigade in the
Congo died in
battle this
week, the
statements of
UN Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon and
his envoy
Martin
Kobler did not
call it a war
crime. (Click
here for
Inner City
Press
story
and "Rest in
Peace.)
On
August 29 the
UN Security
Council agreed
to a press
statement on
DRC
with this
convoluted
paragraph:
"They
recalled
that
intentionally
directing
attacks
against
personnel,
installations,
material,
units or
vehicles
involved in a
peacekeeping
mission in
accordance
with the
Charter of the
UN, as long as
they are
entitled to
the protection
given to
civilians or
civilian
objects
under the
international
law of armed
conflict,
constitutes a
crime
under
international
law."
So
if a member of
the FIB is
attacking to
"neutralize"
armed
groups, can he
or she be "
entitled to
the protection
given to
civilians or
civilian
objects under
the
international
law of armed
conflict"? The
answer appears
to be no.
For
week Inner
City Press has
asked the UN
to clarify its
understanding
of the
applicability
of the
international
law of armed
conflict to
its FIB,
without
success. In a
UN basement
conference
room an
expert,
on camera,
told Inner
City Press it
is not a war
crime to shot
at a
combatant. Click
here. And
that is what
the FIB has
become. But
how far does
the
slippage go?
Inner
City Press on
the August 29
noon briefing
asked about
Rwanda getting
bombed, and
how did it.
Spokesperson
Haq said
couldn't
confirm most
recently
bombings; then
his office
sent this:
From:
UN
Spokesperson -
Do Not Reply
[at] un.org
Date: Thu, Aug
29, 2013
at 12:52 PM
Subject: re:
question on
DRC
To:
Matthew.Lee
[at]
innercitypress.com
Regarding
your
question on
DRC, here is
our answer:
The
Mission
reports that
it can confirm
firing
incidents into
Rwanda
territory
originated by
M23 positions
between 22 and
29 August. The
Mission
further
reports that
it has not
witnessed any
FARDC firing
into Rwanda
territory
during this
period.
We'll
see.
While
the UN deploys
attack
helicopters in
Eastern Congo,
and bombs from
inside the DRC
have
reportedly
killed a
woman in
Rwanda, France
has called an
emergency UN
Security
Council
session on the
DRC on
Thursday.
The
idea is to
strong-arm
Rwanda on a
draft press
statement
France
proposed.
Actually,
Rwanda is
proposing
adding the
fact that the
"repeated
mortar shells
and bombs
landing in
Rwandan
territory"
come "from the
DRC." How
controversial.
Without that
change, Inner
City Press has
obtained the
draft and puts it
online here.
The
modus operandi
is to hand
information to
Reuters.
At
last Friday's
noon briefing,
video
here from
Minute 10:15,
Inner City
Press asked
the UN's
outgoing
deputy
spokesperson
Eduardo Del
Buey about the
answer, when
Inner City
Press and
another
journalist
asked UN
Peacekeeping
acting chief
Edmond Mulet
Thursday if
the M23 rebels
had entered
the security
zone
established
around Goma.
"No,"
Mulet said.
"Just
mortars." He
went on to
refer to the
separate "red
line"
established
when M23
agreed in
Kampala to
pull out of
Goma. (The
portion of
that agreement
that gave M23
one third of
the security
force at the
Goma airport
remains
unimplemented.)
But
later on
Thursday, the
wire service
Reuters reported
"a senior U.N.
official, who
asked not to
be named, said
that on
Thursday the
rebels entered
a security
zone
surrounding
Goma" -- which
Mulet, the
acting chief
of DPKO, had
just denied.
Inner City
Press and the
other
journalist
waited to ask
Mulet again,
and got the
same answer.
So who
is this
"senior UN
official who
asked not to
be named"? In
UN
Peacekeeping,
only Herve
Ladsous,
long absent
from UN
Headquarters,
is senior to
and could
over-rule
Mulet.
Ladsous
has
in the past
spoon-fed
answers of
dubious
veracity to
this same Reuters
UN bureau
bragging for
example about
the Congolese
Army imposing
accountability
for the 135
rapes in
Minova in
November 2012.
But with only
a few
arrests for
the 135 rapes,
Ladsous' DPKO
continues
supporting the
391st
Battalion,
even as it is
now implicated
in corpse
desecration.
That
the UN would
try to use
Reuters,
willingly,
resonates with
a documented
instance in
June 2012 when
Reuters
UN bureau
chief Louis
Charbonneau
gave to UN
official
Stephane
Dujarric an
internal UNCA
anti-Press
document,
three
minutes after
saying he
would not do
so. Story
here, audio here,
document
here, in
which
Charbonneau
tells
Dujarric, "You
didn't get
this from me."
So is
Reuters'
"senior UN
official who
asked not to
be named"
someone junior
to Mulet, or
as another
journalist
suggested, no
one at all?
On Friday, Del
Buey said he
knew what
Mulet had
said, and has
"seen other
reports." He
said he'd have
to check. But
last Friday
was his last
day at the UN
(the Free
UN Coalition
for Access
wished him
well, video
here at
Minute
9:55).
So we'll see.
Watch this
site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2013 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|